File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception

TitleMaxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception
Authors
Issue Date2009
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2009, v. 20 n. 7, p. 667-676 How to Cite?
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri-implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome-installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient-centered outcomes. Material and methods: During 2000 to 2005, 252 Straumann® dental implants were inserted in 181 patients. The surgical technique was a modification of the original osteotome technique presented by Summers. In addition to the clinical examination, the patients were asked to give their perception of the surgical procedure, utilizing a visual analogue scale. Results: The cumulative survival rate of the osteotome-installed implants after a mean follow-up time of 3.2 years, was 97.4% (95% confidence intervals: 94.4-98.8%). From the 252 implants inserted, three were lost before loading and another three were lost in the first and second year. According to residual bone height the survival was 91.3% for implant sites with ≤4 mm residual bone height, and 90% for sites with 4 mm and 5 mm, when compared with that of 100% in sites with bone height of above 5 mm. According to implant length the survival rates were 100% for 12 mm, 98.7% for 10 mm, 98.7% for 8 mm and only 47.6% for 6 mm implants. Soft tissue parameters (pocket probing depth, probing attachment level, bleeding on probing and marginal bone levels) did not yield any differences between the osteotome-installed and the conventionally placed implants. More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the implant therapy and would undergo similar therapy again if necessary. The cost associated with implant therapy was considered to be justified. Conclusion: In conclusion, the osteotome technique was a reliable method for implant insertion in the posterior maxilla, especially at sites with 5 mm or more of preoperative residual bone height and a relatively flat sinus floor. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154570
ISSN
2013 Impact Factor: 3.123
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

Author Affiliations
  1. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine
  2. University of Iceland
  3. Prince Philip Dental Hospital
  4. Universität Bern
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPjetursson, BEen_US
dc.contributor.authorRast, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrägger, Uen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchmidlin, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorZwahlen, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:13Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:13Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2009, v. 20 n. 7, p. 667-676en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154570-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri-implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome-installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient-centered outcomes. Material and methods: During 2000 to 2005, 252 Straumann® dental implants were inserted in 181 patients. The surgical technique was a modification of the original osteotome technique presented by Summers. In addition to the clinical examination, the patients were asked to give their perception of the surgical procedure, utilizing a visual analogue scale. Results: The cumulative survival rate of the osteotome-installed implants after a mean follow-up time of 3.2 years, was 97.4% (95% confidence intervals: 94.4-98.8%). From the 252 implants inserted, three were lost before loading and another three were lost in the first and second year. According to residual bone height the survival was 91.3% for implant sites with ≤4 mm residual bone height, and 90% for sites with 4 mm and 5 mm, when compared with that of 100% in sites with bone height of above 5 mm. According to implant length the survival rates were 100% for 12 mm, 98.7% for 10 mm, 98.7% for 8 mm and only 47.6% for 6 mm implants. Soft tissue parameters (pocket probing depth, probing attachment level, bleeding on probing and marginal bone levels) did not yield any differences between the osteotome-installed and the conventionally placed implants. More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the implant therapy and would undergo similar therapy again if necessary. The cost associated with implant therapy was considered to be justified. Conclusion: In conclusion, the osteotome technique was a reliable method for implant insertion in the posterior maxilla, especially at sites with 5 mm or more of preoperative residual bone height and a relatively flat sinus floor. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 And Overen_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss - Classificationen_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Ridge Augmentation - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Matrix - Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Substitutes - Therapeutic Useen_US
dc.subject.meshCohort Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Abutmentsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis, Implant-Supporteden_US
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration Failureen_US
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshGingival Hemorrhage - Classificationen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaxilla - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshMaxillary Sinus - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshMinerals - Therapeutic Useen_US
dc.subject.meshOsteotomy - Instrumentation - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshPatient Satisfactionen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Attachment Loss - Classificationen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Pocket - Classificationen_US
dc.subject.meshProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subject.meshYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleMaxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perceptionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19486079en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-66749099062en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros165458-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-66749099062&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.spage667en_US
dc.identifier.epage676en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000266696300003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPjetursson, BE=6506841442en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridRast, C=35070274300en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBrägger, U=7005538598en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSchmidlin, K=24476651100en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZwahlen, M=7004748418en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.citeulike4834155-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats