File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Role of teeth adjacent to implants installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog

TitleRole of teeth adjacent to implants installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog
Authors
KeywordsAdjacent teeth osseointegration
Animal study
Bone healing
Extraction socket
Implant dentistry
Issue Date2012
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 4, p. 402-408 How to Cite?
AbstractAIM: To evaluate the influence of the presence of both adjacent teeth on the level of alveolar bony crest at sites where implants were installed into the socket immediately after tooth extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six Labrador dogs were used. Extractions of all teeth from the second premolar to the first molar were performed in the right side of the mandible, after full-thickness flap elevation. In the left side of the mandible, an endodontic treatment of the mesial root of the third and fourth premolars was performed. Full-thickness flaps were elevated, the teeth hemi-sected, and the distal roots removed. Immediately after, implants were bilaterally installed with the margin flush to the buccal bony crest. The implants were placed in the center of the alveolus at the third premolars and toward the lingual bony plate of the alveolus at the fourth premolars. After 3 months of healing, the animals were euthanized. RESULTS: All implants were integrated in mature bone. More bone resorption was observed at the test compared to the control sites. At the buccal aspect, a resorption of 2.8 +/- 0.5 and 1.6 +/- 0.4 mm at the third premolars and of 2.4 +/- 0.6 and 0.8 +/- 0.7 mm at the fourth premolars were found, at the test and control sites, respectively. At the lingual aspect, the bony crest was apically located in relation to the implant shoulder 1.5 +/- 0.3 and 0.5 +/- 0.5 mm at the third premolars and 1.6 +/- 0.6 and 0.3 +/- 1.1 mm at the fourth premolars, at the test and control sites, respectively. A lower buccal bone resorption was found at the control implants placed lingually. CONCLUSION: Multiple extractions of teeth adjacent to a socket into which implants were installed immediately after, tooth extraction induced more alveolar bone recession compared to sites where the adjacent teeth were preserved. Moreover, an implant placed more lingually yielded less recession of the buccal aspect of the implant.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146378
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.021
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.407
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a grant from ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy. Implants and components were donated by (Nobel Biocare Holding AG, Kloten, Switzerland). The competent contributions of Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histologic processing are highly appreciated. All the authors declare to have no conflict of interest with the materials used in the present study.

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFavero, Gen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_HK
dc.contributor.authorFavero, Gen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLeón, IGen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSalata, LAen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, Den_HK
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-24T07:50:02Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-24T07:50:02Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_HK
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 4, p. 402-408en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146378-
dc.description.abstractAIM: To evaluate the influence of the presence of both adjacent teeth on the level of alveolar bony crest at sites where implants were installed into the socket immediately after tooth extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six Labrador dogs were used. Extractions of all teeth from the second premolar to the first molar were performed in the right side of the mandible, after full-thickness flap elevation. In the left side of the mandible, an endodontic treatment of the mesial root of the third and fourth premolars was performed. Full-thickness flaps were elevated, the teeth hemi-sected, and the distal roots removed. Immediately after, implants were bilaterally installed with the margin flush to the buccal bony crest. The implants were placed in the center of the alveolus at the third premolars and toward the lingual bony plate of the alveolus at the fourth premolars. After 3 months of healing, the animals were euthanized. RESULTS: All implants were integrated in mature bone. More bone resorption was observed at the test compared to the control sites. At the buccal aspect, a resorption of 2.8 +/- 0.5 and 1.6 +/- 0.4 mm at the third premolars and of 2.4 +/- 0.6 and 0.8 +/- 0.7 mm at the fourth premolars were found, at the test and control sites, respectively. At the lingual aspect, the bony crest was apically located in relation to the implant shoulder 1.5 +/- 0.3 and 0.5 +/- 0.5 mm at the third premolars and 1.6 +/- 0.6 and 0.3 +/- 1.1 mm at the fourth premolars, at the test and control sites, respectively. A lower buccal bone resorption was found at the control implants placed lingually. CONCLUSION: Multiple extractions of teeth adjacent to a socket into which implants were installed immediately after, tooth extraction induced more alveolar bone recession compared to sites where the adjacent teeth were preserved. Moreover, an implant placed more lingually yielded less recession of the buccal aspect of the implant.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_HK
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com-
dc.subjectAdjacent teeth osseointegration-
dc.subjectAnimal study-
dc.subjectBone healing-
dc.subjectExtraction socket-
dc.subjectImplant dentistry-
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Process - surgery-
dc.subject.meshBone Resorption-
dc.subject.meshDental Abutments-
dc.subject.meshDental Implants, Single-Tooth-
dc.subject.meshTooth Socket - surgery-
dc.titleRole of teeth adjacent to implants installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dogen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP: nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02343.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid22092769-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84858076119en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros199127en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84858076119&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume23en_HK
dc.identifier.issue4en_HK
dc.identifier.spage402en_HK
dc.identifier.epage408en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000301175100003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBotticelli, D=6601962395en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSalata, LA=6603503456en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLeón, IG=53663895900en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFavero, G=53663415000en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFavero, G=7005901621en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0905-7161-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats