File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bleeding on probing. A parameter for monitoring periodontal conditions in clinical practice.

TitleBleeding on probing. A parameter for monitoring periodontal conditions in clinical practice.
Authors
Keywordsbleeding on probing
diagnosis
loss of probing attachment
periodontal health
supportive therapy
Issue Date1994
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPE
Citation
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, 1994, v. 21 n. 6, p. 402-408 How to Cite?
AbstractThe present study is a follow-up report on the use of bleeding on probing (BOP) as a clinical indicator for disease progression or periodontal stability, respectively. Following active periodontal therapy, 39 patients were incorporated in a program of supportive periodontal therapy for a period of 53 months with recall intervals varying between 2-8 months. The patients received supportive therapy 7 to 14 x. At the beginning of each maintenance visit, the tissues were evaluated using BOP. Reinstrumentation was only performed at sites which bled on probing. However, supragingival plaque and calculus were always removed. Probing depth and probing attachment levels were determined after active treatment and at the conclusion of the study. Progression of periodontal disease was defined by a measured loss of probing attachment of 2 mm or more. During the observation period, 4.2% of all the sites lost attachment. Approximately 50% of these losses were due to periodontal disease progression, while the other half was the result of attachment loss in conjunction with recession of the gingiva. 2/3 of all the sites which lost attachment were found in a group of patients which presented a mean BOP > or = 30%. In a group of patients with a mean BOP of < or = 20%, only 1/5 of the loser sites were found. This clearly indicated, that patients with a mean BOP of < or = 20% have a significantly lower risk for further loss of probing attachment at single sites.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153882
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 7.478
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.456
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJoss, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdler, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:22:05Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:22:05Z-
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Clinical Periodontology, 1994, v. 21 n. 6, p. 402-408en_US
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153882-
dc.description.abstractThe present study is a follow-up report on the use of bleeding on probing (BOP) as a clinical indicator for disease progression or periodontal stability, respectively. Following active periodontal therapy, 39 patients were incorporated in a program of supportive periodontal therapy for a period of 53 months with recall intervals varying between 2-8 months. The patients received supportive therapy 7 to 14 x. At the beginning of each maintenance visit, the tissues were evaluated using BOP. Reinstrumentation was only performed at sites which bled on probing. However, supragingival plaque and calculus were always removed. Probing depth and probing attachment levels were determined after active treatment and at the conclusion of the study. Progression of periodontal disease was defined by a measured loss of probing attachment of 2 mm or more. During the observation period, 4.2% of all the sites lost attachment. Approximately 50% of these losses were due to periodontal disease progression, while the other half was the result of attachment loss in conjunction with recession of the gingiva. 2/3 of all the sites which lost attachment were found in a group of patients which presented a mean BOP > or = 30%. In a group of patients with a mean BOP of < or = 20%, only 1/5 of the loser sites were found. This clearly indicated, that patients with a mean BOP of < or = 20% have a significantly lower risk for further loss of probing attachment at single sites.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontologyen_US
dc.subjectbleeding on probing-
dc.subjectdiagnosis-
dc.subjectloss of probing attachment-
dc.subjectperiodontal health-
dc.subjectsupportive therapy-
dc.subject.meshDental Prophylaxisen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshGingival Hemorrhage - Diagnosis - Physiopathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshGingival Recession - Physiopathology - Prevention & Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Attachment Loss - Physiopathology - Prevention & Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Indexen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontitis - Diagnosis - Physiopathology - Prevention & Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshPredictive Value Of Testsen_US
dc.subject.meshPrognosisen_US
dc.subject.meshRecurrenceen_US
dc.subject.meshRegression Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshReproducibility Of Resultsen_US
dc.titleBleeding on probing. A parameter for monitoring periodontal conditions in clinical practice.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00737.x-
dc.identifier.pmid8089242en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0028470305en_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.spage402en_US
dc.identifier.epage408en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1994NT33800006-
dc.publisher.placeDenmarken_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridJoss, A=7005904584en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridAdler, R=7202640426en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0303-6979-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats