File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Transalveolar maxillary sinus floor elevation using osteotomes with or without grafting material. Part II: Radiographic tissue remodeling

TitleTransalveolar maxillary sinus floor elevation using osteotomes with or without grafting material. Part II: Radiographic tissue remodeling
Authors
Issue Date2009
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2009, v. 20 n. 7, p. 677-683 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To evaluate the pattern of tissue remodeling after maxillary sinus floor elevation using the transalveolar osteotome technique with or without utilizing grafting materials. Methods: During the period of 2000-2005, 252 Straumann® dental implants were inserted using the transalveolar sinus floor elevation technique in a group of 181 patients. For 88 or 35% of those implants, deproteinized bovine bone mineral with a particle size of 0.25-1 mm was used as the grafting material, but for the remaining 164 implants, no grafting material was utilized. Periapical radiographs were obtained with a paralleling technique and digitized. Two investigators, who were blinded to whether grafting material was used or not, subsequently evaluated the pattern of tissue remodeling. Results: The mean residual bone height was 7.5 mm (SD 2.2 mm), ranging from 2 to 12.7 mm. The mean residual bone height for implants placed with grafting material (6.4 mm) was significantly less compared with the implants installed without grafting material (8.1 mm). The implants penetrated on average 3.1 mm (SD 1.7 mm) into the sinus cavity. The measured mean radiographic bone gain using the transalveolar technique without grafting material was significantly less, 1.7 mm (SD 2 mm) compared with a mean bone gain of 4.1 mm (SD 2.4 mm), when grafting material was used. Furthermore, the probability of gaining 2 mm or more of new bone was 39.1% when no grafting material was used. The probability increased to 77.9% when the implants were installed with grafting material. Conclusion: When the transalveolar sinus floor elevation was performed without utilizing grafting material, only a moderate gain of new bone could be detected mesial and distal to the implants. On the other hand, when grafting material was used, a substantial gain of new bone was usually seen on the radiographs. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154571
ISSN
2014 Impact Factor: 3.889
2014 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.290
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the promotion of Oral Health, University of Bern, Switzerland
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by the Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the promotion of Oral Health, University of Bern, Switzerland.

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPjetursson, BEen_US
dc.contributor.authorIgnjatovic, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorMatuliene, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrägger, Uen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchmidlin, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:14Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:14Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2009, v. 20 n. 7, p. 677-683en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154571-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the pattern of tissue remodeling after maxillary sinus floor elevation using the transalveolar osteotome technique with or without utilizing grafting materials. Methods: During the period of 2000-2005, 252 Straumann® dental implants were inserted using the transalveolar sinus floor elevation technique in a group of 181 patients. For 88 or 35% of those implants, deproteinized bovine bone mineral with a particle size of 0.25-1 mm was used as the grafting material, but for the remaining 164 implants, no grafting material was utilized. Periapical radiographs were obtained with a paralleling technique and digitized. Two investigators, who were blinded to whether grafting material was used or not, subsequently evaluated the pattern of tissue remodeling. Results: The mean residual bone height was 7.5 mm (SD 2.2 mm), ranging from 2 to 12.7 mm. The mean residual bone height for implants placed with grafting material (6.4 mm) was significantly less compared with the implants installed without grafting material (8.1 mm). The implants penetrated on average 3.1 mm (SD 1.7 mm) into the sinus cavity. The measured mean radiographic bone gain using the transalveolar technique without grafting material was significantly less, 1.7 mm (SD 2 mm) compared with a mean bone gain of 4.1 mm (SD 2.4 mm), when grafting material was used. Furthermore, the probability of gaining 2 mm or more of new bone was 39.1% when no grafting material was used. The probability increased to 77.9% when the implants were installed with grafting material. Conclusion: When the transalveolar sinus floor elevation was performed without utilizing grafting material, only a moderate gain of new bone could be detected mesial and distal to the implants. On the other hand, when grafting material was used, a substantial gain of new bone was usually seen on the radiographs. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss - Radiographyen_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Ridge Augmentation - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshBiocompatible Materialsen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Matrix - Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Regeneration - Physiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Remodeling - Physiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Substitutes - Therapeutic Useen_US
dc.subject.meshCollagenen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis, Implant-Supporteden_US
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration Failureen_US
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshImage Processing, Computer-Assisteden_US
dc.subject.meshMaxilla - Radiography - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshMaxillary Sinus - Radiography - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshMembranes, Artificialen_US
dc.subject.meshMinerals - Therapeutic Useen_US
dc.subject.meshOsteotomy - Instrumentation - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshRadiography, Bitewingen_US
dc.subject.meshRadiography, Dental, Digitalen_US
dc.subject.meshSingle-Blind Methoden_US
dc.subject.meshWound Healing - Physiologyen_US
dc.titleTransalveolar maxillary sinus floor elevation using osteotomes with or without grafting material. Part II: Radiographic tissue remodelingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01721.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19515059en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-66749165997en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros165461-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-66749165997&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.spage677en_US
dc.identifier.epage683en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000266696300004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPjetursson, BE=6506841442en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridIgnjatovic, D=35069451200en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMatuliene, G=7801433083en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBrägger, U=7005538598en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSchmidlin, K=24476651100en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.citeulike4834154-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats