File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A comparison of oral rinse and imprint sampling techniques for the detection of yeast, coliform and Staphylococcus aureus carriage in the oral cavity.

TitleA comparison of oral rinse and imprint sampling techniques for the detection of yeast, coliform and Staphylococcus aureus carriage in the oral cavity.
Authors
Issue Date1986
Citation
Journal Of Oral Pathology, 1986, v. 15 n. 7, p. 386-388 How to Cite?
AbstractThe sensitivity of the impression culture, the neat rinse culture (NRC) and the concentrated rinse culture (CRC) methods in detecting the oral carriage of yeasts, coliforms and Staphylococcus aureus was estimated in 75 individuals. The recovery of organisms from the imprint cultures of the tongue and the CRC was similar and there was highly significant positive correlation between the two techniques. The CRC was simple to perform, equally sensitive and superior in quantifying yeast, coliform and S. aureus carriage than the imprint culture technique. Hence, it is suggested that the CRC technique be preferentially employed in future investigations to obtain comparable data from different centres.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153595
ISSN
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSamaranayake, LPen_US
dc.contributor.authorMacfarlane, TWen_US
dc.contributor.authorLamey, PJen_US
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, MMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:20:33Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:20:33Z-
dc.date.issued1986en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Oral Pathology, 1986, v. 15 n. 7, p. 386-388en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-9777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153595-
dc.description.abstractThe sensitivity of the impression culture, the neat rinse culture (NRC) and the concentrated rinse culture (CRC) methods in detecting the oral carriage of yeasts, coliforms and Staphylococcus aureus was estimated in 75 individuals. The recovery of organisms from the imprint cultures of the tongue and the CRC was similar and there was highly significant positive correlation between the two techniques. The CRC was simple to perform, equally sensitive and superior in quantifying yeast, coliform and S. aureus carriage than the imprint culture technique. Hence, it is suggested that the CRC technique be preferentially employed in future investigations to obtain comparable data from different centres.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of oral pathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshBacteriological Techniquesen_US
dc.subject.meshCandida - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.subject.meshEnterobacteriaceae - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMouth - Microbiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshSpecimen Handling - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshStaphylococcus Aureus - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.subject.meshYeasts - Isolation & Purificationen_US
dc.titleA comparison of oral rinse and imprint sampling techniques for the detection of yeast, coliform and Staphylococcus aureus carriage in the oral cavity.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailSamaranayake, LP:lakshman@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authoritySamaranayake, LP=rp00023en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid3098945-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0022767326en_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.spage386en_US
dc.identifier.epage388en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1986E927900004-
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSamaranayake, LP=7102761002en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMacFarlane, TW=7005128465en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLamey, PJ=7102581858en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFerguson, MM=7402593127en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats