File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Initial adhesion of glass-fiber-reinforced composite to the surface of porcine calvarial bone

TitleInitial adhesion of glass-fiber-reinforced composite to the surface of porcine calvarial bone
Authors
Issue Date2005
Citation
Journal Of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, 2005, v. 75 n. 2, p. 334-342 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of this preliminary study was to compare the initial bond strength of the glass-fiber-reinforced composite veil to the surface of the porcine calvarial compact bone using different adhesives. Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) made of E-glass fiber veil with the BisGMA-PMMA resin system was used in the study. For the shear bond strength test, porcine calvarial bone cubes were mounted into resin matrix. FRC-veil discs were bonded to compact bone with different types of adhesives: (A) BisGMA-HEMA based (3M-ESPE Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive), (B) 4-META/UDMA/BisGMA based (Unifil Bond Bonding Agent) and MDP based (Clearfil Se Bond adhesive), (C) UBMA/BisGMA/PMMA-based experimental adhesive, and (D) silane-based (APS, ICS, MPS) experimental adhesives. The surface of the bone was mechanically roughened and was either used as such, treated with dental primers (Unifil Bond Self-etching Primer, Clearfil Se Bond Primer), or treated with an experimental silane mixture (APS, ICS, MPS), or with a mixture of the experimental silane liquid and Clearfil Se Bond Primer. The 3M-ESPE Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive and UDMA/ BisGMA/PMMA experimental adhesive gave poor results in the shear bond test (0.58 and 0.40 MPa, respectively). Unifil Bond Bonding Agent and Clearfil Se Bond adhesive with respective primers markedly improved the shear bond strength; with Unifil the result was 3.40 MPa, and with Clearfil it was 6.19 MPa. When the bone surface was primed with a mixture of Clearfil Se Bond Primer and Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator, the Clearfil Se Bond adhesive-impregnated FRC veil gave the best adhesion to the bone surface in this test: 9.50 MPa. The addition of bioactive glass granules between the veil and the bone lowered the shear bond strength in the test system described above to 6.72 MPa. The test systems with the silane mixture were also promising. In the SEM study, it was found that the mechanical treatment reveals the pores of the bone surface. Chemical treatments of the bone surface improved the adhesion of the FRC veil to the bone. The results showed that the adhesion of the FRC to the surface of the bone can be significantly improved with mechanical roughening and with special chemical treatments of the bone surface. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154369
ISSN
2004 Impact Factor: 3.652
2006 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.474
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTuusa, SMRen_US
dc.contributor.authorLassila, LVJen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatinlinna, JPen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeltola, MJen_US
dc.contributor.authorVallittu, PKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:24:55Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:24:55Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, 2005, v. 75 n. 2, p. 334-342en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-9304en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154369-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this preliminary study was to compare the initial bond strength of the glass-fiber-reinforced composite veil to the surface of the porcine calvarial compact bone using different adhesives. Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) made of E-glass fiber veil with the BisGMA-PMMA resin system was used in the study. For the shear bond strength test, porcine calvarial bone cubes were mounted into resin matrix. FRC-veil discs were bonded to compact bone with different types of adhesives: (A) BisGMA-HEMA based (3M-ESPE Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive), (B) 4-META/UDMA/BisGMA based (Unifil Bond Bonding Agent) and MDP based (Clearfil Se Bond adhesive), (C) UBMA/BisGMA/PMMA-based experimental adhesive, and (D) silane-based (APS, ICS, MPS) experimental adhesives. The surface of the bone was mechanically roughened and was either used as such, treated with dental primers (Unifil Bond Self-etching Primer, Clearfil Se Bond Primer), or treated with an experimental silane mixture (APS, ICS, MPS), or with a mixture of the experimental silane liquid and Clearfil Se Bond Primer. The 3M-ESPE Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive and UDMA/ BisGMA/PMMA experimental adhesive gave poor results in the shear bond test (0.58 and 0.40 MPa, respectively). Unifil Bond Bonding Agent and Clearfil Se Bond adhesive with respective primers markedly improved the shear bond strength; with Unifil the result was 3.40 MPa, and with Clearfil it was 6.19 MPa. When the bone surface was primed with a mixture of Clearfil Se Bond Primer and Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator, the Clearfil Se Bond adhesive-impregnated FRC veil gave the best adhesion to the bone surface in this test: 9.50 MPa. The addition of bioactive glass granules between the veil and the bone lowered the shear bond strength in the test system described above to 6.72 MPa. The test systems with the silane mixture were also promising. In the SEM study, it was found that the mechanical treatment reveals the pores of the bone surface. Chemical treatments of the bone surface improved the adhesion of the FRC veil to the bone. The results showed that the adhesion of the FRC to the surface of the bone can be significantly improved with mechanical roughening and with special chemical treatments of the bone surface. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterialsen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshBiocompatible Materialsen_US
dc.subject.meshGlassen_US
dc.subject.meshMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningen_US
dc.subject.meshShear Strengthen_US
dc.subject.meshSilanesen_US
dc.subject.meshSkull - Physiology - Ultrastructureen_US
dc.subject.meshSurface Propertiesen_US
dc.subject.meshSwineen_US
dc.subject.meshTissue Adhesivesen_US
dc.subject.meshTissue Culture Techniquesen_US
dc.titleInitial adhesion of glass-fiber-reinforced composite to the surface of porcine calvarial boneen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailMatinlinna, JP:jpmat@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityMatinlinna, JP=rp00052en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jbm.b.30311en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16032653-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-27744483803en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-27744483803&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume75en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.spage334en_US
dc.identifier.epage342en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000233059600014-
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTuusa, SMR=9238432200en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLassila, LVJ=6603761779en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMatinlinna, JP=6602419428en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPeltola, MJ=7003398817en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridVallittu, PK=7006138548en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats