File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1213/01.ane.0000185035.89265.3c
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-31444438662
- PMID: 16428574
- WOS: WOS:000234912900057
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A clinical comparison of the Flexiblade™ and Macintosh laryngoscopes for laryngeal exposure in anesthetized adults
Title | A clinical comparison of the Flexiblade™ and Macintosh laryngoscopes for laryngeal exposure in anesthetized adults |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org |
Citation | Anesthesia And Analgesia, 2006, v. 102 n. 2, p. 626-630 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The Flexiblade™ is a laryngoscope with a flexible blade. To evaluate the efficacy of the Flexiblade™ compared with the classic Macintosh laryngoscope, we performed a clinical study in 200 paralyzed patients undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Direct laryngoscopy was performed with a size 3 Macintosh laryngoscope and the Flexiblade™, with and without activation of the lever. The laryngeal views were recorded, without manipulation, according to the Cormack and Lehane classification. No laryngoscopic view obtained by the Macintosh blade was worse than that obtained by the Flexiblade™ without the lever activated. The Macintosh blade improved 58.5% of non-Grade I views obtained by the Flexiblade™ with its lever not activated. However, when the Flexiblade™ lever was activated, 39.6% of non-Grade I views obtained by the Macintosh blade were improved, whereas 84.5% of non-Grade I views obtained by the inactivated Flexiblade™ were improved. Activating the Flexiblade™ lever never caused a deterioration of view. In only one case was the view better with the Macintosh blade than that with the activated Flexiblade™. We conclude that the Flexiblade™, after lever activation, is significantly better than the Macintosh laryngoscope for laryngeal visualization in paralyzed adults (P < 0.0001). ©2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/147226 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.344 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, RWW | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Irwin, MG | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Law, BCW | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, CK | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-29T06:00:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-05-29T06:00:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Anesthesia And Analgesia, 2006, v. 102 n. 2, p. 626-630 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2999 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/147226 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Flexiblade™ is a laryngoscope with a flexible blade. To evaluate the efficacy of the Flexiblade™ compared with the classic Macintosh laryngoscope, we performed a clinical study in 200 paralyzed patients undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Direct laryngoscopy was performed with a size 3 Macintosh laryngoscope and the Flexiblade™, with and without activation of the lever. The laryngeal views were recorded, without manipulation, according to the Cormack and Lehane classification. No laryngoscopic view obtained by the Macintosh blade was worse than that obtained by the Flexiblade™ without the lever activated. The Macintosh blade improved 58.5% of non-Grade I views obtained by the Flexiblade™ with its lever not activated. However, when the Flexiblade™ lever was activated, 39.6% of non-Grade I views obtained by the Macintosh blade were improved, whereas 84.5% of non-Grade I views obtained by the inactivated Flexiblade™ were improved. Activating the Flexiblade™ lever never caused a deterioration of view. In only one case was the view better with the Macintosh blade than that with the activated Flexiblade™. We conclude that the Flexiblade™, after lever activation, is significantly better than the Macintosh laryngoscope for laryngeal visualization in paralyzed adults (P < 0.0001). ©2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Anesthesia and Analgesia | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adolescent | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Anesthesia, General | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Equipment Design | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Intubation, Intratracheal | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Laryngoscopes | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Laryngoscopy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.title | A clinical comparison of the Flexiblade™ and Macintosh laryngoscopes for laryngeal exposure in anesthetized adults | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Irwin, MG:mgirwin@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Irwin, MG=rp00390 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1213/01.ane.0000185035.89265.3c | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16428574 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-31444438662 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 109430 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-31444438662&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 102 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 626 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 630 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000234912900057 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0003-2999 | - |