File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1097/00000539-200302000-00018
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0037301966
- PMID: 12538184
- WOS: WOS:000180601400016
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: EMLA® cream versus dorsal penile nerve block for postcircumcision analgesia in children
Title | EMLA® cream versus dorsal penile nerve block for postcircumcision analgesia in children |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2003 |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org |
Citation | Anesthesia And Analgesia, 2003, v. 96 n. 2, p. 396-399 How to Cite? |
Abstract | We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial comparing preoperative application of EMLA® cream and sodium chloride solution dorsal penile block (n = 31) with placebo cream and bupivacaine dorsal penile nerve block (n = 32) for postcircumcision analgesia. Pain was assessed using modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale and the duration of block by the time to requirement of first dose of postoperative analgesic. There was no difference in Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale between the two groups, but bupivacaine dorsal penile nerve block resulted in longer analgesia (P = 0.003). There were no local or systemic complications related to either technique, and there was a very small incidence of vomiting. We conclude that preoperative application of EMLA® cream is an effective and simple method to produce postcircumcision analgesia with a very small incidence of adverse effects. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/147199 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.344 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Choi, WY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Irwin, MG | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hui, TWC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, HH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, KL | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-29T06:00:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-05-29T06:00:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Anesthesia And Analgesia, 2003, v. 96 n. 2, p. 396-399 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2999 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/147199 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial comparing preoperative application of EMLA® cream and sodium chloride solution dorsal penile block (n = 31) with placebo cream and bupivacaine dorsal penile nerve block (n = 32) for postcircumcision analgesia. Pain was assessed using modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale and the duration of block by the time to requirement of first dose of postoperative analgesic. There was no difference in Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale between the two groups, but bupivacaine dorsal penile nerve block resulted in longer analgesia (P = 0.003). There were no local or systemic complications related to either technique, and there was a very small incidence of vomiting. We conclude that preoperative application of EMLA® cream is an effective and simple method to produce postcircumcision analgesia with a very small incidence of adverse effects. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Anesthesia and Analgesia | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Acetaminophen - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Administration, Topical | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Analgesics, Opioid - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Anesthetics, Combined - Administration & Dosage - Adverse Effects - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Child | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Child, Preschool | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Circumcision, Male - Adverse Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Double-Blind Method | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Fentanyl - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Lidocaine - Administration & Dosage - Adverse Effects - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Nerve Block - Adverse Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pain Measurement - Drug Effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pain, Postoperative - Drug Therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Penis - Innervation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prilocaine - Administration & Dosage - Adverse Effects - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | en_US |
dc.title | EMLA® cream versus dorsal penile nerve block for postcircumcision analgesia in children | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Irwin, MG:mgirwin@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Irwin, MG=rp00390 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/00000539-200302000-00018 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 12538184 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0037301966 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0037301966&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 96 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 396 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 399 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000180601400016 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0003-2999 | - |