File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01348.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79551502789
- PMID: 21091874
- WOS: WOS:000286888500005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Variation in the management of hypothetical cases of acute agitation in Australasian emergency departments
Title | Variation in the management of hypothetical cases of acute agitation in Australasian emergency departments | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||
Keywords | Aggression Emergency medicine Pharmaceutical preparation Questionnaire Violence | ||||
Issue Date | 2011 | ||||
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/EMA | ||||
Citation | Ema - Emergency Medicine Australasia, 2011, v. 23 n. 1, p. 23-32 How to Cite? | ||||
Abstract | Objective: To describe the prescribing practice of emergency medicine clinicians in the management of highly agitated patients and to identify perceived barriers to management and the gaps in training. Method: We undertook an anonymous cross-sectional mail survey of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) members (fellows and advanced trainees) between June and September 2009. A questionnaire including a case vignette of a hypothetical patient and three clinical scenarios was employed to ascertain prescribing practice and assess perceived barriers to management, confidence and the perceived usefulness of existing and future Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). Results: All 2052 ACEM members were surveyed. However, seven had incorrect postal addresses and could not be reached. Of the remaining 2045, 786/2052 (38.3%, 95% CI 36.2-40.5) responses were received. Of the 786 respondents, 783 were practicing clinicians. If monotherapy was chosen, 622/783 (79.4%, 95% CI 76.4-82.2) of respondents preferred midazolam to manage the common scenario where no history was available, followed by haloperidol 45/783 (5.8%, 95% CI 4.3-7.7) and olanzapine 38/783 (4.9%, 95% CI 3.5-6.7). Most respondents 500/783 (63.9%, 95% CI 60.4-67.2) would also administer another sedative (combination therapy). Important perceived barriers to agitation management included lack of both training (352/783 [45.0%, 95% CI 41.4-48.5]) and a national CPG (313/783 [40.0%, 95% CI 36.5-43.5]). Respondents were generally confident in all aspects of management, although relatively fewer trainees were confident in determining dosing. Institutional CPGs were considered most useful for 415/783 (53.0%, 95% CI 49.4-56.5) respondents. If an ACEM-endorsed CPG were to be developed in the future, 634/783 (81.0%, 95% CI 78.0-83.6) respondents would consider this useful. Conclusion: There is considerable variation in the management of hypothetical cases of acute agitation in Australasian EDs. Benzodiazepines and antipsychotics, either alone or in combination, are commonly used. An ACEM-endorsed, Australasian CPG was perceived as useful. © 2010 The Authors. EMA © 2010 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine. | ||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/145477 | ||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.755 | ||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: EWC was supported by an Ian Scott PhD scholarship from the Australian Rotary Heath Research Fund. | ||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, EWY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Taylor, DM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Knott, JC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Kong, DCM | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-23T12:11:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-23T12:11:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Ema - Emergency Medicine Australasia, 2011, v. 23 n. 1, p. 23-32 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1742-6731 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/145477 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To describe the prescribing practice of emergency medicine clinicians in the management of highly agitated patients and to identify perceived barriers to management and the gaps in training. Method: We undertook an anonymous cross-sectional mail survey of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) members (fellows and advanced trainees) between June and September 2009. A questionnaire including a case vignette of a hypothetical patient and three clinical scenarios was employed to ascertain prescribing practice and assess perceived barriers to management, confidence and the perceived usefulness of existing and future Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). Results: All 2052 ACEM members were surveyed. However, seven had incorrect postal addresses and could not be reached. Of the remaining 2045, 786/2052 (38.3%, 95% CI 36.2-40.5) responses were received. Of the 786 respondents, 783 were practicing clinicians. If monotherapy was chosen, 622/783 (79.4%, 95% CI 76.4-82.2) of respondents preferred midazolam to manage the common scenario where no history was available, followed by haloperidol 45/783 (5.8%, 95% CI 4.3-7.7) and olanzapine 38/783 (4.9%, 95% CI 3.5-6.7). Most respondents 500/783 (63.9%, 95% CI 60.4-67.2) would also administer another sedative (combination therapy). Important perceived barriers to agitation management included lack of both training (352/783 [45.0%, 95% CI 41.4-48.5]) and a national CPG (313/783 [40.0%, 95% CI 36.5-43.5]). Respondents were generally confident in all aspects of management, although relatively fewer trainees were confident in determining dosing. Institutional CPGs were considered most useful for 415/783 (53.0%, 95% CI 49.4-56.5) respondents. If an ACEM-endorsed CPG were to be developed in the future, 634/783 (81.0%, 95% CI 78.0-83.6) respondents would consider this useful. Conclusion: There is considerable variation in the management of hypothetical cases of acute agitation in Australasian EDs. Benzodiazepines and antipsychotics, either alone or in combination, are commonly used. An ACEM-endorsed, Australasian CPG was perceived as useful. © 2010 The Authors. EMA © 2010 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Asia. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/EMA | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia | en_HK |
dc.subject | Aggression | en_HK |
dc.subject | Emergency medicine | en_HK |
dc.subject | Pharmaceutical preparation | en_HK |
dc.subject | Questionnaire | en_HK |
dc.subject | Violence | en_HK |
dc.title | Variation in the management of hypothetical cases of acute agitation in Australasian emergency departments | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, EWY: ewchan@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Chan, EWY=rp01587 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01348.x | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21091874 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79551502789 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79551502789&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 23 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 23 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 32 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1742-6723 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000286888500005 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Australia | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, EWY=14043219000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Taylor, DM=35512837000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Knott, JC=7102964211 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kong, DCM=7202350808 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 8788476 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1742-6723 | - |