File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The biologic width around titanium implants: histometric analysis of the implantogingival junction around immediately and early loaded implants.

TitleThe biologic width around titanium implants: histometric analysis of the implantogingival junction around immediately and early loaded implants.
Authors
Issue Date2009
Citation
The International Journal Of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 2009, v. 29 n. 3, p. 297-305 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study compared the dimensions of the peri-implant soft tissues around immediately and early loaded one-piece implants as well as conventionally loaded one-piece implants. Comparisons of the peri-implant soft tissue dimensions were made among four different loading periods. Forty-eight titanium sandblasted/acid-etched implants were placed in four foxhounds. The implants were placed at four time periods in groups of three. The first group (A) had implants placed 3 months before the placement of restorations. Further groups of three implants each were placed at 21 days (group B), 10 days (group C), and 2 days (group D) before restoration. Three months after abutment connection, all dogs were sacrificed. Histometric analysis of the undecalcified histologic sections included dimensional measurements of the sulcus depth plus junctional epithelium, the connective tissue contact area, and recession measured from the interface to the gingival margin. No statistically significant differences were observed among the four groups. The data suggest that the dimensions of the peri-implant soft tissues around immediately and early loaded one-piece implants are similar to those around conventionally loaded one-piece implants and comparable to the dimensions of the biologic width around natural teeth.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154586
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.039
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.631
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBakaeen, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorQuinlan, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchoolfield, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.contributor.authorCochran, DLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:20Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:20Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe International Journal Of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 2009, v. 29 n. 3, p. 297-305en_US
dc.identifier.issn0198-7569en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154586-
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the dimensions of the peri-implant soft tissues around immediately and early loaded one-piece implants as well as conventionally loaded one-piece implants. Comparisons of the peri-implant soft tissue dimensions were made among four different loading periods. Forty-eight titanium sandblasted/acid-etched implants were placed in four foxhounds. The implants were placed at four time periods in groups of three. The first group (A) had implants placed 3 months before the placement of restorations. Further groups of three implants each were placed at 21 days (group B), 10 days (group C), and 2 days (group D) before restoration. Three months after abutment connection, all dogs were sacrificed. Histometric analysis of the undecalcified histologic sections included dimensional measurements of the sulcus depth plus junctional epithelium, the connective tissue contact area, and recession measured from the interface to the gingival margin. No statistically significant differences were observed among the four groups. The data suggest that the dimensions of the peri-implant soft tissues around immediately and early loaded one-piece implants are similar to those around conventionally loaded one-piece implants and comparable to the dimensions of the biologic width around natural teeth.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistryen_US
dc.subject.meshAcid Etching, Dentalen_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Process - Pathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshConnective Tissue - Pathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Abutmentsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Etchingen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Materials - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis Designen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis, Implant-Supporteden_US
dc.subject.meshDogsen_US
dc.subject.meshEpithelial Attachment - Pathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshGingiva - Pathology - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshGingival Recession - Pathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshRandom Allocationen_US
dc.subject.meshSurgical Flapsen_US
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_US
dc.subject.meshTitanium - Chemistryen_US
dc.titleThe biologic width around titanium implants: histometric analysis of the implantogingival junction around immediately and early loaded implants.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid19537469-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-70249135692en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros165548-
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.spage297en_US
dc.identifier.epage305en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000268713500007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBakaeen, L=6506969871en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridQuinlan, P=7007185613en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSchoolfield, J=6603604871en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCochran, DL=7102108717en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats