File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Retrospective study of orthodontic bonding without liquid resin

TitleRetrospective study of orthodontic bonding without liquid resin
Authors
Issue Date2000
PublisherMosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajodo
Citation
American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2000, v. 118 n. 3, p. 300-306 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the retention of fixed orthodontic appliances bonded without liquid resin with the use of a retrospective study design. Patients from each of 2 consultant orthodontists in the same specialty clinic were chosen under strict selection criteria. In the test group (n = 37), composite material (Phase II) without liquid resin was used to bond full arch fixed appliances onto patients' upper teeth. Patients' appliances, which were bonded with Phase II composite and liquid resin, were used as the control group (n = 37). The duration of the appliance survival, from the date of appliance bonding to the date of first accidental bracket loss, was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier product limit method and log-rank test. Our data suggested that supragingival orthodontic metal brackets seemed to bond on healthy enamel surfaces and to work equally well either with or without the use of liquid resin. The total percentages of bond failure, roughly 6%, were similar in both test and control groups. Approximately 73% of all patients in the test group and 57% of the patients in the control group experienced no bond failure at all throughout the entire course of treatment.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154242
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.69
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.249
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTang, ATHen_US
dc.contributor.authorBjörkman, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorIsaksson, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorLindbäck, KFen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndlinSobocki, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorEkstrand, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:24:08Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:24:08Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2000, v. 118 n. 3, p. 300-306en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154242-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the retention of fixed orthodontic appliances bonded without liquid resin with the use of a retrospective study design. Patients from each of 2 consultant orthodontists in the same specialty clinic were chosen under strict selection criteria. In the test group (n = 37), composite material (Phase II) without liquid resin was used to bond full arch fixed appliances onto patients' upper teeth. Patients' appliances, which were bonded with Phase II composite and liquid resin, were used as the control group (n = 37). The duration of the appliance survival, from the date of appliance bonding to the date of first accidental bracket loss, was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier product limit method and log-rank test. Our data suggested that supragingival orthodontic metal brackets seemed to bond on healthy enamel surfaces and to work equally well either with or without the use of liquid resin. The total percentages of bond failure, roughly 6%, were similar in both test and control groups. Approximately 73% of all patients in the test group and 57% of the patients in the control group experienced no bond failure at all throughout the entire course of treatment.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherMosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajodoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshChilden_US
dc.subject.meshDental Bonding - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshOrthodontic Bracketsen_US
dc.subject.meshResin Cements - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshResins, Syntheticen_US
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_US
dc.titleRetrospective study of orthodontic bonding without liquid resinen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailTang, ATH:athtang@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityTang, ATH=rp00054en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1067/mod.2000.103772en_US
dc.identifier.pmid10982931en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0040431519en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0040431519&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume118en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.spage300en_US
dc.identifier.epage306en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000089330200010-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTang, ATH=7201843899en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBjörkman, L=7003954336en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridIsaksson, L=7005207913en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLindbäck, KF=6505903671en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridAndlinSobocki, A=6603174708en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridEkstrand, J=7005484046en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats