File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01703.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84865746511
- PMID: 22924360
- WOS: WOS:000307939000015
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effect of storage media and time on the fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements
Title | Effect of storage media and time on the fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Acidic storage media Fracture toughness Resin cements |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421 |
Citation | Australian Dental Journal, 2012, v. 57 n. 3, p. 349-354 How to Cite? |
Abstract | BACKGROUND: Resin-based cements are brittle materials and the major shortcomings of these materials are manifested in their sensitivity to flaws and defects. Although various mechanical properties of resin luting cements have been described, few fracture toughness test data for resin-based luting cements using the short rod design have been published. METHODS: Specimens were prepared from five resin luting cements. For each material a total of 36 disc-shaped specimens were prepared using a custom-made mould. Specimens were randomly divided into six groups of six, immersed in two solutions: distilled water and 0.01 mol/L lactic acid at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, 1 month or 3 months. The specimens were loaded using a universal testing machine. The maximum load at specimen failure was recorded and the K(Ic) (MPa. M 0.5) was calculated. RESULTS: There was a relationship between material, storage solution and time (p < 0.05). Nexus 3 showed the highest K(Ic) followed by Panavia F, Calibra, Smart Cem2 and seT. CONCLUSIONS: The fracture toughness of the resin luting cements was affected by both time and storage solution. Comparable fracture toughness of conventional resin cement and self-adhesive resin cements was observed. © 2012 Australian Dental Association. |
Description | Scientific article |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/152612 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.597 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Azar, MR | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bagheri, R | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Burrow, MF | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-07-16T09:43:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-16T09:43:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Australian Dental Journal, 2012, v. 57 n. 3, p. 349-354 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0045-0421 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/152612 | - |
dc.description | Scientific article | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Resin-based cements are brittle materials and the major shortcomings of these materials are manifested in their sensitivity to flaws and defects. Although various mechanical properties of resin luting cements have been described, few fracture toughness test data for resin-based luting cements using the short rod design have been published. METHODS: Specimens were prepared from five resin luting cements. For each material a total of 36 disc-shaped specimens were prepared using a custom-made mould. Specimens were randomly divided into six groups of six, immersed in two solutions: distilled water and 0.01 mol/L lactic acid at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, 1 month or 3 months. The specimens were loaded using a universal testing machine. The maximum load at specimen failure was recorded and the K(Ic) (MPa. M 0.5) was calculated. RESULTS: There was a relationship between material, storage solution and time (p < 0.05). Nexus 3 showed the highest K(Ic) followed by Panavia F, Calibra, Smart Cem2 and seT. CONCLUSIONS: The fracture toughness of the resin luting cements was affected by both time and storage solution. Comparable fracture toughness of conventional resin cement and self-adhesive resin cements was observed. © 2012 Australian Dental Association. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421 | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Australian Dental Journal | en_US |
dc.rights | The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com | - |
dc.subject | Acidic storage media | - |
dc.subject | Fracture toughness | - |
dc.subject | Resin cements | - |
dc.title | Effect of storage media and time on the fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Bagheri, R: bagherir@unimelb.edu.au | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Burrow, MF: mfburr58@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Burrow, MF=rp01306 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01703.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22924360 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84865746511 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 201800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 57 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 349 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 354 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000307939000015 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0045-0421 | - |