File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Retrospective survival analysis of 3-unit fixed-fixed and 2-unit cantilever fixed partial dentures

TitleRetrospective survival analysis of 3-unit fixed-fixed and 2-unit cantilever fixed partial dentures
Authors
KeywordsFixed partial dentures
Issue Date2005
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd.
Citation
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2005, v. 32 n. 10, p. 759-765 How to Cite?
AbstractTo evaluate the cumulative survival (CS) rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) retained by full-veneer retainers, and those of resin-bonded FPDs provided by graduating dental students for the replacement of a single missing tooth. In 168 patients, 61 3-unit fixed-fixed FPDs and 25 2-unit cantilevered FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers, and 77 3-unit fixed-fixed resin-bonded FPDs and 47 2-unit cantilevered resin-bonded FPDs, were examined for their retention and integrity. The periodontal health, endodontic status and coronal tissues of all abutment teeth were also evaluated. The survival rates of these various designs were analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method. The mean age of all FPDs was 31 months. At 48 months after their insertion, 3-unit FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers had a CS rate of 82%, followed by 2-unit resin-bonded FPDs at 81%, 2-unit FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers at 77%, and 3-unit resin-bonded FPDs at 63%. No significant difference was found between the four designs (P>0.05). Up to both 48 and 60 months, the most common causes of failure were endodontic for FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers, and dislodgement for resin-bonded FPDs. The 3-unit fixed-fixed FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers had the most favourable prognosis after 48 months for replacing a single missing tooth, but the difference between designs was not statistically significant.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154364
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.958
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChai, JYCen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChu, FCSen_HK
dc.contributor.authorNewsome, PRHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChow, TWen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:24:54Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:24:54Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2005, v. 32 n. 10, p. 759-765en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0305-182Xen_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154364-
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the cumulative survival (CS) rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) retained by full-veneer retainers, and those of resin-bonded FPDs provided by graduating dental students for the replacement of a single missing tooth. In 168 patients, 61 3-unit fixed-fixed FPDs and 25 2-unit cantilevered FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers, and 77 3-unit fixed-fixed resin-bonded FPDs and 47 2-unit cantilevered resin-bonded FPDs, were examined for their retention and integrity. The periodontal health, endodontic status and coronal tissues of all abutment teeth were also evaluated. The survival rates of these various designs were analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method. The mean age of all FPDs was 31 months. At 48 months after their insertion, 3-unit FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers had a CS rate of 82%, followed by 2-unit resin-bonded FPDs at 81%, 2-unit FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers at 77%, and 3-unit resin-bonded FPDs at 63%. No significant difference was found between the four designs (P>0.05). Up to both 48 and 60 months, the most common causes of failure were endodontic for FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers, and dislodgement for resin-bonded FPDs. The 3-unit fixed-fixed FPDs retained by full-veneer retainers had the most favourable prognosis after 48 months for replacing a single missing tooth, but the difference between designs was not statistically significant.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd.-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Rehabilitationen_HK
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com-
dc.subjectFixed partial denturesen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Preparation, Prosthodontic - Methods - Standardsen_US
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshStudents, Dentalen_US
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshMolaren_US
dc.subject.meshIncisoren_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshDenture, Partial, Fixed, Resin-Bondeden_US
dc.subject.meshDenture, Partial, Fixed - Standardsen_US
dc.subject.meshDenture Designen_US
dc.subject.meshBicuspiden_US
dc.subject.meshCuspiden_US
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis Designen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration Failureen_US
dc.subject.meshDenture, Partial, Fixed - standardsen_US
dc.titleRetrospective survival analysis of 3-unit fixed-fixed and 2-unit cantilever fixed partial denturesen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailChai, JYC: johnchai@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailChu, FCS: cschu@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailNewsome, PRH: newsome@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailChow, TW: twchow@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChu, FCS=rp00035en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityNewsome, PRH=rp00017en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityChow, TW=rp00009en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01495.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid16159355-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-25844525524en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros103050-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-25844525524&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume32en_HK
dc.identifier.issue10en_HK
dc.identifier.spage759en_HK
dc.identifier.epage765en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000231825600010-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChow, TW=7203012369en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNewsome, PRH=35830103400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChu, FCS=7201881096en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChai, J=7202678911en_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike319734-
dc.identifier.issnl0305-182X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats