File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of Bio-Oss® on osseointegration of dental implants surrounded by circumferential bone defects of different dimensions: An experimental study in the dog

TitleEffect of Bio-Oss® on osseointegration of dental implants surrounded by circumferential bone defects of different dimensions: An experimental study in the dog
Authors
Issue Date2007
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2007, v. 18 n. 3, p. 304-310 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of gap width and graft placement on bone healing around implants placed in simulated extraction sockets of various widths in four Labrador dogs. Materials and Methods: Five Osseotite® implants per dog were placed in the mandible of four dogs. Two implants were inserted into sites with a 2.37 mm and two with a 1 mm gap present between the implants and bone around the coronal 6 mm of the implants in each dog. For one of each gap sizes, the gap was filled with Bio-Oss®, and the other two with blood alone. A fifth implant was inserted without a gap and used as a control. Ground sections were prepared from biopsies taken at 4 months and histometric measurements of osseointegration and bone between the threads made for the coronal 6 mm. Results: The medians for osseointegration ranged from 5.2 mm for control to 1-2.6 mm for the test modalities. There were significant differences for linear measurements of osseointegration (χ2 18.27; df 4; P=0.0011) and bone area within threads (χ2 23.4; df 4; P=0.0001) between test modalities. Conclusions: The results suggest that the wider the gap around the implants, the less favourable the histological outcome at short time intervals following treatment. They also infer that bone grafting with anorganic bovine bone xenograft seems to lead to a more favourable histological outcome for wider circumferential defects but not for narrower defects. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154471
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.464
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.427
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPolyzois, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorRenvert, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorBosshardt, DDen_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.contributor.authorClaffey, Nen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:25:30Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:25:30Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2007, v. 18 n. 3, p. 304-310en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154471-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of gap width and graft placement on bone healing around implants placed in simulated extraction sockets of various widths in four Labrador dogs. Materials and Methods: Five Osseotite® implants per dog were placed in the mandible of four dogs. Two implants were inserted into sites with a 2.37 mm and two with a 1 mm gap present between the implants and bone around the coronal 6 mm of the implants in each dog. For one of each gap sizes, the gap was filled with Bio-Oss®, and the other two with blood alone. A fifth implant was inserted without a gap and used as a control. Ground sections were prepared from biopsies taken at 4 months and histometric measurements of osseointegration and bone between the threads made for the coronal 6 mm. Results: The medians for osseointegration ranged from 5.2 mm for control to 1-2.6 mm for the test modalities. There were significant differences for linear measurements of osseointegration (χ2 18.27; df 4; P=0.0011) and bone area within threads (χ2 23.4; df 4; P=0.0001) between test modalities. Conclusions: The results suggest that the wider the gap around the implants, the less favourable the histological outcome at short time intervals following treatment. They also infer that bone grafting with anorganic bovine bone xenograft seems to lead to a more favourable histological outcome for wider circumferential defects but not for narrower defects. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Substitutes - Therapeutic Useen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Transplantation - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDogsen_US
dc.subject.meshMinerals - Therapeutic Useen_US
dc.subject.meshOsseointegration - Drug Effectsen_US
dc.titleEffect of Bio-Oss® on osseointegration of dental implants surrounded by circumferential bone defects of different dimensions: An experimental study in the dogen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01207.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17298496-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-34547178743en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-34547178743&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.spage304en_US
dc.identifier.epage310en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000247240800006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPolyzois, I=23135845900en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridRenvert, S=7004228774en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBosshardt, DD=6603806230en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridClaffey, N=7003866539en_US
dc.identifier.citeulike1313240-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats