File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00423-004-0467-x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-4344682610
- PMID: 15103466
- WOS: WOS:000223262300003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Small bowel obstruction following low anterior resection: The impact of diversion ileostomy
Title | Small bowel obstruction following low anterior resection: The impact of diversion ileostomy |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Ileostomy Rectal surgery Small bowel obstruction |
Issue Date | 2004 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00423/ |
Citation | Langenbeck's Archives Of Surgery, 2004, v. 389 n. 4, p. 250-255 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: The incidence of small bowel obstruction following rectal cancer surgery has not been well documented in the era of sphincter-preserving surgery. This report aimed to study the incidence, aetiologies and outcomes of small bowel obstruction in patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The factors that might affect the incidences of small bowel obstruction were analysed. Methods: Consecutive patients who had undergone low anterior resection for rectal cancer from August 1993 to March 1999 were studied. Patients with unplanned admissions, with the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction, were reviewed. The aetiologies and outcome of small bowel obstruction were documented. Results: Two hundred and fourteen patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 39 months; 22 patients presented with 30 episodes of small bowel obstruction, and operations were necessary in nine patients (40.9%). Malignant obstruction occurred in two patients (10.3%). Obstruction within 6 weeks of surgery (including closure of stoma) occurred in 13 patients (6.1%). Early obstruction occurred at a higher incidence in those patients who had had an ileostomy than in those who did not (9.1% vs 2.9%, P=0.048). Conclusion: Small bowel obstruction following rectal cancer surgery occurred in 10.3% of patients. The majority of the obstruction was benign in nature. The presence of diversion ileostomy was associated with an increased incidence of early obstruction, and the use of loop ileostomy for proximal diversion should be further assessed. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/147689 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.758 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Poon, JTC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Law, WL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chu, KW | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-29T06:07:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-05-29T06:07:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Langenbeck's Archives Of Surgery, 2004, v. 389 n. 4, p. 250-255 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1435-2443 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/147689 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The incidence of small bowel obstruction following rectal cancer surgery has not been well documented in the era of sphincter-preserving surgery. This report aimed to study the incidence, aetiologies and outcomes of small bowel obstruction in patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The factors that might affect the incidences of small bowel obstruction were analysed. Methods: Consecutive patients who had undergone low anterior resection for rectal cancer from August 1993 to March 1999 were studied. Patients with unplanned admissions, with the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction, were reviewed. The aetiologies and outcome of small bowel obstruction were documented. Results: Two hundred and fourteen patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 39 months; 22 patients presented with 30 episodes of small bowel obstruction, and operations were necessary in nine patients (40.9%). Malignant obstruction occurred in two patients (10.3%). Obstruction within 6 weeks of surgery (including closure of stoma) occurred in 13 patients (6.1%). Early obstruction occurred at a higher incidence in those patients who had had an ileostomy than in those who did not (9.1% vs 2.9%, P=0.048). Conclusion: Small bowel obstruction following rectal cancer surgery occurred in 10.3% of patients. The majority of the obstruction was benign in nature. The presence of diversion ileostomy was associated with an increased incidence of early obstruction, and the use of loop ileostomy for proximal diversion should be further assessed. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00423/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | en_HK |
dc.subject | Ileostomy | en_HK |
dc.subject | Rectal surgery | en_HK |
dc.subject | Small bowel obstruction | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 And Over | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Chi-Square Distribution | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Contrast Media | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Diatrizoate Meglumine - Diagnostic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Incidence | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Intestinal Obstruction - Diagnosis - Epidemiology - Etiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Intestine, Small | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Postoperative Complications - Diagnosis - Epidemiology - Etiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Rectal Neoplasms - Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | en_US |
dc.title | Small bowel obstruction following low anterior resection: The impact of diversion ileostomy | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Poon, JTC: tcjensen@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Law, WL: lawwl@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Poon, JTC=rp01603 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Law, WL=rp00436 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00423-004-0467-x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 15103466 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-4344682610 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-4344682610&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 389 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 250 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 255 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000223262300003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Germany | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Poon, JTC=7005903722 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Law, WL=7103147867 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chu, KW=7402453653 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1435-2443 | - |