File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: Believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch : a contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar
Title | Believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch : a contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | John Benjamins |
Citation | Believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch : a contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar. In Marzo, S ... (Eds.)(et al), Corpus studies in contrastive linguistics, p. 7-32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The so-called 'raising-to-subject' pattern that verbs of the type believe can occur in is usually treated as the passive alternative for the so-called 'raising-to-object' pattern. In addition to broadening the empirical basis for the opposite claim that the English and Dutch raising-to-subject (or 'nominative and infinitive') patterns have a special functionality which is different from that of the passive construction, this paper specifically examines the stronger proposition that this has always been the case. It empirically investigates whether this proposition holds equally well for English and Dutch through a comparison of the frequencies of believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject patterns in two diachronic corpora. The methodology makes use of Distinctive Collexeme Analysis. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/146454 |
ISBN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Noel, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Colleman, T | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-04-24T07:55:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-04-24T07:55:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch : a contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar. In Marzo, S ... (Eds.)(et al), Corpus studies in contrastive linguistics, p. 7-32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9789027202628 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/146454 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The so-called 'raising-to-subject' pattern that verbs of the type believe can occur in is usually treated as the passive alternative for the so-called 'raising-to-object' pattern. In addition to broadening the empirical basis for the opposite claim that the English and Dutch raising-to-subject (or 'nominative and infinitive') patterns have a special functionality which is different from that of the passive construction, this paper specifically examines the stronger proposition that this has always been the case. It empirically investigates whether this proposition holds equally well for English and Dutch through a comparison of the frequencies of believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject patterns in two diachronic corpora. The methodology makes use of Distinctive Collexeme Analysis. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Benjamins | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Corpus studies in contrastive linguistics | en_US |
dc.title | Believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch : a contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar | en_US |
dc.type | Book_Chapter | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Noel, D: dnoel@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Noel, D=rp01170 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 199213 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 32 | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | Amsterdam | en_US |
dc.customcontrol.immutable | yiu 130823 | - |