File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/ejo/cjm124
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-54249159289
- PMID: 18458028
- WOS: WOS:000260151600006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Stability of connected mini-implants and miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics
Title | Stability of connected mini-implants and miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||||
Issue Date | 2008 | ||||||
Publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ | ||||||
Citation | European Journal Of Orthodontics, 2008, v. 30 n. 5, p. 483-489 How to Cite? | ||||||
Abstract | The aim of this study was to examine the primary stability of connected mini-implants and miniplates. Three different skeletal anchorage systems were investigated: (1) two 1.5 mm diameter cylindrical mini-implants connected with a 0.021 × 0.025 inch stainless steel (SS) wire, (2) two 1.6 mm diameter tapered mini-implants connected with a 0.021 × 0.025 inch SS wire, and (3) two 2.0 mm diameter cylindrical mini-implants connected by a titanium locking miniplate. Fifteen standardized bovine bone specimens were prepared, five specimens for each experimental group. The connected mini-implants were fixed on the bone specimens. The systems underwent uniaxial pull-out tests at the midpoint of the connecting wire or miniplate using a mechanical testing machine. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine the difference of the pull-out test results between the groups.Both the titanium miniplate and SS wire connection systems showed severe deformation at the screw head, which broke before the mini-implants failed. The 2.0 mm miniplate system showed the highest pull-out force (529 N) compared with the other two wire connection systems (P < 0.001). The 2.0 mm system was also stiffer than the 1.6 and 1.5 mm systems (P < 0.001). The yield force of the 2.0 mm miniplate (153 N) was significantly higher than the 1.5 mm (88 N) and 1.6 mm (76 N) systems (P < 0.001).This in vitro study demonstrated that the connection of two mini-implants with a miniplate resulted in higher pull-out force, stiffness, and yield force to resist pulling force and deformation. Such a set-up could thus provide a stable system for orthodontic skeletal anchorage. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. | ||||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154546 | ||||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.940 | ||||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: The University Strategic Research Theme: Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics, University of Hong Kong (10206152.11222.21700.302.01); a Competative Earmarked Research Grant (CERG) grant (102006968.22311.08003.324.01). | ||||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Leung, MTC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Rabie, ABM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, RWK | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:26:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:26:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | European Journal Of Orthodontics, 2008, v. 30 n. 5, p. 483-489 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0141-5387 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154546 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to examine the primary stability of connected mini-implants and miniplates. Three different skeletal anchorage systems were investigated: (1) two 1.5 mm diameter cylindrical mini-implants connected with a 0.021 × 0.025 inch stainless steel (SS) wire, (2) two 1.6 mm diameter tapered mini-implants connected with a 0.021 × 0.025 inch SS wire, and (3) two 2.0 mm diameter cylindrical mini-implants connected by a titanium locking miniplate. Fifteen standardized bovine bone specimens were prepared, five specimens for each experimental group. The connected mini-implants were fixed on the bone specimens. The systems underwent uniaxial pull-out tests at the midpoint of the connecting wire or miniplate using a mechanical testing machine. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine the difference of the pull-out test results between the groups.Both the titanium miniplate and SS wire connection systems showed severe deformation at the screw head, which broke before the mini-implants failed. The 2.0 mm miniplate system showed the highest pull-out force (529 N) compared with the other two wire connection systems (P < 0.001). The 2.0 mm system was also stiffer than the 1.6 and 1.5 mm systems (P < 0.001). The yield force of the 2.0 mm miniplate (153 N) was significantly higher than the 1.5 mm (88 N) and 1.6 mm (76 N) systems (P < 0.001).This in vitro study demonstrated that the connection of two mini-implants with a miniplate resulted in higher pull-out force, stiffness, and yield force to resist pulling force and deformation. Such a set-up could thus provide a stable system for orthodontic skeletal anchorage. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Orthodontics | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Animals | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Biomechanics | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Plates | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cattle | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Stress Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Equipment Failure | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Miniaturization | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures - Instrumentation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Orthodontic Appliance Design | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Orthodontic Wires | en_US |
dc.title | Stability of connected mini-implants and miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Rabie, ABM: rabie@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Wong, RWK: fyoung@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Rabie, ABM=rp00029 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Wong, RWK=rp00038 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/ejo/cjm124 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18458028 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-54249159289 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 153151 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-54249159289&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 30 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 483 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 489 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000260151600006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Leung, MTC=24344215400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Rabie, ABM=7007172734 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, RWK=7402127170 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0141-5387 | - |