Article: On the relation between action selection and movement control in 5- to 9-month-old infants
File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00221-011-2645-8
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79958249702
- PMID: 21461601
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
-
Appears in Collections:
| Title | On the relation between action selection and movement control in 5- to 9-month-old infants |
|---|---|
| Authors | van Wermeskerken, M3 van der Kamp, J1 3 Savelsbergh, GJP2 3 |
| Keywords | Biomedicine Neurosciences Neurology |
| Issue Date | 2011 |
| Publisher | Springer Berlin / Heidelberg |
| Citation | Experimental Brain Research, 2011, v. 211, n. 1, p. 51-62 [How to Cite?] DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2645-8 |
| Abstract | Although 5-month-old infants select action modes that are adaptive to the size of the object (i.e., one- or two-handed reaching), it has largely remained unclear whether infants of this age control the ensuing movement to the size of the object (i.e., scaling of the aperture between hands). We examined 5-, 7-, and 9-month-olds' reaching behaviors to gain more insight into the developmental changes occurring in the visual guidance of action mode selection and movement control, and the relationship between these processes. Infants were presented with a small set of objects (i.e., 2, 3, 7, and 8 cm) and a large set of objects (i.e., 6, 9, 12, and 15 cm). For the first set of objects, it was found that the infants more often performed two-handed reaches for the larger objects based on visual information alone (i.e., before making contact with the object), thus showing adaptive action mode selection relative to object size. Kinematical analyses of the two-handed reaches for the second set of objects revealed that inter-trial variance in aperture between the hands decreased with the approach toward the object, indicating that infants' reaching is constrained by the object. Subsequent analysis showed that between hand aperture scaled to object size, indicating that visual control of the movement is adjusted to object size in infants as young as 5 months. Individual analyses indicated that the two processes were not dependent and followed distinct developmental trajectories. That is, adaptive selection of an action mode was not a prerequisite for appropriate aperture scaling, and vice versa. These findings are consistent with the idea of two separate and independent visual systems (Milner and Goodale in Neuropsychologia 46:774-785, 2008) during early infancy. © 2011 The Author(s). |
| ISSN | 0014-4819 2011 Impact Factor: 2.395 2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.154 |
| DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2645-8 |
| ISI Accession Number ID | WOS:000290036900005 |
| PubMed Central ID | PMC3084940 |
| References | Barrett TM, Traupman E, Needham A (2008) Infants’ visual anticipation of object structure in grasp planning. Infant Behav Dev 31:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.05.004 Bertenthal BI (1996) Origins and early development of perception, action, and representation. Annu Rev Psychol 47:431–459. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.431 Bootsma RJ, van Wieringen PC (1990) Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:21–29. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.21 Bruner JS, Koslowski B (1972) Visually preadapted constituents of manipulatory action. Perception 1:3–14. doi: 10.1068/p010003 Bushnell EW (1985) The decline of visually guided reaching during infancy. Infant Behav Dev 8:139–155. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(85)80002-3 Corbetta D, Snapp-Childs W (2009) Seeing and touching: the role of sensory-motor experience on the development of infant reaching. Infant Behav Dev 32:44–58. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.10.004 Corbetta D, Thelen E (1996) The development origins of bimanual coordination: a dynamic perspective. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:502–522. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.502 Corbetta D, Thelen E, Johnson K (2000) Motor constraints on the development of perception-action matching in infant reaching. Infant Behav Dev 23:351–371. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00049-2 Crajé C, van der Kamp J, Steenbergen B (2008) The effect of the “rod-and-frame” illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task. Exp Brain Res 185:53–62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1130-x Dijkerman HC, McIntosh RD, Schindler I, Nijboer TCW, Milner AD (2009) Choosing between alternative wrist postures: action planning needs perception. Neuropsychologia 47:1476–1482. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.002 Fagard J (2000) Linked proximal and distal changes in the reaching behavior of 5-to 12-month-old human infants grasping objects of different sizes. Infant Behav Dev 23:317–329. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00047-9 Fagard J, Pezé A (1997) Age changes in interlimb coupling and the development of bimanual coordination. J Motor Behav 29:199–208. doi: 10.1080/00222899709600835 Gesell A (1946) The ontogenesis of infant behavior. In: Carmichael L (ed) Manual of child psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 295–331. doi: 10.1037/10756-006 Glover S (2004) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci 27:3–78 Hesse C, Deubel H (2009) Changes in grasping kinematics due to different start postures of the hand. Hum Mov Sci 28:415–436. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.03.001 Kuypers HGJM (1962) Corticospinal connections: postnatal development in the rhesus monkey. Science 138:678–680. doi: 10.1126/science.138.3541.678 Lee MH, Liu YT, Newell KM (2006) Longitudinal expressions of infant’s prehension as a function of object properties. Infant Behav Dev 29:481–493. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.05.004 Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athenes S (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Mov Sci 9:149–176. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(90)90025-9 Milner AD, Goodale MA (2008) Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 46:774–785. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.005 Newell KM, Scully DM, McDonald PV, Baillargeon R (1989a) Task constraints and infant grip configurations. Dev Psychobiol 22:817–831. doi: 10.1002/dev.420220806 Newell KM, Scully DM, Tenenbaum F, Hardiman S (1989b) Body scale and the development of prehension. Dev Psychobiol 22:1–13. doi: 10.1002/dev.420220102 Newell KM, McDonald PV, Baillargeon R (1993) Body scale and infant grip configurations. Dev Psychobiol 26:195–205. doi: 10.1002/dev.420260403 Newman C, Atkinson J, Braddick O (2001) The development of reaching and looking preferences in infants to objects of different sizes. Dev Psychol 37:561–572. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.561 Rosenbaum DA, Vaughan J, Barnes HJ, Jorgensen MJ (1992) Time course of movement planning: selection of hand grips for object manipulation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 18:1058–1073. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1058 Schot WD, Brenner E, Smeets JB (2010) Robust movement segmentation by combining multiple sources of information. J Neurosci Methods 187:147–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.004 Siddiqui A (1995) Object size as a determinant of grasping in infancy. J Genet Psychol 156:345–358. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1995.9914828 Smeets JB, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Mot Control 3:237–271 Stelmach GE, Castiello U, Jeannerod M (1994) Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. J Motor Behav 26:178–186. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1994.9941672 Timmann D, Stelmach GE, Bloedel JR (1996) Grasping component alterations and limb transport. Exp Brain Res 108:486–492. doi: 10.1007/BF00227271 Tresilian JR, Stelmach GE (1997) Common organization for unimanual and bimanual reach-to-grasp tasks. Exp Brain Res 115:283–299. doi: 10.1007/PL00005697 van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP (2000) Action and perception in infancy. Infant Behav Dev 23:237–251. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00071-6 van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP, Davis WE (1998) Body-scaled ratio as a control parameter for prehension in 5- to 9-year-old children. Dev Psychobiol 33:351–361. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199812)33:4%3C351::AID-DEV6%3E3.0.CO;2-P van Doorn H, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJ (2007) Grasping the Muller-Lyer illusion: the contributions of vision for perception in action. Neuropsychologia 45:1939–1947. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.008 van Hof P, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP (2002) The relation of unimanual and bimanual reaching to crossing the midline. Child Dev 73:1353–1362. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00476 van Hof P, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP (2008) The relation between infants’ perception of catchableness and the control of catching. Dev Psychol 44:182–194. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.182 van Soest AJ, Beek PJ (2010) Similar findings, different interpretations: a response to the commentary by Bootsma (2010). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:1064–1066. doi: 10.1037/a0020059 van Wermeskerken M, van der Kamp J, te Velde AF, Valero-Garcia AV, Hoozemans MJM, Savelsbergh GJP (2011) Anticipatory reaching of seven- to eleven-month-old infants in occlusion situations. Infant Behav Dev 34:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.09.005 von Hofsten C, Fazel-Zandy S (1984) Development of visually guided hand orientation in reaching. J Exp Child Psychol 38:208–219. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90122-X von Hofsten C, Roennqvist L (1988) Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:610–621. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.4.610 Wallace SA, Weeks DL, Kelso JAS (1990) Temporal constraints in reaching and grasping behavior. Hum Mov Sci 9:69–93. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(90)90036-D Warren WH, Whang S (1987) Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body scaled information for affordances. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:371–383. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.13.3.371 Atkinson J (2000) The developing visual brain. Oxford University Press, Oxford Halverson HM (1931) An experimental study of prehension in infants by means of systematic cinema records. Genetic Psychol Monogr 10:107–286 Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance, IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 153–168 Kuypers HGJM (1982) A new look at the organization of the motor system. In: Kuypers HGJM, Martin GF (eds) Progress in brain research, vol. 57. Descending pathways to the spinal cord. Elsevier Biomedical, Amsterdam, pp 381–404 Newell KM (1986) Constraints on the development of action. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA (eds) Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Martinus-Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 341–360 van der Kamp J, Rivas F, van Doorn H, Savelsbergh G (2008) Ventral and dorsal system contributions to visual anticipation in fast ball sports. Int J Sport Psychol 39:100–130 van Wermeskerken M, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP (2010) The early development of the use of visual information for action and perception. In: Elliott D, Khan M (eds) Vision and goal-directed movement: neurobehavioral perspectives. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 293–313 Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movements. Psychol Rev Monogr 3:1–119 |
| dc.contributor.author | van Wermeskerken, M |
|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | van der Kamp, J |
| dc.contributor.author | Savelsbergh, GJP |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-21T05:44:32Z |
| dc.date.available | 2012-02-21T05:44:32Z |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 |
| dc.description.abstract | Although 5-month-old infants select action modes that are adaptive to the size of the object (i.e., one- or two-handed reaching), it has largely remained unclear whether infants of this age control the ensuing movement to the size of the object (i.e., scaling of the aperture between hands). We examined 5-, 7-, and 9-month-olds' reaching behaviors to gain more insight into the developmental changes occurring in the visual guidance of action mode selection and movement control, and the relationship between these processes. Infants were presented with a small set of objects (i.e., 2, 3, 7, and 8 cm) and a large set of objects (i.e., 6, 9, 12, and 15 cm). For the first set of objects, it was found that the infants more often performed two-handed reaches for the larger objects based on visual information alone (i.e., before making contact with the object), thus showing adaptive action mode selection relative to object size. Kinematical analyses of the two-handed reaches for the second set of objects revealed that inter-trial variance in aperture between the hands decreased with the approach toward the object, indicating that infants' reaching is constrained by the object. Subsequent analysis showed that between hand aperture scaled to object size, indicating that visual control of the movement is adjusted to object size in infants as young as 5 months. Individual analyses indicated that the two processes were not dependent and followed distinct developmental trajectories. That is, adaptive selection of an action mode was not a prerequisite for appropriate aperture scaling, and vice versa. These findings are consistent with the idea of two separate and independent visual systems (Milner and Goodale in Neuropsychologia 46:774-785, 2008) during early infancy. © 2011 The Author(s). |
| dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version |
| dc.description.other | Springer Open Choice, 21 Feb 2012 |
| dc.identifier.citation | Experimental Brain Research, 2011, v. 211, n. 1, p. 51-62 [How to Cite?] DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2645-8 |
| dc.identifier.citeulike | 9106524 |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2645-8 |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1432-1106 |
| dc.identifier.epage | 62 |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000290036900005 |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0014-4819 2011 Impact Factor: 2.395 2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.154 |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 |
| dc.identifier.openurl | |
| dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC3084940 |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 21461601 |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79958249702 |
| dc.identifier.spage | 51 |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/145059 |
| dc.identifier.volume | 211 |
| dc.language | Eng |
| dc.publisher | Springer Berlin / Heidelberg |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Experimental Brain Research |
| dc.relation.references | Barrett TM, Traupman E, Needham A (2008) Infants’ visual anticipation of object structure in grasp planning. Infant Behav Dev 31:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.05.004 |
| dc.relation.references | Bertenthal BI (1996) Origins and early development of perception, action, and representation. Annu Rev Psychol 47:431–459. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.431 |
| dc.relation.references | Bootsma RJ, van Wieringen PC (1990) Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:21–29. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.21 |
| dc.relation.references | Bruner JS, Koslowski B (1972) Visually preadapted constituents of manipulatory action. Perception 1:3–14. doi: 10.1068/p010003 |
| dc.relation.references | Bushnell EW (1985) The decline of visually guided reaching during infancy. Infant Behav Dev 8:139–155. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(85)80002-3 |
| dc.relation.references | Corbetta D, Snapp-Childs W (2009) Seeing and touching: the role of sensory-motor experience on the development of infant reaching. Infant Behav Dev 32:44–58. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.10.004 |
| dc.relation.references | Corbetta D, Thelen E (1996) The development origins of bimanual coordination: a dynamic perspective. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:502–522. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.502 |
| dc.relation.references | Corbetta D, Thelen E, Johnson K (2000) Motor constraints on the development of perception-action matching in infant reaching. Infant Behav Dev 23:351–371. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00049-2 |
| dc.relation.references | Crajé C, van der Kamp J, Steenbergen B (2008) The effect of the “rod-and-frame” illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task. Exp Brain Res 185:53–62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1130-x |
| dc.relation.references | Dijkerman HC, McIntosh RD, Schindler I, Nijboer TCW, Milner AD (2009) Choosing between alternative wrist postures: action planning needs perception. Neuropsychologia 47:1476–1482. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.002 |
| dc.relation.references | Fagard J (2000) Linked proximal and distal changes in the reaching behavior of 5-to 12-month-old human infants grasping objects of different sizes. Infant Behav Dev 23:317–329. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00047-9 |
| dc.relation.references | Fagard J, Pezé A (1997) Age changes in interlimb coupling and the development of bimanual coordination. J Motor Behav 29:199–208. doi: 10.1080/00222899709600835 |
| dc.relation.references | Gesell A (1946) The ontogenesis of infant behavior. In: Carmichael L (ed) Manual of child psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 295–331. doi: 10.1037/10756-006 |
| dc.relation.references | Glover S (2004) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci 27:3–78 |
| dc.relation.references | Hesse C, Deubel H (2009) Changes in grasping kinematics due to different start postures of the hand. Hum Mov Sci 28:415–436. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.03.001 |
| dc.relation.references | Kuypers HGJM (1962) Corticospinal connections: postnatal development in the rhesus monkey. Science 138:678–680. doi: 10.1126/science.138.3541.678 |
| dc.relation.references | Lee MH, Liu YT, Newell KM (2006) Longitudinal expressions of infant’s prehension as a function of object properties. Infant Behav Dev 29:481–493. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.05.004 |
| dc.relation.references | Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athenes S (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Mov Sci 9:149–176. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(90)90025-9 |
| dc.relation.references | Milner AD, Goodale MA (2008) Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 46:774–785. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.005 |
| dc.relation.references | Newell KM, Scully DM, McDonald PV, Baillargeon R (1989a) Task constraints and infant grip configurations. Dev Psychobiol 22:817–831. doi: 10.1002/dev.420220806 |
| dc.relation.references | Newell KM, Scully DM, Tenenbaum F, Hardiman S (1989b) Body scale and the development of prehension. Dev Psychobiol 22:1–13. doi: 10.1002/dev.420220102 |
| dc.relation.references | Newell KM, McDonald PV, Baillargeon R (1993) Body scale and infant grip configurations. Dev Psychobiol 26:195–205. doi: 10.1002/dev.420260403 |
| dc.relation.references | Newman C, Atkinson J, Braddick O (2001) The development of reaching and looking preferences in infants to objects of different sizes. Dev Psychol 37:561–572. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.561 |
| dc.relation.references | Rosenbaum DA, Vaughan J, Barnes HJ, Jorgensen MJ (1992) Time course of movement planning: selection of hand grips for object manipulation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 18:1058–1073. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1058 |
| dc.relation.references | Schot WD, Brenner E, Smeets JB (2010) Robust movement segmentation by combining multiple sources of information. J Neurosci Methods 187:147–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.004 |
| dc.relation.references | Siddiqui A (1995) Object size as a determinant of grasping in infancy. J Genet Psychol 156:345–358. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1995.9914828 |
| dc.relation.references | Smeets JB, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Mot Control 3:237–271 |
| dc.relation.references | Stelmach GE, Castiello U, Jeannerod M (1994) Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. J Motor Behav 26:178–186. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1994.9941672 |
| dc.relation.references | Timmann D, Stelmach GE, Bloedel JR (1996) Grasping component alterations and limb transport. Exp Brain Res 108:486–492. doi: 10.1007/BF00227271 |
| dc.relation.references | Tresilian JR, Stelmach GE (1997) Common organization for unimanual and bimanual reach-to-grasp tasks. Exp Brain Res 115:283–299. doi: 10.1007/PL00005697 |
| dc.relation.references | van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP (2000) Action and perception in infancy. Infant Behav Dev 23:237–251. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00071-6 |
| dc.relation.references | van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP, Davis WE (1998) Body-scaled ratio as a control parameter for prehension in 5- to 9-year-old children. Dev Psychobiol 33:351–361. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199812)33:4%3C351::AID-DEV6%3E3.0.CO;2-P |
| dc.relation.references | van Doorn H, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJ (2007) Grasping the Muller-Lyer illusion: the contributions of vision for perception in action. Neuropsychologia 45:1939–1947. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.008 |
| dc.relation.references | van Hof P, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP (2002) The relation of unimanual and bimanual reaching to crossing the midline. Child Dev 73:1353–1362. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00476 |
| dc.relation.references | van Hof P, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP (2008) The relation between infants’ perception of catchableness and the control of catching. Dev Psychol 44:182–194. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.182 |
| dc.relation.references | van Soest AJ, Beek PJ (2010) Similar findings, different interpretations: a response to the commentary by Bootsma (2010). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:1064–1066. doi: 10.1037/a0020059 |
| dc.relation.references | van Wermeskerken M, van der Kamp J, te Velde AF, Valero-Garcia AV, Hoozemans MJM, Savelsbergh GJP (2011) Anticipatory reaching of seven- to eleven-month-old infants in occlusion situations. Infant Behav Dev 34:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.09.005 |
| dc.relation.references | von Hofsten C, Fazel-Zandy S (1984) Development of visually guided hand orientation in reaching. J Exp Child Psychol 38:208–219. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90122-X |
| dc.relation.references | von Hofsten C, Roennqvist L (1988) Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:610–621. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.4.610 |
| dc.relation.references | Wallace SA, Weeks DL, Kelso JAS (1990) Temporal constraints in reaching and grasping behavior. Hum Mov Sci 9:69–93. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(90)90036-D |
| dc.relation.references | Warren WH, Whang S (1987) Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body scaled information for affordances. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:371–383. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.13.3.371 |
| dc.relation.references | Atkinson J (2000) The developing visual brain. Oxford University Press, Oxford |
| dc.relation.references | Halverson HM (1931) An experimental study of prehension in infants by means of systematic cinema records. Genetic Psychol Monogr 10:107–286 |
| dc.relation.references | Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance, IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 153–168 |
| dc.relation.references | Kuypers HGJM (1982) A new look at the organization of the motor system. In: Kuypers HGJM, Martin GF (eds) Progress in brain research, vol. 57. Descending pathways to the spinal cord. Elsevier Biomedical, Amsterdam, pp 381–404 |
| dc.relation.references | Newell KM (1986) Constraints on the development of action. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA (eds) Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Martinus-Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 341–360 |
| dc.relation.references | van der Kamp J, Rivas F, van Doorn H, Savelsbergh G (2008) Ventral and dorsal system contributions to visual anticipation in fast ball sports. Int J Sport Psychol 39:100–130 |
| dc.relation.references | van Wermeskerken M, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP (2010) The early development of the use of visual information for action and perception. In: Elliott D, Khan M (eds) Vision and goal-directed movement: neurobehavioral perspectives. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 293–313 |
| dc.relation.references | Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movements. Psychol Rev Monogr 3:1–119 |
| dc.rights | The Author(s) |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License |
| dc.subject | Biomedicine |
| dc.subject | Neurosciences |
| dc.subject | Neurology |
| dc.title | On the relation between action selection and movement control in 5- to 9-month-old infants |
| dc.type | Article |
Author Affiliations
- The University of Hong Kong
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam