File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01190.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33645048187
- PMID: 16441781
- WOS: WOS:000234854400003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparisons of bacterial patterns present at implant and tooth sites in subjects on supportive periodontal therapy: I. Impact of clinical variables, gender and smoking
Title | Comparisons of bacterial patterns present at implant and tooth sites in subjects on supportive periodontal therapy: I. Impact of clinical variables, gender and smoking |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Bleeding on probing DNA checkerboard Implant Microflora Pocket probing depth Smoking |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR |
Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2006, v. 17 n. 1, p. 18-24 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: (I) To compare the oral microflora at implant and tooth sites in subjects participating in a periodontal recall program, (II) to test whether the microflora at implant and tooth sites differ as an effect of gingival bleeding (bleeding on probing (BOP)), or pocket probing depth (PPD), and (III) to test whether smoking and gender had an impact on the microflora. Material and methods: Data were collected from 127 implants and all teeth in 56 subjects. Microbiological data were identified by the DNA-DNA checkerboard hybridization. Results: PPD≥4 mm were found in 16.9% of tooth, and at 26.6% of implant sites (P<0.01). Tooth sites with PPD≥4 mm had a 3.1-fold higher bacterial load than implant sites (mean difference: 66%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 40.7-91.3, P<0.001). No differences were found for the red, orange, green, and yellow complexes. A higher total bacterial load was found at implant sites with PPD≥4 mm (mean difference 35.7 × 105, 95% CI: 5.2 (105) to 66.1 (105), P<0.02 with equal variance not assumed). At implant sites, BOP had no impact on bacterial load but influenced the load at tooth sites (P<0.01). Conclusion: BOP, and smoking had no impact on bacteria at implant sites but influenced the bacterial load at tooth sites. Tooth sites harbored more bacteria than implant sites with comparable PPD. The 4 mm PPD cutoff level influenced the distribution and amounts of bacterial loads. The subject factor is explanatory to bacterial load at both tooth and implant sites. Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2006. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154392 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Agerbaek, MR | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Persson, GR | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:25:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:25:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2006, v. 17 n. 1, p. 18-24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154392 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: (I) To compare the oral microflora at implant and tooth sites in subjects participating in a periodontal recall program, (II) to test whether the microflora at implant and tooth sites differ as an effect of gingival bleeding (bleeding on probing (BOP)), or pocket probing depth (PPD), and (III) to test whether smoking and gender had an impact on the microflora. Material and methods: Data were collected from 127 implants and all teeth in 56 subjects. Microbiological data were identified by the DNA-DNA checkerboard hybridization. Results: PPD≥4 mm were found in 16.9% of tooth, and at 26.6% of implant sites (P<0.01). Tooth sites with PPD≥4 mm had a 3.1-fold higher bacterial load than implant sites (mean difference: 66%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 40.7-91.3, P<0.001). No differences were found for the red, orange, green, and yellow complexes. A higher total bacterial load was found at implant sites with PPD≥4 mm (mean difference 35.7 × 105, 95% CI: 5.2 (105) to 66.1 (105), P<0.02 with equal variance not assumed). At implant sites, BOP had no impact on bacterial load but influenced the load at tooth sites (P<0.01). Conclusion: BOP, and smoking had no impact on bacteria at implant sites but influenced the bacterial load at tooth sites. Tooth sites harbored more bacteria than implant sites with comparable PPD. The 4 mm PPD cutoff level influenced the distribution and amounts of bacterial loads. The subject factor is explanatory to bacterial load at both tooth and implant sites. Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2006. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_US |
dc.subject | Bleeding on probing | - |
dc.subject | DNA checkerboard | - |
dc.subject | Implant | - |
dc.subject | Microflora | - |
dc.subject | Pocket probing depth | - |
dc.subject | Smoking | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Bacteria - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dna, Bacterial - Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants - Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Prophylaxis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Linear Models | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Nucleic Acid Hybridization - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Periodontal Index | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Periodontal Pocket - Etiology - Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Periodontitis - Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Sex Factors | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Smoking - Adverse Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Statistics, Nonparametric | en_US |
dc.title | Comparisons of bacterial patterns present at implant and tooth sites in subjects on supportive periodontal therapy: I. Impact of clinical variables, gender and smoking | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01190.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16441781 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33645048187 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33645048187&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 17 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 18 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000234854400003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Agerbaek, MR=12787694200 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Persson, GR=7101853867 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 479720 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0905-7161 | - |