File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Exact and approximate link scheduling algorithms under the physical interference model

TitleExact and approximate link scheduling algorithms under the physical interference model
Authors
KeywordsAd Hoc Networks
Coloring
Constraint Satisfaction Problem
Counting
Inclusion-Exclusion Principle
Link Scheduling
Physical Interference Model
Sensor Networks
Sinr
Wireless
Issue Date2008
Citation
Dialm-Pomc'08: Proceedings Of The Acm 5Th International Workshop On Foundations Of Mobile Computing, 2008, p. 45-54 How to Cite?
AbstractGiven n arbitrarily distributed single-hop wireless links, using the physical interference model, the objective is to minimize the scheduling length. This is an open problem (Problem 1) proposed by Locher et al. [21]. In this paper, we solve this open problem at the cost of moderately exponential time. Specifically, this paper gives two classes of exact and approximate link scheduling algorithms, one based on the somewhat straightforward link independent set covering, and the other on counting the number of set covers. Letp(n) denote the time of checking whether the spectral radius of an irreducible non-negative matrix is smaller than 1 or not, then the time complexity for the set covering based exact algorithm isO(2 n/ 2)), whereas the proposed counting based exact scheduling algorithm called ESA-MLSAT needs only time O(3n • n ■ log 2 n ■ p(n)) with polynomial space. If exponential space is allowed, the time complexity can be further reduced to O(2n ■ n ■ log 2 n ■ p(n)). The time complexity for the set covering based approximate algorithm is O(( n n/2)-logn ■ p(n)) with approximation ratio O(logn) . The time complexity of the first counting based approximation algorithm is O(n 2polylog(n)) with approximation ratio O(nlog n), the time complexity of the second counting based approximation algorithm is O(n 1+og3' og n polylog(n)) with approximation ratio O(njlog n), and the time complexity of the third counting based approximate algorithm is O((( n n/2) + 3 e n•n• logn)-logn-p(n)) with approximation ratio |(1 + s)|. All these approximation algorithms use polynomial space. © 2008 ACM.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/151946
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHua, QSen_US
dc.contributor.authorLau, FCMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-26T06:31:19Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-26T06:31:19Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationDialm-Pomc'08: Proceedings Of The Acm 5Th International Workshop On Foundations Of Mobile Computing, 2008, p. 45-54en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/151946-
dc.description.abstractGiven n arbitrarily distributed single-hop wireless links, using the physical interference model, the objective is to minimize the scheduling length. This is an open problem (Problem 1) proposed by Locher et al. [21]. In this paper, we solve this open problem at the cost of moderately exponential time. Specifically, this paper gives two classes of exact and approximate link scheduling algorithms, one based on the somewhat straightforward link independent set covering, and the other on counting the number of set covers. Letp(n) denote the time of checking whether the spectral radius of an irreducible non-negative matrix is smaller than 1 or not, then the time complexity for the set covering based exact algorithm isO(2 n/ 2)), whereas the proposed counting based exact scheduling algorithm called ESA-MLSAT needs only time O(3n • n ■ log 2 n ■ p(n)) with polynomial space. If exponential space is allowed, the time complexity can be further reduced to O(2n ■ n ■ log 2 n ■ p(n)). The time complexity for the set covering based approximate algorithm is O(( n n/2)-logn ■ p(n)) with approximation ratio O(logn) . The time complexity of the first counting based approximation algorithm is O(n 2polylog(n)) with approximation ratio O(nlog n), the time complexity of the second counting based approximation algorithm is O(n 1+og3' og n polylog(n)) with approximation ratio O(njlog n), and the time complexity of the third counting based approximate algorithm is O((( n n/2) + 3 e n•n• logn)-logn-p(n)) with approximation ratio |(1 + s)|. All these approximation algorithms use polynomial space. © 2008 ACM.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDIALM-POMC'08: Proceedings of the ACM 5th International Workshop on Foundations of Mobile Computingen_US
dc.subjectAd Hoc Networksen_US
dc.subjectColoringen_US
dc.subjectConstraint Satisfaction Problemen_US
dc.subjectCountingen_US
dc.subjectInclusion-Exclusion Principleen_US
dc.subjectLink Schedulingen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Interference Modelen_US
dc.subjectSensor Networksen_US
dc.subjectSinren_US
dc.subjectWirelessen_US
dc.titleExact and approximate link scheduling algorithms under the physical interference modelen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailLau, FCM:fcmlau@cs.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLau, FCM=rp00221en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/1400863.1400874en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-65249127422en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-65249127422&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.spage45en_US
dc.identifier.epage54en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHua, QS=15060090400en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLau, FCM=7102749723en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats