Article: Radio leaks: Presenting and contesting leaks in radio news broadcasts

File Download Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
Supplementary
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleRadio leaks: Presenting and contesting leaks in radio news broadcasts
AuthorsJaworski, A2
Fitzgerald, R1
Morris, D2
KeywordsDiscourse
Leaks
Radio news broadcasts
Temporality
Issue Date2004
PublisherSage Publications Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journal.aspx?pid=105704
CitationJournalism, 2004, v. 5 n. 2, p. 183-202 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146488490452003
AbstractThis paper analyzes the discursive construction and contestation of 'leaked' stories in news broadcast programmes. Drawing on a sample of BBC Radio 4 news programmes recorded between May and June 2000, we analyze four items of news presented as leaks about upcoming events. We suggest that these examples highlight the leaking of information as a valuable newsworthy commodity in that it not only allows news organizations to report what is going to be news before it happens but also enables speculative discourse as to the meaning of the event yet to happen. However, in order for a story to be accepted as a leak it must be seen to fulfil a number of criteria. With this in mind, we identify four features accompanying the introduction of the news items as leaks in the process of authentification: secrecy, authorship/ownership and future orientation. The article then discusses how these features are used when contesting the status of a news story as a leak, and how temporal play contributes to downgrading the content of the leak and, hence, its relevance, immediacy and newsworthiness. Copyright © 2004 SAGE Publications.
ISSN1464-8849
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.027
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146488490452003
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
DC Field
Value
dc.contributor.authorJaworski, A
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, R
dc.contributor.authorMorris, D
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-29T03:24:20Z
dc.date.available2012-05-29T03:24:20Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the discursive construction and contestation of 'leaked' stories in news broadcast programmes. Drawing on a sample of BBC Radio 4 news programmes recorded between May and June 2000, we analyze four items of news presented as leaks about upcoming events. We suggest that these examples highlight the leaking of information as a valuable newsworthy commodity in that it not only allows news organizations to report what is going to be news before it happens but also enables speculative discourse as to the meaning of the event yet to happen. However, in order for a story to be accepted as a leak it must be seen to fulfil a number of criteria. With this in mind, we identify four features accompanying the introduction of the news items as leaks in the process of authentification: secrecy, authorship/ownership and future orientation. The article then discusses how these features are used when contesting the status of a news story as a leak, and how temporal play contributes to downgrading the content of the leak and, hence, its relevance, immediacy and newsworthiness. Copyright © 2004 SAGE Publications.
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
dc.identifier.citationJournalism, 2004, v. 5 n. 2, p. 183-202 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146488490452003
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146488490452003
dc.identifier.epage202
dc.identifier.issn1464-8849
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.027
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-56549125511
dc.identifier.spage183
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/147158
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journal.aspx?pid=105704
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.relation.ispartofJournalism
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
dc.subjectDiscourse
dc.subjectLeaks
dc.subjectRadio news broadcasts
dc.subjectTemporality
dc.titleRadio leaks: Presenting and contesting leaks in radio news broadcasts
dc.typeArticle
Author Affiliations
  1. University of Queensland
  2. Cardiff University