File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.suscom.2011.05.002
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-80052588140
- WOS: WOS:000209575400004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Tradeoff between energy and throughput for online deadline scheduling
Title | Tradeoff between energy and throughput for online deadline scheduling |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Bounded-speed Competitive algorithms Competitive analysis Competitive ratio Deadline scheduling |
Issue Date | 2011 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/724189/description#description |
Citation | Sustainable Computing: informatics and systems, 2011, v. 1 n. 3, p. 189-195 How to Cite? |
Abstract | We consider dynamic speed scaling on a single processor and study the tradeoff between throughput and energy for deadline scheduling. Specifically, we assume each job is associated with a user-defined value (or importance) and a deadline. We allow a scheduling algorithm to discard some of the jobs (i.e., not finishing them by their deadlines), and the objective is to minimize the total energy usage plus the total value of jobs discarded. We give new online algorithms under both the unbounded-speed and bounded-speed models. When the maximum speed is unbounded, we give an O(1)-competitive algorithm. This algorithm relies on a key notion called the profitable speed, which is the maximum speed beyond which processing a job costs more energy than the value of the job. When the processor has a bounded maximum speed T, we show that no O(1)-competitive algorithm can exist and more precisely, the competitive ratio grows with the penalty ratio of the input, which is defined as the ratio between the maximum profitable speed of a job to the maximum speed T. On the positive side, we give an algorithm with a competitive ratio whose dependency on the penalty ratio almost matches the lower bound. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/152007 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.014 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, HL | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, TW | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Li, R | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-26T06:32:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-26T06:32:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Sustainable Computing: informatics and systems, 2011, v. 1 n. 3, p. 189-195 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2210-5379 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/152007 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We consider dynamic speed scaling on a single processor and study the tradeoff between throughput and energy for deadline scheduling. Specifically, we assume each job is associated with a user-defined value (or importance) and a deadline. We allow a scheduling algorithm to discard some of the jobs (i.e., not finishing them by their deadlines), and the objective is to minimize the total energy usage plus the total value of jobs discarded. We give new online algorithms under both the unbounded-speed and bounded-speed models. When the maximum speed is unbounded, we give an O(1)-competitive algorithm. This algorithm relies on a key notion called the profitable speed, which is the maximum speed beyond which processing a job costs more energy than the value of the job. When the processor has a bounded maximum speed T, we show that no O(1)-competitive algorithm can exist and more precisely, the competitive ratio grows with the penalty ratio of the input, which is defined as the ratio between the maximum profitable speed of a job to the maximum speed T. On the positive side, we give an algorithm with a competitive ratio whose dependency on the penalty ratio almost matches the lower bound. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/724189/description#description | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Sustainable Computing: informatics and systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Bounded-speed | en_US |
dc.subject | Competitive algorithms | en_US |
dc.subject | Competitive analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Competitive ratio | en_US |
dc.subject | Deadline scheduling | en_US |
dc.title | Tradeoff between energy and throughput for online deadline scheduling | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, HL: hlchan@cs.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, TW: hresltk@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Li, R: rbli@cs.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chan, HL=rp01310 | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, TW=rp00135 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.suscom.2011.05.002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-80052588140 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 212274 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-80052588140&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 189 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 195 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000209575400004 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Li, R=36918615800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, TW=7202523165 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, HL=7403402384 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2210-5379 | - |