File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite - A randomized clinical trial

TitleEffect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite - A randomized clinical trial
Authors
Issue Date2009
PublisherOperative Dentistry. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jopdent.org
Citation
Operative Dentistry, 2009, v. 34 n. 6, p. 648-655 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study investigated the ability of a glass-ionomer cement (GIC) lining to reduce postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite. In addition, the effects of a total-etch and self-etch adhesive on postoperative sensitivity were also compared. Patients who had moderate to deep occlusal caries of at least one molar were recruited. Overall, 103 restorations were placed in 70 participants, with an average age of 22.8 ± 3.8 years. Preoperatively, each tooth was evaluated for cold-stimulated tooth sensitivity using a visual analog scale. If present, tooth sensitivity induced by cold/hot drinks or occlusal function was also noted. Caries was stained with a caries detector dye, then removed using slow-speed burs and hand excavators. The cavity was restored with one of four randomly allocated restorative procedures: 1) bonded with a two-step, total-etch adhesive (Single Bond 2); 2) lined with a resin-modified GIC liner (Fuji Lining LC), then bonded with total-etch adhesive; 3) bonded with a two-step, self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) and 4) lined with the GIC liner, then bonded with self-etch adhesive. The cavities were incrementally filled with a nanofilled hybrid resin composite. At recall, postoperative sensitivity was evaluated at one week and one month. Overall, postoperative sensitivity in daily function was rare. No significant difference in postoperative sensitivity, either in daily function or in response to a cold stimulus, was observed between the restorative procedures with or without the GIC liner, regardless of the adhesive used (pgt;0.05). In addition, no difference in postoperative sensitivity was noted between use of the self-etch and total-etch adhesive.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154594
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.819
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.641
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_US
dc.contributor.authorBanomyong, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorHarnirattisai, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorMesser, HHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:23Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:23Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.citationOperative Dentistry, 2009, v. 34 n. 6, p. 648-655en_US
dc.identifier.issn0361-7734en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154594-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the ability of a glass-ionomer cement (GIC) lining to reduce postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite. In addition, the effects of a total-etch and self-etch adhesive on postoperative sensitivity were also compared. Patients who had moderate to deep occlusal caries of at least one molar were recruited. Overall, 103 restorations were placed in 70 participants, with an average age of 22.8 ± 3.8 years. Preoperatively, each tooth was evaluated for cold-stimulated tooth sensitivity using a visual analog scale. If present, tooth sensitivity induced by cold/hot drinks or occlusal function was also noted. Caries was stained with a caries detector dye, then removed using slow-speed burs and hand excavators. The cavity was restored with one of four randomly allocated restorative procedures: 1) bonded with a two-step, total-etch adhesive (Single Bond 2); 2) lined with a resin-modified GIC liner (Fuji Lining LC), then bonded with total-etch adhesive; 3) bonded with a two-step, self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) and 4) lined with the GIC liner, then bonded with self-etch adhesive. The cavities were incrementally filled with a nanofilled hybrid resin composite. At recall, postoperative sensitivity was evaluated at one week and one month. Overall, postoperative sensitivity in daily function was rare. No significant difference in postoperative sensitivity, either in daily function or in response to a cold stimulus, was observed between the restorative procedures with or without the GIC liner, regardless of the adhesive used (pgt;0.05). In addition, no difference in postoperative sensitivity was noted between use of the self-etch and total-etch adhesive.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherOperative Dentistry. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jopdent.orgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOperative Dentistryen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshComposite Resinsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Caries - Therapyen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Cavity Liningen_US
dc.subject.meshDentin Sensitivity - Etiology - Prevention & Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshGlass Ionomer Cementsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleEffect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite - A randomized clinical trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2341/08-098-Cen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19953773-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-70849127633en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-70849127633&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.spage648en_US
dc.identifier.epage655en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000272268200004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBanomyong, D=23003741500en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHarnirattisai, C=6603038130en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMesser, HH=7102353781en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats