File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.021
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84861610121
- PMID: 22651953
- WOS: WOS:000305456500015
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 20-item pain anxiety symptoms scale (ChPASS-20)
Title | Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 20-item pain anxiety symptoms scale (ChPASS-20) |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Chinese Chronic Pain Confirmatory Factor Analysis Pain Anxiety |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jpainsymman |
Citation | Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2012, v. 43 n. 6, p. 1131-1140 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Context: The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) was designed to assess pain-related anxiety and fear. Although the scale is a reliable measure with good psychometric properties, its validity among ethnic Chinese has yet to be evaluated. Objectives: This study aimed to translate the English-language version of the 20-item PASS into Chinese (ChPASS-20) and evaluate its factor structure, reliability, and validity. Methods: A total of 223 Chinese patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain attending orthopedic specialist clinics completed the ChPASS-20, the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire, the Chinese version of the 11-item Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and questions assessing sociodemographic and pain characteristics. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses showed that all the five-factor solutions tested met the minimum acceptable fit criterion. The four ChPASS-20 subscales and the entire scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's αs: 0.72-0.92). All ChPASS-20 scales showed significant positive correlations with depression, pain intensity, and disability. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that the ChPASS-20 total score predicted concurrent depression [F(4,159) = 11.97, P < 0.001], pain intensity [F(4,161) = 2.47, P < 0.05], and pain disability [F(4,191) = 5.47, P < 0.001] scores, and the ChPASS-20 Avoidance subscale (standardized beta coefficient = 0.21, P < 0.05) emerged as a significant independent predictor of concurrent pain disability. Conclusion: Our data support the factorial validity, reliability, and construct validity of the ChPASS-20 in a Chinese population. © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/151776 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.186 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wong, WS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mccracken, LM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fielding, R | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-26T06:28:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-26T06:28:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2012, v. 43 n. 6, p. 1131-1140 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0885-3924 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/151776 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Context: The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) was designed to assess pain-related anxiety and fear. Although the scale is a reliable measure with good psychometric properties, its validity among ethnic Chinese has yet to be evaluated. Objectives: This study aimed to translate the English-language version of the 20-item PASS into Chinese (ChPASS-20) and evaluate its factor structure, reliability, and validity. Methods: A total of 223 Chinese patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain attending orthopedic specialist clinics completed the ChPASS-20, the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire, the Chinese version of the 11-item Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and questions assessing sociodemographic and pain characteristics. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses showed that all the five-factor solutions tested met the minimum acceptable fit criterion. The four ChPASS-20 subscales and the entire scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's αs: 0.72-0.92). All ChPASS-20 scales showed significant positive correlations with depression, pain intensity, and disability. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that the ChPASS-20 total score predicted concurrent depression [F(4,159) = 11.97, P < 0.001], pain intensity [F(4,161) = 2.47, P < 0.05], and pain disability [F(4,191) = 5.47, P < 0.001] scores, and the ChPASS-20 Avoidance subscale (standardized beta coefficient = 0.21, P < 0.05) emerged as a significant independent predictor of concurrent pain disability. Conclusion: Our data support the factorial validity, reliability, and construct validity of the ChPASS-20 in a Chinese population. © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jpainsymman | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | en_US |
dc.rights | NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2012, v. 43 n. 6, p. 1131-1140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.021 | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Chinese | en_US |
dc.subject | Chronic Pain | en_US |
dc.subject | Confirmatory Factor Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Pain Anxiety | en_US |
dc.title | Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 20-item pain anxiety symptoms scale (ChPASS-20) | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Fielding, R:fielding@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Wong, WS: wingwong@ied.edu.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Fielding, R=rp00339 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | postprint | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.021 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22651953 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84861610121 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 200305 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84861610121&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 43 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 1131 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 1140 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000305456500015 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, WS=7403972073 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | McCracken, LM=7006807866 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fielding, R=7102200484 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 10724833 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0885-3924 | - |