File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3171/2011.12.JNS111514
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84859359800
- PMID: 22264186
- WOS: WOS:000301805500031
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Long-term outcome of endovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device in the management of unruptured dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery: Clinical article
Title | Long-term outcome of endovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device in the management of unruptured dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery: Clinical article |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Dissecting aneurysm Flow-diverting device Pipeline embolization device Vascular disorders Vertebral artery |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.thejns-net.org |
Citation | Journal Of Neurosurgery, 2012, v. 116 n. 4, p. 882-887 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Object. Use of a flow-diverting device has shown promising short-term results in the management of vertebral artery (VA) dissecting aneurysms, but there is still uncertainty regarding its long-term efficacy and safety. The authors report their initial experience with respect to the potential utility and long-term clinical outcomes of using a flow-diverting device in the treatment of unruptured dissecting VA aneurysms. Methods. The authors conducted a retrospective review of all cases of unruptured intracranial VA dissecting aneurysms treated at their institution (Tuen Mun Hospital) with a flow-diverting device. They describe the clinical presentations and angiographic features of the cases and report the clinical outcome (with modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores) at most recent follow-up, as well as results of the latest angiographic assessment, with particular focus on in-stent patency and side-branch occlusion. Results. A total of 4 aneurysms were successfully obliterated by using flow-diverting devices alone. Two devices were deployed in a telescoping fashion in each of 2 aneurysms, whereas only 1 device was inserted in each of the other 2 aneurysms. No periprocedural complication was encountered. No patient showed any angiographic evidence of recurrence, in-stent thrombosis, or side-branch occlusion in angiographic reassessment at a mean of 22 months after treatment (range 18-24 months). As of the most recent clinical follow-up (mean 30 months after treatment, range 24-37 months), all patients had favorable outcomes (mRS Score 0). Conclusions. Reconstruction using a flow-diverting device is an attractive alternative in definitive treatment of dissecting VA aneurysms, demonstrating favorable long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes and the ability to maintain parent artery and side-branch patency. It is particularly useful in cases with eloquent side-branch or dominant VA involvement. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/144530 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.173 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, TW | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, V | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, HY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Poon, WL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, CB | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, YC | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-03T06:12:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-03T06:12:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Neurosurgery, 2012, v. 116 n. 4, p. 882-887 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-3085 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/144530 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Object. Use of a flow-diverting device has shown promising short-term results in the management of vertebral artery (VA) dissecting aneurysms, but there is still uncertainty regarding its long-term efficacy and safety. The authors report their initial experience with respect to the potential utility and long-term clinical outcomes of using a flow-diverting device in the treatment of unruptured dissecting VA aneurysms. Methods. The authors conducted a retrospective review of all cases of unruptured intracranial VA dissecting aneurysms treated at their institution (Tuen Mun Hospital) with a flow-diverting device. They describe the clinical presentations and angiographic features of the cases and report the clinical outcome (with modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores) at most recent follow-up, as well as results of the latest angiographic assessment, with particular focus on in-stent patency and side-branch occlusion. Results. A total of 4 aneurysms were successfully obliterated by using flow-diverting devices alone. Two devices were deployed in a telescoping fashion in each of 2 aneurysms, whereas only 1 device was inserted in each of the other 2 aneurysms. No periprocedural complication was encountered. No patient showed any angiographic evidence of recurrence, in-stent thrombosis, or side-branch occlusion in angiographic reassessment at a mean of 22 months after treatment (range 18-24 months). As of the most recent clinical follow-up (mean 30 months after treatment, range 24-37 months), all patients had favorable outcomes (mRS Score 0). Conclusions. Reconstruction using a flow-diverting device is an attractive alternative in definitive treatment of dissecting VA aneurysms, demonstrating favorable long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes and the ability to maintain parent artery and side-branch patency. It is particularly useful in cases with eloquent side-branch or dominant VA involvement. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.thejns-net.org | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Neurosurgery | en_HK |
dc.subject | Dissecting aneurysm | - |
dc.subject | Flow-diverting device | - |
dc.subject | Pipeline embolization device | - |
dc.subject | Vascular disorders | - |
dc.subject | Vertebral artery | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Cerebral Angiography | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Embolization, Therapeutic - instrumentation | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Equipment Design | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Follow-Up Studies | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Retrospective Studies | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Stents | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Vertebral Artery Dissection - radiography - therapy | en_HK |
dc.title | Long-term outcome of endovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device in the management of unruptured dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial vertebral artery: Clinical article | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lai, V:laiv@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lai, V=rp01516 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3171/2011.12.JNS111514 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22264186 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84859359800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 198601 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84859359800&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 116 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 882 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 887 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000301805500031 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yeung, TW=55173046100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lai, V=15829844300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, HY=55169155200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Poon, WL=7103025388 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tan, CB=7402818142 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, YC=7403040273 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0022-3085 | - |