File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0029388135
- WOS: WOS:A1995RZ82500008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Nearest-neighbor algorithms for load-balancing in parallel computers
Title | Nearest-neighbor algorithms for load-balancing in parallel computers |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 1995 |
Citation | Concurrency Practice And Experience, 1995, v. 7 n. 7, p. 707-736 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Two nearest-neighbor algorithms, the dimension-exchange and the diffusion methods and their variants - optimally tuned dimension-exchange (ODE) and optimally tuned diffusion (ODF) are compared. The comparison is made with respect to both one-port and all-port communication architectures and in considerations of various implementation strategies including synchronous/asynchronous invocation policies and static/dynamic random workload behaviors. Result show that the dimension exchange method outperforms the diffusion method in one-port communication model. In particular, the ODE algorithm is best suited for statically synchronous implementations of a load-balancing process regardless of its underlying communication models. The strength of the diffusion method is in asynchronous implementations in the all-port communication model; the ODF is algorithm performs best in that case. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/152253 |
ISSN | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Xu, Chengzhong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Monien, Burkhard | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Luling, Reinhard | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, Francis CM | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-26T06:36:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-26T06:36:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1995 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Concurrency Practice And Experience, 1995, v. 7 n. 7, p. 707-736 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1040-3108 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/152253 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Two nearest-neighbor algorithms, the dimension-exchange and the diffusion methods and their variants - optimally tuned dimension-exchange (ODE) and optimally tuned diffusion (ODF) are compared. The comparison is made with respect to both one-port and all-port communication architectures and in considerations of various implementation strategies including synchronous/asynchronous invocation policies and static/dynamic random workload behaviors. Result show that the dimension exchange method outperforms the diffusion method in one-port communication model. In particular, the ODE algorithm is best suited for statically synchronous implementations of a load-balancing process regardless of its underlying communication models. The strength of the diffusion method is in asynchronous implementations in the all-port communication model; the ODF is algorithm performs best in that case. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Concurrency Practice and Experience | en_US |
dc.rights | Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience. Copyright © John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | - |
dc.title | Nearest-neighbor algorithms for load-balancing in parallel computers | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lau, Francis CM:fcmlau@cs.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lau, Francis CM=rp00221 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0029388135 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 8374 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 707 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 736 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:A1995RZ82500008 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Xu, Chengzhong=8701888000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Monien, Burkhard=7004261863 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Luling, Reinhard=6507296482 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, Francis CM=7102749723 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1040-3108 | - |