File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Reuse of an aerobically treated wastewater effluent for the removal of SO 2 in the flue gas
Title | Reuse of an aerobically treated wastewater effluent for the removal of SO 2 in the flue gas |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Absorption Desulfurization Flue Gas Reuse So 2 Wastewater |
Issue Date | 2003 |
Publisher | IWA Publishing. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.iwapublishing.com/template.cfm?name=iwapwst_ws |
Citation | Water Science And Technology: Water Supply, 2003, v. 3 n. 3, p. 101-107 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Aerobically treated wastewater effluent (ATWE), intrinsically having high alkalinity, was used to remove sulfur dioxide (SO 2) in the flue gas of a coal power plant. Experimental results conducted in a four sieve-tray tower showed that ATWE absorbed SO 2 in flue gas effectively. At a gas: liquid (G:L) ratio of 110:1, the respective SO 2 removal efficiencies were 99% and 95% for flue gases containing 1,600 and 5,000 Mg/kL of SO 2. When the G:L ratio increased to 220:1, the removal efficiency was slightly lowered to 93% for the flue gas containing 1,600 Mg/kL of SO 2. ATWE had higher buffer capacity and SO 2 removal efficiencies as compared to seawater, a common SO 2 scrubbing medium serving as control. In addition, the equilibrium equation between SO 2 partial pressure and concentration of bisulfite (HSO 3 -) in ATWE and the kinetic equation describing the rate of SO 2 absorption in the sieve-tray tower by ATWE were established. The absorbing coefficients in the kinetic equation were determined to be 1.96 ± 0.37 mol/(m 2·s·bar) for gas phase and 0.00184 ± 0.00049 m/s for liquid film. The enhancement factor of the absorbing coefficient in liquid film was 14.28 ± 1.79, resulting in 93% of the decrease of liquid film resistance. The SO 2 absorption rate in the sieve-tray tower was mainly affected by the gas film resistance, representing 96% of the total resistance. Experimental results of this study confirmed that the removal of SO 2 from the flue gas of coal power plants by ATWE was cost-effective. This process does not require the addition of any chemicals and produces no secondary pollution. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/152122 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.452 |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Y | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ma, LM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fang, HHP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gao, TY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Xu, ZX | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, YC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jing, ZG | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-26T06:35:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-26T06:35:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Water Science And Technology: Water Supply, 2003, v. 3 n. 3, p. 101-107 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1606-9749 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/152122 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aerobically treated wastewater effluent (ATWE), intrinsically having high alkalinity, was used to remove sulfur dioxide (SO 2) in the flue gas of a coal power plant. Experimental results conducted in a four sieve-tray tower showed that ATWE absorbed SO 2 in flue gas effectively. At a gas: liquid (G:L) ratio of 110:1, the respective SO 2 removal efficiencies were 99% and 95% for flue gases containing 1,600 and 5,000 Mg/kL of SO 2. When the G:L ratio increased to 220:1, the removal efficiency was slightly lowered to 93% for the flue gas containing 1,600 Mg/kL of SO 2. ATWE had higher buffer capacity and SO 2 removal efficiencies as compared to seawater, a common SO 2 scrubbing medium serving as control. In addition, the equilibrium equation between SO 2 partial pressure and concentration of bisulfite (HSO 3 -) in ATWE and the kinetic equation describing the rate of SO 2 absorption in the sieve-tray tower by ATWE were established. The absorbing coefficients in the kinetic equation were determined to be 1.96 ± 0.37 mol/(m 2·s·bar) for gas phase and 0.00184 ± 0.00049 m/s for liquid film. The enhancement factor of the absorbing coefficient in liquid film was 14.28 ± 1.79, resulting in 93% of the decrease of liquid film resistance. The SO 2 absorption rate in the sieve-tray tower was mainly affected by the gas film resistance, representing 96% of the total resistance. Experimental results of this study confirmed that the removal of SO 2 from the flue gas of coal power plants by ATWE was cost-effective. This process does not require the addition of any chemicals and produces no secondary pollution. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | IWA Publishing. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.iwapublishing.com/template.cfm?name=iwapwst_ws | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Water Science and Technology: Water Supply | en_US |
dc.subject | Absorption | en_US |
dc.subject | Desulfurization | en_US |
dc.subject | Flue Gas | en_US |
dc.subject | Reuse | en_US |
dc.subject | So 2 | en_US |
dc.subject | Wastewater | en_US |
dc.title | Reuse of an aerobically treated wastewater effluent for the removal of SO 2 in the flue gas | en_US |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Fang, HHP:hrechef@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Fang, HHP=rp00115 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0038601690 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0038601690&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 101 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 107 | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Liu, Y=36013132500 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ma, LM=7403574622 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fang, HHP=7402542625 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Gao, TY=14058043400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Xu, ZX=23967496700 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wang, YC=12345218300 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Jing, ZG=55177595100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1606-9749 | - |