File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique: 5-year results of a prospective study with 12 implants

TitleLong-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique: 5-year results of a prospective study with 12 implants
Authors
Issue Date1996
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1996, v. 7 n. 4, p. 175-183 How to Cite?
AbstractThe purpose of the present clinical study was to evaluate the 5-year results of the first 12 implants inserted at the University of Berne in regenerated bone following successful ridge augmentation with the membrane technique. The patients were recalled and examined with clinical and radiographic parameters routinely utilized in prospective studies with standard implants in non-regenerated bone. Based on clinical and radiographic findings, all 12 implants were considered successfully integrated according to strict criteria of success. The detailed analysis of clinical parameters revealed no differences to results of prospective studies on standard implants in non-regenerated bone. All implants demonstrated ankylotic stability which was confirmed by a mean Periotest value of-2.08. The radiographic analysis showed stable bone crest levels with a mean bone loss between the 1- and 5-year examination of 0.30 mm. However, 2 implants exhibited a bone loss of more than 1 mm between the 1- and 5-year examination. Therefore, the prognosis of these 2 implants seems questionable at the present time. It can be concluded that bone regenerated with the membrane technique reacts to implant placement like non-regenerated bone, since all 12 implants achieved successful tissue integration with functional ankylosis. Furthermore, this bone is also load-bearing, since all 12 implants maintained osseointegration over a 5-year period. Copyright © Munksgaard 1996.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153973
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.464
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.427
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuser, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorDula, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.contributor.authorNyman, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:22:35Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:22:35Z-
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 1996, v. 7 n. 4, p. 175-183en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153973-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present clinical study was to evaluate the 5-year results of the first 12 implants inserted at the University of Berne in regenerated bone following successful ridge augmentation with the membrane technique. The patients were recalled and examined with clinical and radiographic parameters routinely utilized in prospective studies with standard implants in non-regenerated bone. Based on clinical and radiographic findings, all 12 implants were considered successfully integrated according to strict criteria of success. The detailed analysis of clinical parameters revealed no differences to results of prospective studies on standard implants in non-regenerated bone. All implants demonstrated ankylotic stability which was confirmed by a mean Periotest value of-2.08. The radiographic analysis showed stable bone crest levels with a mean bone loss between the 1- and 5-year examination of 0.30 mm. However, 2 implants exhibited a bone loss of more than 1 mm between the 1- and 5-year examination. Therefore, the prognosis of these 2 implants seems questionable at the present time. It can be concluded that bone regenerated with the membrane technique reacts to implant placement like non-regenerated bone, since all 12 implants achieved successful tissue integration with functional ankylosis. Furthermore, this bone is also load-bearing, since all 12 implants maintained osseointegration over a 5-year period. Copyright © Munksgaard 1996.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Ridge Augmentation - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Plaque Indexen_US
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshGuided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMembranes, Artificialen_US
dc.subject.meshOsseointegrationen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Indexen_US
dc.subject.meshPolytetrafluoroethyleneen_US
dc.subject.meshProspective Studiesen_US
dc.titleLong-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique: 5-year results of a prospective study with 12 implantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid9002837-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0030155754en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030155754&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.spage175en_US
dc.identifier.epage183en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1996UY55300013-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBuser, D=7006034952en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridDula, K=6603844232en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNyman, S=7005360213en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats