File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070212.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0030155754
- PMID: 9002837
- WOS: WOS:A1996UY55300013
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique: 5-year results of a prospective study with 12 implants
Title | Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique: 5-year results of a prospective study with 12 implants |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Barrier membranes Guided bone regeneration Membrane technique Osseointegrated implants Ridge augmentation |
Issue Date | 1996 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR |
Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1996, v. 7 n. 4, p. 175-183 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The purpose of the present clinical study was to evaluate the 5-year results of the first 12 implants inserted at the University of Berne in regenerated bone following successful ridge augmentation with the membrane technique. The patients were recalled and examined with clinical and radiographic parameters routinely utilized in prospective studies with standard implants in non-regenerated bone. Based on clinical and radiographic findings, all 12 implants were considered successfully integrated according to strict criteria of success. The detailed analysis of clinical parameters revealed no differences to results of prospective studies on standard implants in non-regenerated bone. All implants demonstrated ankylotic stability which was confirmed by a mean Periotest value of-2.08. The radiographic analysis showed stable bone crest levels with a mean bone loss between the 1- and 5-year examination of 0.30 mm. However, 2 implants exhibited a bone loss of more than 1 mm between the 1- and 5-year examination. Therefore, the prognosis of these 2 implants seems questionable at the present time. It can be concluded that bone regenerated with the membrane technique reacts to implant placement like non-regenerated bone, since all 12 implants achieved successful tissue integration with functional ankylosis. Furthermore, this bone is also load-bearing, since all 12 implants maintained osseointegration over a 5-year period. Copyright © Munksgaard 1996. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/153973 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Buser, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dula, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nyman, S | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:22:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:22:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1996, v. 7 n. 4, p. 175-183 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/153973 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of the present clinical study was to evaluate the 5-year results of the first 12 implants inserted at the University of Berne in regenerated bone following successful ridge augmentation with the membrane technique. The patients were recalled and examined with clinical and radiographic parameters routinely utilized in prospective studies with standard implants in non-regenerated bone. Based on clinical and radiographic findings, all 12 implants were considered successfully integrated according to strict criteria of success. The detailed analysis of clinical parameters revealed no differences to results of prospective studies on standard implants in non-regenerated bone. All implants demonstrated ankylotic stability which was confirmed by a mean Periotest value of-2.08. The radiographic analysis showed stable bone crest levels with a mean bone loss between the 1- and 5-year examination of 0.30 mm. However, 2 implants exhibited a bone loss of more than 1 mm between the 1- and 5-year examination. Therefore, the prognosis of these 2 implants seems questionable at the present time. It can be concluded that bone regenerated with the membrane technique reacts to implant placement like non-regenerated bone, since all 12 implants achieved successful tissue integration with functional ankylosis. Furthermore, this bone is also load-bearing, since all 12 implants maintained osseointegration over a 5-year period. Copyright © Munksgaard 1996. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_US |
dc.subject | Barrier membranes | - |
dc.subject | Guided bone regeneration | - |
dc.subject | Membrane technique | - |
dc.subject | Osseointegrated implants | - |
dc.subject | Ridge augmentation | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Alveolar Bone Loss - Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implantation, Endosseous - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Plaque Index | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Follow-Up Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Membranes, Artificial | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Osseointegration | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Periodontal Index | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Polytetrafluoroethylene | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | en_US |
dc.title | Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique: 5-year results of a prospective study with 12 implants | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070212.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 9002837 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0030155754 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030155754&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 175 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 183 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:A1996UY55300013 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Buser, D=7006034952 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Dula, K=6603844232 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Nyman, S=7005360213 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0905-7161 | - |