File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A comparison of alveolar bone grafting with and without simultaneous maxillary osteotomies in cleft palate patients

TitleA comparison of alveolar bone grafting with and without simultaneous maxillary osteotomies in cleft palate patients
Authors
Issue Date1994
PublisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijom
Citation
International Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 1994, v. 23 n. 2, p. 65-70 How to Cite?
AbstractNineteen unilateral and 19 bilateral alveolar clefts (group A) were grafted with cancellous iliac bone by a standard method, and 21 unilateral and 15 bilateral clefts (group B) underwent simultaneous maxillary osteotomies and alveolar bone grafting with cancellous iliac bone. The two groups were retrospectively evaluated clinically and radiographically for alveolar bone level (ABL), attached keratinized gingiva (AKG), sulcus depth (SD), and persistence of oronasal fistulae (ONF). The follow-up ranged from 6 to 54 months with a mean of 23 months for group A and 26 months for group B. In group A, AKG ranged from 1 to 10 mm (mean 5 mm), most patients having deep or normal SD and type I ABL as measured according to the Oslo method. No persistent ONF was noted. In group B, AKG ranged from 0 to 8 mm (mean 3 mm), half the patients showing a shallow sulcus, most with type II or III ABL. In this group, a 4% failure rate of the bone grafting was noted and 6% fistula persistence. It is concluded that the overall results of standard alveolar bone grafting are better in this series than those of simultaneous osteotomy cases, results which are still quite acceptable because they are comparable with published results of standard alveolar bone grafting. The results of this study indicate that simultaneous osteotomy with alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients does not compromise the outcome of bone grafting; therefore, they support the one-stage surgical management of patients with ungrafted clefts and maxillary hypoplasia.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153875
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.563
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.854
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSamman, Nen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:22:02Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:22:02Z-
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 1994, v. 23 n. 2, p. 65-70en_US
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153875-
dc.description.abstractNineteen unilateral and 19 bilateral alveolar clefts (group A) were grafted with cancellous iliac bone by a standard method, and 21 unilateral and 15 bilateral clefts (group B) underwent simultaneous maxillary osteotomies and alveolar bone grafting with cancellous iliac bone. The two groups were retrospectively evaluated clinically and radiographically for alveolar bone level (ABL), attached keratinized gingiva (AKG), sulcus depth (SD), and persistence of oronasal fistulae (ONF). The follow-up ranged from 6 to 54 months with a mean of 23 months for group A and 26 months for group B. In group A, AKG ranged from 1 to 10 mm (mean 5 mm), most patients having deep or normal SD and type I ABL as measured according to the Oslo method. No persistent ONF was noted. In group B, AKG ranged from 0 to 8 mm (mean 3 mm), half the patients showing a shallow sulcus, most with type II or III ABL. In this group, a 4% failure rate of the bone grafting was noted and 6% fistula persistence. It is concluded that the overall results of standard alveolar bone grafting are better in this series than those of simultaneous osteotomy cases, results which are still quite acceptable because they are comparable with published results of standard alveolar bone grafting. The results of this study indicate that simultaneous osteotomy with alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients does not compromise the outcome of bone grafting; therefore, they support the one-stage surgical management of patients with ungrafted clefts and maxillary hypoplasia.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijomen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Process - Abnormalities - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.meshChilden_US
dc.subject.meshCleft Palate - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshClinical Protocolsen_US
dc.subject.meshCuspid - Growth & Developmenten_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaxilla - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshOsteotomy - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshOutcome And Process Assessment (Health Care)en_US
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshTooth Eruptionen_US
dc.titleA comparison of alveolar bone grafting with and without simultaneous maxillary osteotomies in cleft palate patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailSamman, N:nsamman@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authoritySamman, N=rp00021en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid8035052en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0028411742en_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.spage65en_US
dc.identifier.epage70en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1994NL83000001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSamman, N=7006413627en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats