File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: An evidence-based review of patient-reported outcome measures in dental implant research among dentate subjects

TitleAn evidence-based review of patient-reported outcome measures in dental implant research among dentate subjects
Authors
KeywordsDental implant
Outcome assessment
Quality of life
Issue Date2012
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPE
Citation
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2012, v. 39 suppl. 12, p. 193-201 How to Cite?
AbstractAIM: To conduct an evidence-based review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in dental implant research among dentate patients so as to gain an understanding of the use of such measures, and the potential evidence that can be gleaned from such studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A structured literature search was carried out in the MEDLINE database. Patient-related end-points in dental implant research were categorized with respect to type of outcome and reviewed. RESULTS: The initial search identified 3397 publications; full texts were obtained for 133 papers, and ultimately 31 'effective papers'. PROMs were primarily concerned with assessment of patient satisfaction/preference (71%, 22). A range of prosthetic treatments associated with dental implants were identified. Few studies were prospective studies that included pre-treatment assessments. There was a lack of standardization in the assessment of patient-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing use of PROMs in dental implant research among dentate patients for a range of prosthetic treatments. For the most part studies have been concerned with the assessment of patient satisfaction/preference but fail to employ standardized outcome assessment methods, which hampers understanding of the benefit of dental implant therapy from patients' perspectives.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146829
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
European Federation of Periodontology
Astra, Nobel Biocare and Straumann
Funding Information:

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. This workshop was financially supported by the European Federation of Periodontology and by unrestricted grants from Astra, Nobel Biocare and Straumann.

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, Cen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLam, Oen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLang, Nen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-23T05:28:06Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-23T05:28:06Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2012, v. 39 suppl. 12, p. 193-201en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146829-
dc.description.abstractAIM: To conduct an evidence-based review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in dental implant research among dentate patients so as to gain an understanding of the use of such measures, and the potential evidence that can be gleaned from such studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A structured literature search was carried out in the MEDLINE database. Patient-related end-points in dental implant research were categorized with respect to type of outcome and reviewed. RESULTS: The initial search identified 3397 publications; full texts were obtained for 133 papers, and ultimately 31 'effective papers'. PROMs were primarily concerned with assessment of patient satisfaction/preference (71%, 22). A range of prosthetic treatments associated with dental implants were identified. Few studies were prospective studies that included pre-treatment assessments. There was a lack of standardization in the assessment of patient-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing use of PROMs in dental implant research among dentate patients for a range of prosthetic treatments. For the most part studies have been concerned with the assessment of patient satisfaction/preference but fail to employ standardized outcome assessment methods, which hampers understanding of the benefit of dental implant therapy from patients' perspectives.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPEen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontologyen_HK
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com-
dc.subjectDental implanten_HK
dc.subjectOutcome assessmenten_HK
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_HK
dc.titleAn evidence-based review of patient-reported outcome measures in dental implant research among dentate subjectsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcGrath, C: mcgrathc@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailLam, O: ottolam@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailLang, N: nplang@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMcGrath, C=rp00037en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLam, O=rp01567en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLang, N=rp00031-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01841.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid22533956-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84858021315en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros199692en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84858021315&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume39en_HK
dc.identifier.issuesuppl. 12en_HK
dc.identifier.spage193en_HK
dc.identifier.epage201en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000300936500014-
dc.publisher.placeDenmarken_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, N=54417471700en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLam, O=36572015600en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcGrath, C=7102335507en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0303-6979-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats