File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290407.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-17444441197
- PMID: 11966929
- WOS: WOS:000174670900007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects: A multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial
Title | Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects: A multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Differentiation Factors Intrabony Defects Periodontal Regeneration Periodontal Surgery Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
Issue Date | 2002 |
Publisher | Blackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPE |
Citation | Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, 2002, v. 29 n. 4, p. 317-325 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Aim: This prospective multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of papilla preservation flap surgery with or without the application of enamel matrix proteins (EMD). Material and methods: 172 patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were recruited in 12 centers in 7 countries. All patients had at least one intrabony defect of ≥3mm. Heavy smokers (≥20 cigarettes/day) were excluded. The surgical procedures included access for root instrumentation using either the simplified or the modified papilla preservation flap in order to obtain optimal tissue adaptation and primary closure. After debridement, roots were conditioned for 2 min with a gel containing 24% EDTA. EMD was applied in the test subjects, and omitted in the controls. Postsurgically, a strict plaque control protocol was followed. At baseline and 1 year following the interventions, clinical attachment levels (CAL), pocket probing depths (PPD), recession (REC), full-mouth plaque scores and full-mouth bleeding scores were assessed. A total of 166 patients were available for the 1-year follow-up. Results: At baseline, 86 test and 86 control patients presented with similar subject and defect characteristics. On average, the test defects gained 3.1 ± 1.5 mm of CAL, while the control defects yielded a significantly lower CAL gain of 2.5 ± 1.5 mm. Pocket reduction was also significantly higher in the test group (3.9 ± 1.7 mm) when compared to the controls (3.3 ± 1.7 mm). A multivariate analysis indicated that the treatment, the clinical centers, cigarette smoking, baseline PPD, and defect corticalisation significantly influenced CAL gains. A frequency distribution analysis of the studied outcomes indicated that EMD increased the predictability of clinically significant results (CAL gains ≥4 mm) and decreased the probability of obtaining negligible or no gains in CAL (CAL gains <2 mm). Conclusions: The results of this trial indicated that regenerative periodontal surgery with EMD offers an additional benefit in terms of CAL gains, PPD reductions and predictability of outcomes with respect to papilla preservation flaps alone. © Blackwell Munksgaard, 2002. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154312 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tonetti, MS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cortellini, P | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Suvan, JE | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Adriaens, P | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dubravec, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fonzar, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fourmousis, I | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mayfield, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rossi, R | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Silvestri, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tiedemann, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Topoll, H | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vangsted, T | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wallkamm, B | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:24:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:24:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, 2002, v. 29 n. 4, p. 317-325 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0303-6979 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154312 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: This prospective multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of papilla preservation flap surgery with or without the application of enamel matrix proteins (EMD). Material and methods: 172 patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were recruited in 12 centers in 7 countries. All patients had at least one intrabony defect of ≥3mm. Heavy smokers (≥20 cigarettes/day) were excluded. The surgical procedures included access for root instrumentation using either the simplified or the modified papilla preservation flap in order to obtain optimal tissue adaptation and primary closure. After debridement, roots were conditioned for 2 min with a gel containing 24% EDTA. EMD was applied in the test subjects, and omitted in the controls. Postsurgically, a strict plaque control protocol was followed. At baseline and 1 year following the interventions, clinical attachment levels (CAL), pocket probing depths (PPD), recession (REC), full-mouth plaque scores and full-mouth bleeding scores were assessed. A total of 166 patients were available for the 1-year follow-up. Results: At baseline, 86 test and 86 control patients presented with similar subject and defect characteristics. On average, the test defects gained 3.1 ± 1.5 mm of CAL, while the control defects yielded a significantly lower CAL gain of 2.5 ± 1.5 mm. Pocket reduction was also significantly higher in the test group (3.9 ± 1.7 mm) when compared to the controls (3.3 ± 1.7 mm). A multivariate analysis indicated that the treatment, the clinical centers, cigarette smoking, baseline PPD, and defect corticalisation significantly influenced CAL gains. A frequency distribution analysis of the studied outcomes indicated that EMD increased the predictability of clinically significant results (CAL gains ≥4 mm) and decreased the probability of obtaining negligible or no gains in CAL (CAL gains <2 mm). Conclusions: The results of this trial indicated that regenerative periodontal surgery with EMD offers an additional benefit in terms of CAL gains, PPD reductions and predictability of outcomes with respect to papilla preservation flaps alone. © Blackwell Munksgaard, 2002. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPE | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Periodontology | en_US |
dc.subject | Differentiation Factors | en_US |
dc.subject | Intrabony Defects | en_US |
dc.subject | Periodontal Regeneration | en_US |
dc.subject | Periodontal Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial | en_US |
dc.title | Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects: A multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290407.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 11966929 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-17444441197 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-17444441197&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 317 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 325 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000174670900007 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Denmark | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tonetti, MS=35602248900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cortellini, P=7004422576 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Suvan, JE=19637686000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Adriaens, P=7007006026 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Dubravec, D=36963026500 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fonzar, A=6506961336 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fourmousis, I=6602718088 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Mayfield, L=7004160753 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Rossi, R=8061093400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Silvestri, M=7006617344 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tiedemann, C=6603143268 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Topoll, H=7004437263 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Vangsted, T=6508378968 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wallkamm, B=6603265034 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0303-6979 | - |