File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Diagnostic characteristics of clinical and microbiological tests for monitoring periodontal and peri-implant mucosal tissue conditions during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT)

TitleDiagnostic characteristics of clinical and microbiological tests for monitoring periodontal and peri-implant mucosal tissue conditions during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT)
Authors
KeywordsBleeding on probing
CADIA (computer assisted densitometric image analysis)
Diagnosis
Digital subtraction radiography
Microbiological tests
Peri-implantitis
Periodontal disease
Issue Date2000
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2000, v. 11 n. 6, p. 521-529 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate a clinical and a microbiological test for monitoring tissue condition during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) and to compare their diagnostic characteristics at implant and tooth sites. Twelve female (age: 37-72 years) and 7 male patients (age: 26-83 years) were evaluated in this study on the basis of availability to follow a rigid SPT program. Patients had received a complete periodontal examination at 1 and 5 years after implant placement. This included standardized radiographs obtained at implants and matching control teeth. One implant site and one tooth site per patient were followed during the last 2 years of the SPT program. At each recall visit microbiological samples were analyzed according to DNA/RNA analysis identifying periodontal pathogens (IAI Pado Test 4.5®, Institute for Applied Immunology, Zuchwil, Switzerland). Presence or absence of bleeding on probing at these sites was also noted using a standardized probing force of 0.25 N (Audio Probe®, ESRO, Thalwil ZH, Switzerland). The percentage number of recall visits with positive bacteriological test results and positive BOP scores were calculated. Disease progression at the sites was defined if the annual increase in probing depth was ≥0.5 mm/year (2.5 mm in 5 years) or if the annual decrease in CADIA values (Computer Assisted Densitometric Image Analysis) was more than -0.7 per year (-3.5 in 5 years). Changes below these values were considered as negative test results indicating stability of the sites. The diagnostic characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of BOP and microbiological tests alone or in combination were then calculated using two-by-two tables. By application of increasing thresholds of BOP frequencies set for definition of positive test outcome (BOP ≥10% ≥20% ≥ 25% ≥ 50% ≥ 75% ≥ 90% or the combined BOP ≥75%, but DNA positive ≥ 10%, ≥ 25% ≥ 34% ≥ 50% ≥ 67% ≥ 90%) receiver operator characteristics curves (ROC) were constructed for teeth and implants. The areas under the ROC curves were calculated and compared by means of chi-square tests. The results indicated statistically significant better diagnostic characteristics of both tests at implants compared to teeth. The inclusion of an additional microbiological test significantly enhanced the diagnostic characteristics of BOP alone at teeth as well as at implants. © Munksgaard 2000.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154127
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.021
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.407
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuterbacher, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMayfield, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorBrägger, Uen_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:23:23Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:23:23Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2000, v. 11 n. 6, p. 521-529en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154127-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate a clinical and a microbiological test for monitoring tissue condition during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) and to compare their diagnostic characteristics at implant and tooth sites. Twelve female (age: 37-72 years) and 7 male patients (age: 26-83 years) were evaluated in this study on the basis of availability to follow a rigid SPT program. Patients had received a complete periodontal examination at 1 and 5 years after implant placement. This included standardized radiographs obtained at implants and matching control teeth. One implant site and one tooth site per patient were followed during the last 2 years of the SPT program. At each recall visit microbiological samples were analyzed according to DNA/RNA analysis identifying periodontal pathogens (IAI Pado Test 4.5®, Institute for Applied Immunology, Zuchwil, Switzerland). Presence or absence of bleeding on probing at these sites was also noted using a standardized probing force of 0.25 N (Audio Probe®, ESRO, Thalwil ZH, Switzerland). The percentage number of recall visits with positive bacteriological test results and positive BOP scores were calculated. Disease progression at the sites was defined if the annual increase in probing depth was ≥0.5 mm/year (2.5 mm in 5 years) or if the annual decrease in CADIA values (Computer Assisted Densitometric Image Analysis) was more than -0.7 per year (-3.5 in 5 years). Changes below these values were considered as negative test results indicating stability of the sites. The diagnostic characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of BOP and microbiological tests alone or in combination were then calculated using two-by-two tables. By application of increasing thresholds of BOP frequencies set for definition of positive test outcome (BOP ≥10% ≥20% ≥ 25% ≥ 50% ≥ 75% ≥ 90% or the combined BOP ≥75%, but DNA positive ≥ 10%, ≥ 25% ≥ 34% ≥ 50% ≥ 67% ≥ 90%) receiver operator characteristics curves (ROC) were constructed for teeth and implants. The areas under the ROC curves were calculated and compared by means of chi-square tests. The results indicated statistically significant better diagnostic characteristics of both tests at implants compared to teeth. The inclusion of an additional microbiological test significantly enhanced the diagnostic characteristics of BOP alone at teeth as well as at implants. © Munksgaard 2000.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.subjectBleeding on probing-
dc.subjectCADIA (computer assisted densitometric image analysis)-
dc.subjectDiagnosis-
dc.subjectDigital subtraction radiography-
dc.subjectMicrobiological tests-
dc.subjectPeri-implantitis-
dc.subjectPeriodontal disease-
dc.subject.meshActinobacillus Actinomycetemcomitans - Growth & Developmenten_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 And Overen_US
dc.subject.meshArea Under Curveen_US
dc.subject.meshBacteriological Techniquesen_US
dc.subject.meshChi-Square Distributionen_US
dc.subject.meshDna, Bacterial - Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implants - Microbiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshDisease Progressionen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshGingival Hemorrhage - Microbiology - Prevention & Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshImage Processing, Computer-Assisteden_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Pocket - Microbiology - Prevention & Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontitis - Microbiology - Prevention & Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontium - Microbiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshPorphyromonas Gingivalis - Growth & Developmenten_US
dc.subject.meshPredictive Value Of Testsen_US
dc.subject.meshPrevotella Intermedia - Growth & Developmenten_US
dc.subject.meshRna, Bacterial - Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshRoc Curveen_US
dc.subject.meshSensitivity And Specificityen_US
dc.subject.meshTreponema - Growth & Developmenten_US
dc.titleDiagnostic characteristics of clinical and microbiological tests for monitoring periodontal and peri-implant mucosal tissue conditions during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006521.x-
dc.identifier.pmid11168245-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0034572312en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034572312&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.spage521en_US
dc.identifier.epage529en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000165317700002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLuterbacher, S=36957661100en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMayfield, L=7004160753en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBrägger, U=7005538598en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0905-7161-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats