File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Short implants (6 mm) installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs

TitleShort implants (6 mm) installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs
Authors
KeywordsExtraction socket
Hard tissue
Implant dentistry
Osseointegration
Peri-implant mucosa
Issue Date2012
PublisherWiley-Blackwell. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 5, p. 536-541 How to Cite?
AbstractAIM: To evaluate the effect of implant length (6 mm vs.11 mm) on osseointegration (bone-to-implant contact) of implants installed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In six Labrador dogs, the pulp tissue of the mesial roots of (3) P(3) was removed and the root canals were filled. Flaps were elevated bilaterally, the premolars hemi-sectioned and the distal roots removed. Recipient sites were prepared in the distal alveolus and a 6 mm or an 11 mm long implant was installed at the test and control sites, respectively. Non-submerged healing was allowed. After 4 months of healing, block sections of the implant sites were obtained for histological processing and peri-implant tissue assessment. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between test and control sites both for hard and soft tissue parameters. The bone-to-implant contact evaluated at the apical region of the implants was similar as well. Although not statistically significant, the location of the top of the bony crest at the buccal aspect was more apical in relation to the implant shoulder at the test compared with the control sites (2.0 +/- 1.4 and 1.2 +/- 1.1 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Shorter implants (6 mm) present with equal osseointegration than do longer implants (11 mm).
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146822
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.464
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.427
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy. The competent contributions of Mr Carlos Sebastiao Bianco (USP, Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histological processing, and of Dr Sara Ricci and Dr Boris Corazza for the help in the surgical sessions are highly appreciated. All the authors declare to have no conflict of interest with the materials used in the present study.

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBressan, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorSivolella, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorUrrutia, ZAen_US
dc.contributor.authorSalata, LAen_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-23T05:28:03Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-23T05:28:03Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 5, p. 536-541en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146822-
dc.description.abstractAIM: To evaluate the effect of implant length (6 mm vs.11 mm) on osseointegration (bone-to-implant contact) of implants installed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In six Labrador dogs, the pulp tissue of the mesial roots of (3) P(3) was removed and the root canals were filled. Flaps were elevated bilaterally, the premolars hemi-sectioned and the distal roots removed. Recipient sites were prepared in the distal alveolus and a 6 mm or an 11 mm long implant was installed at the test and control sites, respectively. Non-submerged healing was allowed. After 4 months of healing, block sections of the implant sites were obtained for histological processing and peri-implant tissue assessment. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between test and control sites both for hard and soft tissue parameters. The bone-to-implant contact evaluated at the apical region of the implants was similar as well. Although not statistically significant, the location of the top of the bony crest at the buccal aspect was more apical in relation to the implant shoulder at the test compared with the control sites (2.0 +/- 1.4 and 1.2 +/- 1.1 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Shorter implants (6 mm) present with equal osseointegration than do longer implants (11 mm).-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.comen_US
dc.subjectExtraction socket-
dc.subjectHard tissue-
dc.subjectImplant dentistry-
dc.subjectOsseointegration-
dc.subjectPeri-implant mucosa-
dc.titleShort implants (6 mm) installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP: nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailBotticelli, D: daniele.botticelli@ardec.it-
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02432.x-
dc.identifier.pmid22320391-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84859721251-
dc.identifier.hkuros199418en_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.spage536en_US
dc.identifier.epage541en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000302606800003-
dc.publisher.placeMalaysiaen_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats