File Download
 
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
 
Supplementary

Article: Influence of implants with different sizes and configurations installed immediately into extraction sockets on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an experimental study in dogs
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleInfluence of implants with different sizes and configurations installed immediately into extraction sockets on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an experimental study in dogs
 
AuthorsCaneva, M1
Botticelli, D1
Rossi, F1
Cardoso, LC3
Pantani, F1
Lang, NP2
 
Issue Date2012
 
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
 
CitationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 4, p. 396-401 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02310.x
 
AbstractAIM: To study the influence on the healing of soft and hard peri-implant tissues when implants of different sizes and configurations were installed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Transmucosal cylindrical implants, 3.3 mm in diameter in the control sites, and conical 5 mm in diameter in the test sites, were installed into the distal socket of the fourth mandibular premolars in dogs immediately after tooth extraction. After 4 months, the hard and soft tissue healing was evaluated histologically. RESULTS: All implants were integrated in mineralized mature bone. Both at the test and control sites, the alveolar crest underwent resorption. The buccal bony surface at the implant test sites (conical; 3.8 mm) was more resorbed compared with the control sites (cylindrical; 1.6 mm). The soft tissue dimensions were similar in both groups. However, in relation to the implant shoulder, the peri-implant mucosa was located more apically at the test compared with the control sites. CONCLUSION: The present study confirmed that the distance between the implant surface and the outer contour of the buccal alveolar bony crest influenced the degree of resorption of the buccal bone plate. Consequently, in relation to the implant shoulder, the peri-implant mucosa will be established at a more apical level, if the distance between the implant surface and the outer contour of the alveolar crest is small.
 
ISSN0905-7161
2013 Impact Factor: 3.123
 
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02310.x
 
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000301175100002
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italy
ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italy and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy. The competent contributions of Professor Luiz Antonio Salata and Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histologic processing are highly appreciated. Conflict of interest: All the authors declare to have no conflict of interest with the materials used in the present study.

 
DC FieldValue
dc.contributor.authorCaneva, M
 
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, D
 
dc.contributor.authorRossi, F
 
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, LC
 
dc.contributor.authorPantani, F
 
dc.contributor.authorLang, NP
 
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-24T07:50:02Z
 
dc.date.available2012-04-24T07:50:02Z
 
dc.date.issued2012
 
dc.description.abstractAIM: To study the influence on the healing of soft and hard peri-implant tissues when implants of different sizes and configurations were installed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Transmucosal cylindrical implants, 3.3 mm in diameter in the control sites, and conical 5 mm in diameter in the test sites, were installed into the distal socket of the fourth mandibular premolars in dogs immediately after tooth extraction. After 4 months, the hard and soft tissue healing was evaluated histologically. RESULTS: All implants were integrated in mineralized mature bone. Both at the test and control sites, the alveolar crest underwent resorption. The buccal bony surface at the implant test sites (conical; 3.8 mm) was more resorbed compared with the control sites (cylindrical; 1.6 mm). The soft tissue dimensions were similar in both groups. However, in relation to the implant shoulder, the peri-implant mucosa was located more apically at the test compared with the control sites. CONCLUSION: The present study confirmed that the distance between the implant surface and the outer contour of the buccal alveolar bony crest influenced the degree of resorption of the buccal bone plate. Consequently, in relation to the implant shoulder, the peri-implant mucosa will be established at a more apical level, if the distance between the implant surface and the outer contour of the alveolar crest is small.
 
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
 
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 4, p. 396-401 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02310.x
 
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02310.x
 
dc.identifier.epage401
 
dc.identifier.hkuros199126
 
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000301175100002
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italy
ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italy and by ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italy. The competent contributions of Professor Luiz Antonio Salata and Mr. Sebastiao Bianco (USP - Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) in the histologic processing are highly appreciated. Conflict of interest: All the authors declare to have no conflict of interest with the materials used in the present study.

 
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
2013 Impact Factor: 3.123
 
dc.identifier.issue4
 
dc.identifier.pmid22092491
 
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84858010106
 
dc.identifier.spage396
 
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146377
 
dc.identifier.volume23
 
dc.languageeng
 
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
 
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
 
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research
 
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com
 
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Process - surgery
 
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
 
dc.subject.meshDental Implants, Single-Tooth
 
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis Design
 
dc.subject.meshTooth Socket - surgery
 
dc.titleInfluence of implants with different sizes and configurations installed immediately into extraction sockets on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an experimental study in dogs
 
dc.typeArticle
 
<?xml encoding="utf-8" version="1.0"?>
<item><contributor.author>Caneva, M</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Botticelli, D</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Rossi, F</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Cardoso, LC</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Pantani, F</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Lang, NP</contributor.author>
<date.accessioned>2012-04-24T07:50:02Z</date.accessioned>
<date.available>2012-04-24T07:50:02Z</date.available>
<date.issued>2012</date.issued>
<identifier.citation>Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 4, p. 396-401</identifier.citation>
<identifier.issn>0905-7161</identifier.issn>
<identifier.uri>http://hdl.handle.net/10722/146377</identifier.uri>
<description.abstract>AIM: To study the influence on the healing of soft and hard peri-implant tissues when implants of different sizes and configurations were installed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Transmucosal cylindrical implants, 3.3 mm in diameter in the control sites, and conical 5 mm in diameter in the test sites, were installed into the distal socket of the fourth mandibular premolars in dogs immediately after tooth extraction. After 4 months, the hard and soft tissue healing was evaluated histologically. RESULTS: All implants were integrated in mineralized mature bone. Both at the test and control sites, the alveolar crest underwent resorption. The buccal bony surface at the implant test sites (conical; 3.8 mm) was more resorbed compared with the control sites (cylindrical; 1.6 mm). The soft tissue dimensions were similar in both groups. However, in relation to the implant shoulder, the peri-implant mucosa was located more apically at the test compared with the control sites. CONCLUSION: The present study confirmed that the distance between the implant surface and the outer contour of the buccal alveolar bony crest influenced the degree of resorption of the buccal bone plate. Consequently, in relation to the implant shoulder, the peri-implant mucosa will be established at a more apical level, if the distance between the implant surface and the outer contour of the alveolar crest is small.</description.abstract>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal&apos;s web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR</publisher>
<relation.ispartof>Clinical Oral Implants Research</relation.ispartof>
<rights>The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com</rights>
<subject.mesh>Alveolar Process - surgery</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Tooth Socket - surgery</subject.mesh>
<title>Influence of implants with different sizes and configurations installed immediately into extraction sockets on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an experimental study in dogs</title>
<type>Article</type>
<description.nature>Link_to_subscribed_fulltext</description.nature>
<identifier.doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02310.x</identifier.doi>
<identifier.pmid>22092491</identifier.pmid>
<identifier.scopus>eid_2-s2.0-84858010106</identifier.scopus>
<identifier.hkuros>199126</identifier.hkuros>
<identifier.volume>23</identifier.volume>
<identifier.issue>4</identifier.issue>
<identifier.spage>396</identifier.spage>
<identifier.epage>401</identifier.epage>
<identifier.isi>WOS:000301175100002</identifier.isi>
<publisher.place>United States</publisher.place>
</item>
Author Affiliations
  1. Oral Surgery Division
  2. Prince Philip Dental Hospital
  3. Improvement School