File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.10.012
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84155172834
- WOS: WOS:000300740200016
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Conflict or consensus: an investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong
Title | Conflict or consensus: an investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Construction Decision making Infrastructure planning Local participation Participatory approach |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Pergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/habitatint |
Citation | Habitat International, 2012, v. 36 n. 2, p. 333-342 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Public participation in the planning and design of major public infrastructure and construction (PIC) projects is crucial to their success, as the interests of different stakeholders can be systematically captured and built into the finalised scheme. However, public participation may not always yield a mutually acceptable solution, especially when the interests of stakeholders are diverse and conflicting. Confrontations and disputes can arise unless the concerns or needs of the community are carefully analysed and addressed. The aim of the paper is to propose a systematic method of analysing stakeholder concerns relating to PIC projects by examining the degree of consensus and/or conflict involved. The results of a questionnaire survey and a series of interviews with different entities are provided, which indicate the existence of a significant divergence of views among stakeholder groups and that conflicts arise when there is a mismatch between peoples' perception concerning money and happiness on the one hand and development and damages on the other. Policy and decision-makers should strive to resolve at least the majority of conflicts that arise throughout the lifecycle of major PIC projects so as to maximise their chance of success. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/150633 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.630 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Li, THY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, ST | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Skitmore, M | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-26T06:06:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-26T06:06:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Habitat International, 2012, v. 36 n. 2, p. 333-342 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0197-3975 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/150633 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Public participation in the planning and design of major public infrastructure and construction (PIC) projects is crucial to their success, as the interests of different stakeholders can be systematically captured and built into the finalised scheme. However, public participation may not always yield a mutually acceptable solution, especially when the interests of stakeholders are diverse and conflicting. Confrontations and disputes can arise unless the concerns or needs of the community are carefully analysed and addressed. The aim of the paper is to propose a systematic method of analysing stakeholder concerns relating to PIC projects by examining the degree of consensus and/or conflict involved. The results of a questionnaire survey and a series of interviews with different entities are provided, which indicate the existence of a significant divergence of views among stakeholder groups and that conflicts arise when there is a mismatch between peoples' perception concerning money and happiness on the one hand and development and damages on the other. Policy and decision-makers should strive to resolve at least the majority of conflicts that arise throughout the lifecycle of major PIC projects so as to maximise their chance of success. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Pergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/habitatint | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Habitat International | en_US |
dc.subject | Construction | en_US |
dc.subject | Decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | Infrastructure planning | en_US |
dc.subject | Local participation | en_US |
dc.subject | Participatory approach | - |
dc.title | Conflict or consensus: an investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Li, THY: hongyangli@yahoo.cn | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, ST: tstng@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Skitmore, M: rm.skitmore@qut.edu.au | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Ng, ST=rp00158 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.10.012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84155172834 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 204745 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84155172834&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 36 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 333 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 342 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000300740200016 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Skitmore, M=7003387239 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ng, ST=7403358853 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Li, THY=38861925000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 10101662 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0197-3975 | - |