File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bonding of one-step and two-step self-etching primer adhesives to dentin with different tubule orientations

TitleBonding of one-step and two-step self-etching primer adhesives to dentin with different tubule orientations
Authors
KeywordsAll-in-one adhesives
Dentin depth
Dentin tubules
Dentin wetness
Microshear bond strength
Issue Date2008
PublisherInforma Healthcare. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00016357.asp
Citation
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2008, v. 66 n. 3, p. 159-168 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives. To determine the microshear bond strengths of five 'all-in-one' adhesives and two 2-step self-etching primer adhesives to dentin with different tubule orientations and to compare bond strengths between the adhesives. Material and methods. Human adult molar teeth were sectioned to obtain dentin pieces with tubule orientations perpendicular or parallel/oblique to the bonded surface. Two 2-step self-etching primer adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Optibond Solo Plus SE Bond (Op. SE)) and five all-in-one adhesives (Clearfil S3 Bond (S3), Optibond All-in-One Bond (Op. AIO), G-Bond, Go!, and Xeno IV) were applied to dentin in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions. Resin composite cylinders were bonded to superficial and deep dentin using microtubes (0.75 mm internal diameter and 1.5 mm high). Bonded specimens were stored in water at 37°C for 24 h, then stressed in shear at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min until bond failure. Maximum load at failure (N) was recorded and converted to MPa. Statistical analyses were carried out using independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD test. Results. Though bond strengths varied slightly, four all-in-one adhesives (Op. AIO, G-Bond, Go!, and Xeno IV) showed no significant differences in microshear bond strengths regardless of dentin depth (superficial or deep) or dentin tubule orientation (perpendicular or parallel/oblique). CSE, Op. SE, and S3 showed significantly lower bond strengths to deep dentin with a tubule orientation perpendicular to the surface. Conclusion. Most of the all-in-one adhesive systems used in this study appear to bond equally well to dentin independently of tubule orientation and depth. One two-step self-etching primer adhesive bonded significantly better than the all-in-one adhesives. © 2008 Taylor & Francis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154524
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.232
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.712
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAsande Adebayo, Oen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrancis Burrow, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Tyas, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:25:57Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:25:57Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 2008, v. 66 n. 3, p. 159-168en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154524-
dc.description.abstractObjectives. To determine the microshear bond strengths of five 'all-in-one' adhesives and two 2-step self-etching primer adhesives to dentin with different tubule orientations and to compare bond strengths between the adhesives. Material and methods. Human adult molar teeth were sectioned to obtain dentin pieces with tubule orientations perpendicular or parallel/oblique to the bonded surface. Two 2-step self-etching primer adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Optibond Solo Plus SE Bond (Op. SE)) and five all-in-one adhesives (Clearfil S3 Bond (S3), Optibond All-in-One Bond (Op. AIO), G-Bond, Go!, and Xeno IV) were applied to dentin in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions. Resin composite cylinders were bonded to superficial and deep dentin using microtubes (0.75 mm internal diameter and 1.5 mm high). Bonded specimens were stored in water at 37°C for 24 h, then stressed in shear at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min until bond failure. Maximum load at failure (N) was recorded and converted to MPa. Statistical analyses were carried out using independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD test. Results. Though bond strengths varied slightly, four all-in-one adhesives (Op. AIO, G-Bond, Go!, and Xeno IV) showed no significant differences in microshear bond strengths regardless of dentin depth (superficial or deep) or dentin tubule orientation (perpendicular or parallel/oblique). CSE, Op. SE, and S3 showed significantly lower bond strengths to deep dentin with a tubule orientation perpendicular to the surface. Conclusion. Most of the all-in-one adhesive systems used in this study appear to bond equally well to dentin independently of tubule orientation and depth. One two-step self-etching primer adhesive bonded significantly better than the all-in-one adhesives. © 2008 Taylor & Francis.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInforma Healthcare. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00016357.aspen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Odontologica Scandinavicaen_US
dc.subjectAll-in-one adhesives-
dc.subjectDentin depth-
dc.subjectDentin tubules-
dc.subjectDentin wetness-
dc.subjectMicroshear bond strength-
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshDental Bonding - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Etching - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration Failureen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Stress Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshDentin - Anatomy & Histology - Drug Effectsen_US
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agents - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMolaren_US
dc.subject.meshResin Cements - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshShear Strengthen_US
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysisen_US
dc.titleBonding of one-step and two-step self-etching primer adhesives to dentin with different tubule orientationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailFrancis Burrow, M:mfburr58@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityFrancis Burrow, M=rp01306en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00016350802123118en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18568475-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-45849117632en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-45849117632&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume66en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.spage159en_US
dc.identifier.epage168en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000256978000006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridAsande Adebayo, O=24400605500en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFrancis Burrow, M=7005876730en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridJohn Tyas, M=24401138400en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0001-6357-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats