File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results.

TitleClinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results.
Authors
Issue Date1999
PublisherQuintessence Publishing Co Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.quintessencepublishing.co.uk/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3&products_id=241
Citation
The Chinese Journal Of Dental Research : The Official Journal Of The Scientific Section Of The Chinese Stomatological Association (Csa), 1999, v. 2 n. 3-4, p. 73-78 How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new glass ionomer restorative, ChemFlex, and to compare its clinical performance and wear to another popular material, Fuji IX GP, when used with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach in posterior teeth in school children. METHODS: Ninety-two subjects aged between 6 and 14 years who had bilateral matched pairs of carious posterior teeth were selected. A split-mouth experimental design was used in which the two restorative materials were randomly placed on contralateral sides. The restorations were assessed directly and also indirectly from color transparencies and die replicas. RESULTS: After one year, the success rates of ART restorations in the primary teeth were 96.6% for ChemFlex restorations and 89.7% for Fuji IX GP restorations placed in the Class I cavity preparations, whereas only 46.2% (ChemFlex) and 61.5% (Fuji IX GP) of Class II restorations were assessed as clinically satisfactory. In the permanent dentition, the success rates were 94.6% and 98.2% for ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP, respectively; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two restoratives for either the permanent or primary teeth. The mean occlusal wear after one year in the permanent teeth was 53.2 microns for ChemFlex and 56.3 microns for Fuji IX GP. Again, there were no statistically significant differences in wear between the two materials (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical performance of both ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP over a 12-month period was highly satisfactory and completely adequate for the ART technique, particularly in Class I cavities.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154078
ISSN
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.272

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Yen_US
dc.contributor.authorWei, SHen_US
dc.contributor.authorFan, MWen_US
dc.contributor.authorLo, ECen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:23:09Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:23:09Z-
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Chinese Journal Of Dental Research : The Official Journal Of The Scientific Section Of The Chinese Stomatological Association (Csa), 1999, v. 2 n. 3-4, p. 73-78en_US
dc.identifier.issn1462-6446en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154078-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new glass ionomer restorative, ChemFlex, and to compare its clinical performance and wear to another popular material, Fuji IX GP, when used with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach in posterior teeth in school children. METHODS: Ninety-two subjects aged between 6 and 14 years who had bilateral matched pairs of carious posterior teeth were selected. A split-mouth experimental design was used in which the two restorative materials were randomly placed on contralateral sides. The restorations were assessed directly and also indirectly from color transparencies and die replicas. RESULTS: After one year, the success rates of ART restorations in the primary teeth were 96.6% for ChemFlex restorations and 89.7% for Fuji IX GP restorations placed in the Class I cavity preparations, whereas only 46.2% (ChemFlex) and 61.5% (Fuji IX GP) of Class II restorations were assessed as clinically satisfactory. In the permanent dentition, the success rates were 94.6% and 98.2% for ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP, respectively; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two restoratives for either the permanent or primary teeth. The mean occlusal wear after one year in the permanent teeth was 53.2 microns for ChemFlex and 56.3 microns for Fuji IX GP. Again, there were no statistically significant differences in wear between the two materials (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical performance of both ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP over a 12-month period was highly satisfactory and completely adequate for the ART technique, particularly in Class I cavities.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.quintessencepublishing.co.uk/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=3&products_id=241en_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)en_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshBicuspiden_US
dc.subject.meshChi-Square Distributionen_US
dc.subject.meshChilden_US
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration Wearen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration, Permanent - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshGlass Ionomer Cementsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMolaren_US
dc.subject.meshSafetyen_US
dc.titleClinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLo, EC:hrdplcm@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLo, EC=rp00015en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid10863422-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0033290396en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros49416-
dc.identifier.volume2en_US
dc.identifier.issue3-4en_US
dc.identifier.spage73en_US
dc.identifier.epage78en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLuo, Y=49161174100en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWei, SH=7401765260en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFan, MW=7201970773en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLo, EC=7101705982en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats