File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Governing financial disputes in China: What have we learned from the Global Financial Crisis of 2008?

TitleGoverning financial disputes in China: What have we learned from the Global Financial Crisis of 2008?
Authors
Issue Date2012
PublisherUniversity of Pennsylvania Law School. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/ealr/
Citation
East Asia Law Review, 2012, v. 7 n. 1, p. 195-220 How to Cite?
AbstractIn light of the recent global financial crisis of 2008, this article critically compares how China's national arbitration commissions and local courts are responding to new challenges brought about by an increase in the number of banking related disputes. Drawing on comparative case analysis, the article examines the operation of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) and the Shanghai Courts' financial dispute resolution mechanisms in resolving financial disputes. Drawing on insights from selected case findings, it provides insight into which institution is best positioned to handle financial-related cases, discusses prospects for coordination between the two, and sets out proposals for further reform. Initial findings suggest that given CIETAC's limited exposure to banking and financial sector disputes, in the immediate term parties should seek resolution through local financial division dispute resolution mechanisms, such as the financial division of the Shanghai Courts. In the long term, prospects for greater strengthening of national mechanisms such as CIETAC and the Securities Dispute Resolution scheme will provide additional avenues of recourse.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146873
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, RHen_US
dc.contributor.authorAli, SF-
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-23T05:43:30Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-23T05:43:30Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationEast Asia Law Review, 2012, v. 7 n. 1, p. 195-220en_US
dc.identifier.issn1943-8249-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146873-
dc.description.abstractIn light of the recent global financial crisis of 2008, this article critically compares how China's national arbitration commissions and local courts are responding to new challenges brought about by an increase in the number of banking related disputes. Drawing on comparative case analysis, the article examines the operation of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) and the Shanghai Courts' financial dispute resolution mechanisms in resolving financial disputes. Drawing on insights from selected case findings, it provides insight into which institution is best positioned to handle financial-related cases, discusses prospects for coordination between the two, and sets out proposals for further reform. Initial findings suggest that given CIETAC's limited exposure to banking and financial sector disputes, in the immediate term parties should seek resolution through local financial division dispute resolution mechanisms, such as the financial division of the Shanghai Courts. In the long term, prospects for greater strengthening of national mechanisms such as CIETAC and the Securities Dispute Resolution scheme will provide additional avenues of recourse.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Pennsylvania Law School. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/ealr/-
dc.relation.ispartofEast Asia Law Reviewen_US
dc.titleGoverning financial disputes in China: What have we learned from the Global Financial Crisis of 2008?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailAli, SF: sali@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityAli, SF=rp01236en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros199811en_US
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage195-
dc.identifier.epage220-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats