File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Survival rate of zygomatic implants in atrophic or partially resected maxillae prior to functional loading: A retrospective clinical report

TitleSurvival rate of zygomatic implants in atrophic or partially resected maxillae prior to functional loading: A retrospective clinical report
Authors
Issue Date2006
PublisherQuintessence Publishing Co, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/gp.php?journal_name=OMI&name_abbr=IJOMI
Citation
International Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Implants, 2006, v. 21 n. 3, p. 413-420 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the survival rate of 34 remote anchorage implants placed in 18 patients from placement to uncovering, prior to any prosthetic loading. Materials and Methods: A total of 18 patients (9 women and 9 men with a mean age of 63 years) who required rehabilitation with a fixed prosthesis because of severely atrophic maxillae (including 1 patient who had undergone primary and secondary cleft lip and palate repair), traumatic maxillary bone loss, and maxillectomy procedures received 1 or 2 zygomatic implants and 2 to 4 standard maxillary dental implants. The survival rate of the 34 zygomatic implants from placement to uncovering was investigated. Aspects of the placement technique or postoperative complications related to surgical procedures likely to affect the implant failure rate were detected and critically discussed. Results: Osseointegration was evaluated using the reverse torque test and percussion after uncovering. Only 1 patient (5.6%) sustained postoperative clinical complications during the evaluation period which resulted in the loss of both zygomatic implants (5.9%). Conclusion: Although the handling of this anchorage implant system is somewhat complex, and the design has certain shortcomings, it might be an alternative to more extensive bone augmentation procedures. However, rehabilitation of partially or completely edentulous patients with fixed implant-supported prosthesis is only feasible when 2 to 4 standard implants are placed in the anterior maxilla and splinted with the zygomatic implants.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154409
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.859
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.671
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZwahlen, RAen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrätz, KWen_US
dc.contributor.authorOechslin, CKen_US
dc.contributor.authorStuder, SPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:25:09Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:25:09Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Implants, 2006, v. 21 n. 3, p. 413-420en_US
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154409-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the survival rate of 34 remote anchorage implants placed in 18 patients from placement to uncovering, prior to any prosthetic loading. Materials and Methods: A total of 18 patients (9 women and 9 men with a mean age of 63 years) who required rehabilitation with a fixed prosthesis because of severely atrophic maxillae (including 1 patient who had undergone primary and secondary cleft lip and palate repair), traumatic maxillary bone loss, and maxillectomy procedures received 1 or 2 zygomatic implants and 2 to 4 standard maxillary dental implants. The survival rate of the 34 zygomatic implants from placement to uncovering was investigated. Aspects of the placement technique or postoperative complications related to surgical procedures likely to affect the implant failure rate were detected and critically discussed. Results: Osseointegration was evaluated using the reverse torque test and percussion after uncovering. Only 1 patient (5.6%) sustained postoperative clinical complications during the evaluation period which resulted in the loss of both zygomatic implants (5.9%). Conclusion: Although the handling of this anchorage implant system is somewhat complex, and the design has certain shortcomings, it might be an alternative to more extensive bone augmentation procedures. However, rehabilitation of partially or completely edentulous patients with fixed implant-supported prosthesis is only feasible when 2 to 4 standard implants are placed in the anterior maxilla and splinted with the zygomatic implants.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/gp.php?journal_name=OMI&name_abbr=IJOMIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantsen_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 And Overen_US
dc.subject.meshAtrophy - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMaxilla - Pathology - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshMaxillofacial Prosthesisen_US
dc.subject.meshMaxillofacial Prosthesis Implantation - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshWeight-Bearingen_US
dc.subject.meshZygomaen_US
dc.titleSurvival rate of zygomatic implants in atrophic or partially resected maxillae prior to functional loading: A retrospective clinical reporten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailZwahlen, RA:zwahlen@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityZwahlen, RA=rp00055en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid16796284-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33745508684en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33745508684&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.spage413en_US
dc.identifier.epage420en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000238591900010-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZwahlen, RA=7004217269en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridGrätz, KW=7005383755en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridOechslin, CK=6603300829en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridStuder, SP=7004653526en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats