File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-66749099062
- PMID: 19486079
- WOS: WOS:000266696300003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception
Title | Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Biological complications Bone augmentation Bone grafting Complications Crestal approach Dental implants Failures Longitudinal Osteotome technique Patients' perception Patients' satisfaction Peri-implantitis Sinus augmentation Sinus floor elevation |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR |
Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2009, v. 20 n. 7, p. 667-676 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives: To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri-implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome-installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient-centered outcomes. Material and methods: During 2000 to 2005, 252 Straumann® dental implants were inserted in 181 patients. The surgical technique was a modification of the original osteotome technique presented by Summers. In addition to the clinical examination, the patients were asked to give their perception of the surgical procedure, utilizing a visual analogue scale. Results: The cumulative survival rate of the osteotome-installed implants after a mean follow-up time of 3.2 years, was 97.4% (95% confidence intervals: 94.4-98.8%). From the 252 implants inserted, three were lost before loading and another three were lost in the first and second year. According to residual bone height the survival was 91.3% for implant sites with ≤4 mm residual bone height, and 90% for sites with 4 mm and 5 mm, when compared with that of 100% in sites with bone height of above 5 mm. According to implant length the survival rates were 100% for 12 mm, 98.7% for 10 mm, 98.7% for 8 mm and only 47.6% for 6 mm implants. Soft tissue parameters (pocket probing depth, probing attachment level, bleeding on probing and marginal bone levels) did not yield any differences between the osteotome-installed and the conventionally placed implants. More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the implant therapy and would undergo similar therapy again if necessary. The cost associated with implant therapy was considered to be justified. Conclusion: In conclusion, the osteotome technique was a reliable method for implant insertion in the posterior maxilla, especially at sites with 5 mm or more of preoperative residual bone height and a relatively flat sinus floor. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154570 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pjetursson, BE | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rast, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Brägger, U | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Schmidlin, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zwahlen, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:26:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:26:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2009, v. 20 n. 7, p. 667-676 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154570 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri-implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome-installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient-centered outcomes. Material and methods: During 2000 to 2005, 252 Straumann® dental implants were inserted in 181 patients. The surgical technique was a modification of the original osteotome technique presented by Summers. In addition to the clinical examination, the patients were asked to give their perception of the surgical procedure, utilizing a visual analogue scale. Results: The cumulative survival rate of the osteotome-installed implants after a mean follow-up time of 3.2 years, was 97.4% (95% confidence intervals: 94.4-98.8%). From the 252 implants inserted, three were lost before loading and another three were lost in the first and second year. According to residual bone height the survival was 91.3% for implant sites with ≤4 mm residual bone height, and 90% for sites with 4 mm and 5 mm, when compared with that of 100% in sites with bone height of above 5 mm. According to implant length the survival rates were 100% for 12 mm, 98.7% for 10 mm, 98.7% for 8 mm and only 47.6% for 6 mm implants. Soft tissue parameters (pocket probing depth, probing attachment level, bleeding on probing and marginal bone levels) did not yield any differences between the osteotome-installed and the conventionally placed implants. More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the implant therapy and would undergo similar therapy again if necessary. The cost associated with implant therapy was considered to be justified. Conclusion: In conclusion, the osteotome technique was a reliable method for implant insertion in the posterior maxilla, especially at sites with 5 mm or more of preoperative residual bone height and a relatively flat sinus floor. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_US |
dc.subject | Biological complications | - |
dc.subject | Bone augmentation | - |
dc.subject | Bone grafting | - |
dc.subject | Complications | - |
dc.subject | Crestal approach | - |
dc.subject | Dental implants | - |
dc.subject | Failures | - |
dc.subject | Longitudinal | - |
dc.subject | Osteotome technique | - |
dc.subject | Patients' perception | - |
dc.subject | Patients' satisfaction | - |
dc.subject | Peri-implantitis | - |
dc.subject | Sinus augmentation | - |
dc.subject | Sinus floor elevation | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adolescent | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 And Over | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Alveolar Bone Loss - Classification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Matrix - Transplantation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Substitutes - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cohort Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Abutments | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Restoration Failure | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Follow-Up Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Gingival Hemorrhage - Classification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Maxilla - Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Maxillary Sinus - Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Minerals - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Osteotomy - Instrumentation - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Satisfaction | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Periodontal Attachment Loss - Classification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Periodontal Pocket - Classification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Survival Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Young Adult | en_US |
dc.title | Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19486079 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-66749099062 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 165458 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-66749099062&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 20 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 667 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 676 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000266696300003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Pjetursson, BE=6506841442 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Rast, C=35070274300 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Brägger, U=7005538598 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Schmidlin, K=24476651100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zwahlen, M=7004748418 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 4834155 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0905-7161 | - |