File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Maintenance of new attachment 1 and 4 years following guided tissue regeneration (GTR).

TitleMaintenance of new attachment 1 and 4 years following guided tissue regeneration (GTR).
Authors
Keywordsguided tissue regeneration (GTR)
periodontal disease
periodontits
regenerative therapy
supportive periodontal therapy
Issue Date1995
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPE
Citation
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, 1995, v. 22 n. 9, p. 661-669 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of the present study was to evaluate periodontal tissue alterations during the maintenance phase following GTR therapy. 18 patients (average age 54 years, range 39-79 years) with 19 local periodontal defects were monitored longitudinally using clinical periodontal parameters and radiographic assessments of bone level changes. 6 out of originally 24 patients were not available at the 4-year examination (2 patients were unwilling to participate and in 4 patients root amputations or tooth extractions had to be performed). Evaluations were performed at baseline, 3 months, 1 year and 4 years following GTR therapy (using non-resorbable Gore-Tex Periodontal Material). The changes observed at the deepest site of each tooth treated by GTR were compared to those encountered in the entire dentition. Supportive periodontal therapy was performed according to the patient's individual needs between 3 and 12 times between the 1 and 4 years examination. The plaque index and the gingival index at the 4 years examination were assessed and had increased to almost double the value of baseline, although the BOP remained lower compared to baseline data. Between the 1 and 4 years examinations, 1.27 mm of clinical attachment was lost as a mean. Regarding the site of each tooth treated with GTR with the initially deepest probing pocket depth, 1.42 mm of clinical attachment was lost during the maintenance phase. However, compared to baseline data, 1.37 mm of new attachment could be maintained. The clinical attachment level was maintained within +/- 1 mm in 12 out of 19 sites during the 4 years of maintenance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153938
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 7.478
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.456
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeigel, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrägger, Uen_US
dc.contributor.authorHämmerle, CHen_US
dc.contributor.authorMombelli, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:22:24Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:22:24Z-
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Clinical Periodontology, 1995, v. 22 n. 9, p. 661-669en_US
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153938-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to evaluate periodontal tissue alterations during the maintenance phase following GTR therapy. 18 patients (average age 54 years, range 39-79 years) with 19 local periodontal defects were monitored longitudinally using clinical periodontal parameters and radiographic assessments of bone level changes. 6 out of originally 24 patients were not available at the 4-year examination (2 patients were unwilling to participate and in 4 patients root amputations or tooth extractions had to be performed). Evaluations were performed at baseline, 3 months, 1 year and 4 years following GTR therapy (using non-resorbable Gore-Tex Periodontal Material). The changes observed at the deepest site of each tooth treated by GTR were compared to those encountered in the entire dentition. Supportive periodontal therapy was performed according to the patient's individual needs between 3 and 12 times between the 1 and 4 years examination. The plaque index and the gingival index at the 4 years examination were assessed and had increased to almost double the value of baseline, although the BOP remained lower compared to baseline data. Between the 1 and 4 years examinations, 1.27 mm of clinical attachment was lost as a mean. Regarding the site of each tooth treated with GTR with the initially deepest probing pocket depth, 1.42 mm of clinical attachment was lost during the maintenance phase. However, compared to baseline data, 1.37 mm of new attachment could be maintained. The clinical attachment level was maintained within +/- 1 mm in 12 out of 19 sites during the 4 years of maintenance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontologyen_US
dc.subjectguided tissue regeneration (GTR)-
dc.subjectperiodontal disease-
dc.subjectperiodontits-
dc.subjectregenerative therapy-
dc.subjectsupportive periodontal therapy-
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAge Factorsen_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss - Radiography - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshApicoectomyen_US
dc.subject.meshAppointments And Schedulesen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Plaque Indexen_US
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshGingival Hemorrhage - Pathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshGingivitis - Pathology - Prevention & Control - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshGuided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontalen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshLongitudinal Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshMembranes, Artificialen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Attachment Loss - Pathology - Prevention & Control - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Indexen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Pocket - Pathology - Prevention & Control - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontium - Pathology - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshPolytetrafluoroethyleneen_US
dc.subject.meshRegression Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshTooth Extractionen_US
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.titleMaintenance of new attachment 1 and 4 years following guided tissue regeneration (GTR).en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00823.x-
dc.identifier.pmid7593694-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0029371812en_US
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.spage661en_US
dc.identifier.epage669en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1995RQ39100001-
dc.publisher.placeDenmarken_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWeigel, C=7005466378en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBrägger, U=7005538598en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHämmerle, CH=7005331848en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMombelli, A=7006180872en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0303-6979-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats