File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: A report of twelve consecutive cases

TitleRidge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: A report of twelve consecutive cases
Authors
Issue Date2008
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2008, v. 19 n. 1, p. 19-25 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: Lateral ridge augmentations are traditionally performed using autogenous bone grafts to support membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR). The bone-harvesting procedure, however, is accompanied by considerable patient morbidity. Aim: The aim of the present study was to test whether or not resorbable membranes and bone substitutes will lead to successful horizontal ridge augmentation allowing implant installation under standard conditions. Material and methods: Twelve patients in need of implant therapy participated in this study. They revealed bone deficits in the areas intended for implant placement. Soft tissue flaps were carefully raised and blocks or particles of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) (Bio-Oss®) were placed in the defect area. A collagenous membrane (Bio-Gide®) was applied to cover the DBBM and was fixed to the surrounding bone using poly-lactic acid pins. The flaps were sutured to allow for healing by primary intention. Results: All sites in the 12 patients healed uneventfully. No flap dehiscences and no exposures of membranes were observed. Nine to 10 months following augmentation surgery, flaps were raised in order to visualize the outcomes of the augmentation. An integration of the DBBM particles into the newly formed bone was consistently observed. Merely on the surface of the new bone, some pieces of the grafting material were only partly integrated into bone. However, these were not encapsulated by connective tissue but rather anchored into the newly regenerated bone. In all of the cases, but one, the bone volume following regeneration was adequate to place implants in a prosthetically ideal position and according to the standard protocol with complete bone coverage of the surface intended for osseointegration. Before the regenerative procedure, the average crestal bone width was 3.2 mm and to 6.9 mm at the time of implant placement. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.05, Wilcoxon's matched pairs signed-rank test). Conclusion: After a healing period of 9-10 months, the combination of DBBM and a collagen membrane is an effective treatment option for horizontal bone augmentation before implant placement. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154497
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.464
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.427
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHämmerle, CHFen_US
dc.contributor.authorJung, REen_US
dc.contributor.authorYaman, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:25:40Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:25:40Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2008, v. 19 n. 1, p. 19-25en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154497-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Lateral ridge augmentations are traditionally performed using autogenous bone grafts to support membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR). The bone-harvesting procedure, however, is accompanied by considerable patient morbidity. Aim: The aim of the present study was to test whether or not resorbable membranes and bone substitutes will lead to successful horizontal ridge augmentation allowing implant installation under standard conditions. Material and methods: Twelve patients in need of implant therapy participated in this study. They revealed bone deficits in the areas intended for implant placement. Soft tissue flaps were carefully raised and blocks or particles of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) (Bio-Oss®) were placed in the defect area. A collagenous membrane (Bio-Gide®) was applied to cover the DBBM and was fixed to the surrounding bone using poly-lactic acid pins. The flaps were sutured to allow for healing by primary intention. Results: All sites in the 12 patients healed uneventfully. No flap dehiscences and no exposures of membranes were observed. Nine to 10 months following augmentation surgery, flaps were raised in order to visualize the outcomes of the augmentation. An integration of the DBBM particles into the newly formed bone was consistently observed. Merely on the surface of the new bone, some pieces of the grafting material were only partly integrated into bone. However, these were not encapsulated by connective tissue but rather anchored into the newly regenerated bone. In all of the cases, but one, the bone volume following regeneration was adequate to place implants in a prosthetically ideal position and according to the standard protocol with complete bone coverage of the surface intended for osseointegration. Before the regenerative procedure, the average crestal bone width was 3.2 mm and to 6.9 mm at the time of implant placement. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.05, Wilcoxon's matched pairs signed-rank test). Conclusion: After a healing period of 9-10 months, the combination of DBBM and a collagen membrane is an effective treatment option for horizontal bone augmentation before implant placement. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 And Overen_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Ridge Augmentation - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Regenerationen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Substitutesen_US
dc.subject.meshCattleen_US
dc.subject.meshCollagenen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseousen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshGuided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMaxilla - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshMembranes, Artificialen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshMineralsen_US
dc.subject.meshSecond-Look Surgeryen_US
dc.titleRidge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: A report of twelve consecutive casesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01407.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17956571-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-37249081190en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-37249081190&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.spage19en_US
dc.identifier.epage25en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000251667600004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHämmerle, CHF=7005331848en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridJung, RE=7201892502en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYaman, D=35082964300en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.citeulike2135601-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats