File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01197.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33645047674
- PMID: 16441779
- WOS: WOS:000234854400001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparison of bacterial plaque samples from titanium implant and tooth surfaces by different methods
Title | Comparison of bacterial plaque samples from titanium implant and tooth surfaces by different methods |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Biofilm DNA-DNA hybridization Sampling method Titanium implant Tooth |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR |
Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2006, v. 17 n. 1, p. 1-7 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Studies have shown similarities in the microflora between titanium implants or tooth sites when samples are taken by gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) sampling methods. The purpose of the present study was to study the microflora from curette and GCF samples using the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method to assess the microflora of patients who had at least one oral osseo-integrated implant and who were otherwise dentate. Plaque samples were taken from tooth/implant surfaces and from sulcular gingival surfaces with curettes, and from gingival fluid using filter papers. A total of 28 subjects (11 females) were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the subjects was 64.1 years (SD±4.7). On average, the implants studied had been in function for 3.7 years (SD±2.9). The proportion of Streptococcus oralis (P<0.02) and Fusobacterium periodonticum (P<0.02) was significantly higher at tooth sites (curette samples). The GCF samples yielded higher proportions for 28/40 species studies (P-values varying between 0.05 and 0.001). The proportions of Tannerella forsythia (T. forsythensis), and Treponema denticola were both higher in GCF samples (P<0.02 and P<0.05, respectively) than in curette samples (implant sites). The microbial composition in gingival fluid from samples taken at implant sites differed partly from that of curette samples taken from implant surfaces or from sulcular soft tissues, providing higher counts for most bacteria studied at implant surfaces, but with the exception of Porphyromonas gingivalis. A combination of GCF and curette sampling methods might be the most representative sample method. Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2006. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154391 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gerber, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wenaweser, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | HeitzMayfield, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rutger Persson, G | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:25:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:25:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2006, v. 17 n. 1, p. 1-7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154391 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Studies have shown similarities in the microflora between titanium implants or tooth sites when samples are taken by gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) sampling methods. The purpose of the present study was to study the microflora from curette and GCF samples using the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method to assess the microflora of patients who had at least one oral osseo-integrated implant and who were otherwise dentate. Plaque samples were taken from tooth/implant surfaces and from sulcular gingival surfaces with curettes, and from gingival fluid using filter papers. A total of 28 subjects (11 females) were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the subjects was 64.1 years (SD±4.7). On average, the implants studied had been in function for 3.7 years (SD±2.9). The proportion of Streptococcus oralis (P<0.02) and Fusobacterium periodonticum (P<0.02) was significantly higher at tooth sites (curette samples). The GCF samples yielded higher proportions for 28/40 species studies (P-values varying between 0.05 and 0.001). The proportions of Tannerella forsythia (T. forsythensis), and Treponema denticola were both higher in GCF samples (P<0.02 and P<0.05, respectively) than in curette samples (implant sites). The microbial composition in gingival fluid from samples taken at implant sites differed partly from that of curette samples taken from implant surfaces or from sulcular soft tissues, providing higher counts for most bacteria studied at implant surfaces, but with the exception of Porphyromonas gingivalis. A combination of GCF and curette sampling methods might be the most representative sample method. Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2006. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_US |
dc.subject | Biofilm | - |
dc.subject | DNA-DNA hybridization | - |
dc.subject | Sampling method | - |
dc.subject | Titanium implant | - |
dc.subject | Tooth | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Bacteroides - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Colony Count, Microbial | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cross-Sectional Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dna, Bacterial - Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants - Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Plaque - Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Gingival Crevicular Fluid - Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Nucleic Acid Hybridization - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Porphyromonas Gingivalis - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Specimen Handling - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Statistics, Nonparametric | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Streptococcus Oralis - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Subgingival Curettage | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Titanium | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Tooth Root - Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Treponema Denticola - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of bacterial plaque samples from titanium implant and tooth surfaces by different methods | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01197.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16441779 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33645047674 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33645047674&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 17 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000234854400001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Gerber, J=12787506800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wenaweser, D=12786525100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | HeitzMayfield, L=6602309146 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Rutger Persson, G=6507743898 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 479722 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0905-7161 | - |