File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/jbm.b.30311
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-27744483803
- PMID: 16032653
- WOS: WOS:000233059600014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Initial adhesion of glass-fiber-reinforced composite to the surface of porcine calvarial bone
Title | Initial adhesion of glass-fiber-reinforced composite to the surface of porcine calvarial bone |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Adhesive Bone FRC Primer Silane |
Issue Date | 2005 |
Citation | Journal Of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, 2005, v. 75 n. 2, p. 334-342 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The aim of this preliminary study was to compare the initial bond strength of the glass-fiber-reinforced composite veil to the surface of the porcine calvarial compact bone using different adhesives. Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) made of E-glass fiber veil with the BisGMA-PMMA resin system was used in the study. For the shear bond strength test, porcine calvarial bone cubes were mounted into resin matrix. FRC-veil discs were bonded to compact bone with different types of adhesives: (A) BisGMA-HEMA based (3M-ESPE Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive), (B) 4-META/UDMA/BisGMA based (Unifil Bond Bonding Agent) and MDP based (Clearfil Se Bond adhesive), (C) UBMA/BisGMA/PMMA-based experimental adhesive, and (D) silane-based (APS, ICS, MPS) experimental adhesives. The surface of the bone was mechanically roughened and was either used as such, treated with dental primers (Unifil Bond Self-etching Primer, Clearfil Se Bond Primer), or treated with an experimental silane mixture (APS, ICS, MPS), or with a mixture of the experimental silane liquid and Clearfil Se Bond Primer. The 3M-ESPE Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive and UDMA/ BisGMA/PMMA experimental adhesive gave poor results in the shear bond test (0.58 and 0.40 MPa, respectively). Unifil Bond Bonding Agent and Clearfil Se Bond adhesive with respective primers markedly improved the shear bond strength; with Unifil the result was 3.40 MPa, and with Clearfil it was 6.19 MPa. When the bone surface was primed with a mixture of Clearfil Se Bond Primer and Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator, the Clearfil Se Bond adhesive-impregnated FRC veil gave the best adhesion to the bone surface in this test: 9.50 MPa. The addition of bioactive glass granules between the veil and the bone lowered the shear bond strength in the test system described above to 6.72 MPa. The test systems with the silane mixture were also promising. In the SEM study, it was found that the mechanical treatment reveals the pores of the bone surface. Chemical treatments of the bone surface improved the adhesion of the FRC veil to the bone. The results showed that the adhesion of the FRC to the surface of the bone can be significantly improved with mechanical roughening and with special chemical treatments of the bone surface. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154369 |
ISSN | 2019 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.125 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tuusa, SMR | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lassila, LVJ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Matinlinna, JP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Peltola, MJ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vallittu, PK | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:24:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:24:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, 2005, v. 75 n. 2, p. 334-342 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-9304 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154369 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this preliminary study was to compare the initial bond strength of the glass-fiber-reinforced composite veil to the surface of the porcine calvarial compact bone using different adhesives. Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) made of E-glass fiber veil with the BisGMA-PMMA resin system was used in the study. For the shear bond strength test, porcine calvarial bone cubes were mounted into resin matrix. FRC-veil discs were bonded to compact bone with different types of adhesives: (A) BisGMA-HEMA based (3M-ESPE Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive), (B) 4-META/UDMA/BisGMA based (Unifil Bond Bonding Agent) and MDP based (Clearfil Se Bond adhesive), (C) UBMA/BisGMA/PMMA-based experimental adhesive, and (D) silane-based (APS, ICS, MPS) experimental adhesives. The surface of the bone was mechanically roughened and was either used as such, treated with dental primers (Unifil Bond Self-etching Primer, Clearfil Se Bond Primer), or treated with an experimental silane mixture (APS, ICS, MPS), or with a mixture of the experimental silane liquid and Clearfil Se Bond Primer. The 3M-ESPE Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive and UDMA/ BisGMA/PMMA experimental adhesive gave poor results in the shear bond test (0.58 and 0.40 MPa, respectively). Unifil Bond Bonding Agent and Clearfil Se Bond adhesive with respective primers markedly improved the shear bond strength; with Unifil the result was 3.40 MPa, and with Clearfil it was 6.19 MPa. When the bone surface was primed with a mixture of Clearfil Se Bond Primer and Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator, the Clearfil Se Bond adhesive-impregnated FRC veil gave the best adhesion to the bone surface in this test: 9.50 MPa. The addition of bioactive glass granules between the veil and the bone lowered the shear bond strength in the test system described above to 6.72 MPa. The test systems with the silane mixture were also promising. In the SEM study, it was found that the mechanical treatment reveals the pores of the bone surface. Chemical treatments of the bone surface improved the adhesion of the FRC veil to the bone. The results showed that the adhesion of the FRC to the surface of the bone can be significantly improved with mechanical roughening and with special chemical treatments of the bone surface. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials | en_US |
dc.subject | Adhesive | - |
dc.subject | Bone | - |
dc.subject | FRC | - |
dc.subject | Primer | - |
dc.subject | Silane | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Animals | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Biocompatible Materials | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Glass | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Microscopy, Electron, Scanning | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Shear Strength | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Silanes | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Skull - Physiology - Ultrastructure | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Surface Properties | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Swine | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Tissue Adhesives | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Tissue Culture Techniques | en_US |
dc.title | Initial adhesion of glass-fiber-reinforced composite to the surface of porcine calvarial bone | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Matinlinna, JP:jpmat@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Matinlinna, JP=rp00052 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/jbm.b.30311 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16032653 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-27744483803 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-27744483803&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 75 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 334 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 342 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000233059600014 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tuusa, SMR=9238432200 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lassila, LVJ=6603761779 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Matinlinna, JP=6602419428 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Peltola, MJ=7003398817 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Vallittu, PK=7006138548 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0021-9304 | - |