File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants

TitleBacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants
Authors
Issue Date2007
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2007, v. 18 n. 4, p. 501-508 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Information on bacterial colonization immediately after dental implant insertion is limited. Aims: (1) To assess the early colonization on titanium implants immediately after placement and throughout the first 12 post-surgical weeks, (2) to compare the microbiota at interproximal subgingival implant and adjacent tooth sites. Material and methods: Subgingival plaque samples from implant and neighbouring teeth were studied by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization before surgery, 30 min after implant placement, and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. Results: Comparing bacterial loads at implant sites between 30 min after placement with 1-week data showed that only the levels of Veillonella parvula (P<0.05) differed with higher loads at week 1 post-surgically. Week 12 data demonstrated significantly higher bacterial loads for 15/40 species at tooth sites compared with pre-surgery (P-values varying between 0.05 and 0.01). Between the period immediately after surgery and 12 weeks at implant sites, 29/40 species was more commonly found at 12 weeks. Included among these bacteria at implant sites were Porphyromonas gingivalis (P<0.05), Tannerella forsythia, (P<0.01), and Treponema denticola (P<0.001). Immediately post-surgery 5.9% of implants, and 26.2% of teeth, and at week 12, 15% of implants, and 39.1% of teeth harbored Staphylococcus aureus. Comparing tooth and implant sites, significantly higher bacterial loads were found at tooth sites for 27/40 species after 30 min following implant placement. This difference increased to 35/40 species at 12 weeks post-surgically. Conclusions: Bacterial colonization occurred within 30 min after implant placement. Early colonization patterns differed between implant and tooth surfaces. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154478
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.464
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.427
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFürst, MMen_US
dc.contributor.authorSalvi, GEen_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.contributor.authorPersson, GRen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:25:33Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:25:33Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2007, v. 18 n. 4, p. 501-508en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154478-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Information on bacterial colonization immediately after dental implant insertion is limited. Aims: (1) To assess the early colonization on titanium implants immediately after placement and throughout the first 12 post-surgical weeks, (2) to compare the microbiota at interproximal subgingival implant and adjacent tooth sites. Material and methods: Subgingival plaque samples from implant and neighbouring teeth were studied by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization before surgery, 30 min after implant placement, and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. Results: Comparing bacterial loads at implant sites between 30 min after placement with 1-week data showed that only the levels of Veillonella parvula (P<0.05) differed with higher loads at week 1 post-surgically. Week 12 data demonstrated significantly higher bacterial loads for 15/40 species at tooth sites compared with pre-surgery (P-values varying between 0.05 and 0.01). Between the period immediately after surgery and 12 weeks at implant sites, 29/40 species was more commonly found at 12 weeks. Included among these bacteria at implant sites were Porphyromonas gingivalis (P<0.05), Tannerella forsythia, (P<0.01), and Treponema denticola (P<0.001). Immediately post-surgery 5.9% of implants, and 26.2% of teeth, and at week 12, 15% of implants, and 39.1% of teeth harbored Staphylococcus aureus. Comparing tooth and implant sites, significantly higher bacterial loads were found at tooth sites for 27/40 species after 30 min following implant placement. This difference increased to 35/40 species at 12 weeks post-surgically. Conclusions: Bacterial colonization occurred within 30 min after implant placement. Early colonization patterns differed between implant and tooth surfaces. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.subject.meshActinobacillus Actinomycetemcomitans - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.subject.meshBacteroides - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.subject.meshDna, Bacterial - Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseousen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implants - Microbiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Plaque - Microbiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshLactobacillus - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.subject.meshOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshPorphyromonas Gingivalis - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.subject.meshRoc Curveen_US
dc.subject.meshStaphylococcus Aureus - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.subject.meshStatistics, Nonparametricen_US
dc.subject.meshStreptococcus - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_US
dc.subject.meshTitaniumen_US
dc.subject.meshTooth - Microbiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshTreponema Denticola - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.titleBacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01381.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17501978-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-34547370260en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-34547370260&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.spage501en_US
dc.identifier.epage508en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000247904600013-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFürst, MM=17434245900en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSalvi, GE=35600695300en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPersson, GR=7101853867en_US
dc.identifier.citeulike1450745-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats