File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000463
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84859917079
- WOS: WOS:000302947100001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Multicountry perspectives of relational contracting and integrated project teams
Title | Multicountry perspectives of relational contracting and integrated project teams |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Hong Kong Incentives Partnering Procurement Relational contracting |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pubs.asce.org/journals/co.html |
Citation | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2012, v. 138 n. 4, p. 469-480 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Worldwide calls for integration in construction translate into needs for relational alignment of both structural and operational arrangements, in order to successfully streamline the combined efforts of diverse interacting parties, for improved project delivery. Appropriate applications of relational contracting (RC) principles can help to achieve such integration. As such, the aims of the reported study are to examine the relative usefulness of various potential factors and strategies and to offer suitable contractual and noncontractual incentives, for building an RC culture and building integrated project teams (IPTs) in construction. Results from statistical analyses of 224 questionnaire responses from five countries are presented. Trust and trust-based operational arrangements are seen to effectively offer the required incentives for implementing various RC-based arrangements in construction where top management commitment and their support play a vital role. The choices of country-specific approaches suggest various patterns of integration through project-based partnering type RC, e.g.,cliental initiative and removing client related barriers in Hong Kong, removing uncongenial organizational and/or system-based barriers from the client's side in Australia, teamworking by cliental initiatives through contractual arrangements in The Netherlands, removing organizational and/or system-based barriers in the U.K., importance of trust and communication-related factors in Singapore, with no specific strategy in this respect. The outcomes also suggest the need for a highly interrelated and consolidated approach for spreading RC. Outcomes of this study are expected to benefit both industry practitioners and researchers in exploring, designing, and implementing various RC-based working arrangements. © 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/150666 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.071 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Rahman, MM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kumaraswamy, MM | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-26T06:06:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-26T06:06:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2012, v. 138 n. 4, p. 469-480 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0733-9364 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/150666 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Worldwide calls for integration in construction translate into needs for relational alignment of both structural and operational arrangements, in order to successfully streamline the combined efforts of diverse interacting parties, for improved project delivery. Appropriate applications of relational contracting (RC) principles can help to achieve such integration. As such, the aims of the reported study are to examine the relative usefulness of various potential factors and strategies and to offer suitable contractual and noncontractual incentives, for building an RC culture and building integrated project teams (IPTs) in construction. Results from statistical analyses of 224 questionnaire responses from five countries are presented. Trust and trust-based operational arrangements are seen to effectively offer the required incentives for implementing various RC-based arrangements in construction where top management commitment and their support play a vital role. The choices of country-specific approaches suggest various patterns of integration through project-based partnering type RC, e.g.,cliental initiative and removing client related barriers in Hong Kong, removing uncongenial organizational and/or system-based barriers from the client's side in Australia, teamworking by cliental initiatives through contractual arrangements in The Netherlands, removing organizational and/or system-based barriers in the U.K., importance of trust and communication-related factors in Singapore, with no specific strategy in this respect. The outcomes also suggest the need for a highly interrelated and consolidated approach for spreading RC. Outcomes of this study are expected to benefit both industry practitioners and researchers in exploring, designing, and implementing various RC-based working arrangements. © 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pubs.asce.org/journals/co.html | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | en_US |
dc.rights | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Copyright © American Society of Civil Engineers. | - |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | en_US |
dc.subject | Incentives | en_US |
dc.subject | Partnering | en_US |
dc.subject | Procurement | en_US |
dc.subject | Relational contracting | en_US |
dc.title | Multicountry perspectives of relational contracting and integrated project teams | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Rahman, MM: mrahman@dundee.ac.uk | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Kumaraswamy, MM: mohan@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Kumaraswamy, MM=rp00126 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000463 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84859917079 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 211810 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84859917079&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 138 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 469 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 480 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000302947100001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kumaraswamy, MM=35566270600 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Rahman, MM=35570458800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0733-9364 | - |