File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02196.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84055183061
- PMID: 21492239
- WOS: WOS:000298548900014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connective tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of “platform switching”: a histologic study in minipigs
Title | Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connective tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of “platform switching”: a histologic study in minipigs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||
Keywords | Biologic Width Connective Tissue Adaptation Epithelial Attachment Healing Oral Implants Platform Switching | ||||
Issue Date | 2012 | ||||
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | ||||
Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 1, p. 90-94 How to Cite? | ||||
Abstract | AIM: To validate the 'platform switching' concept at oral implants with respect to the preservation of the alveolar crestal bone levels in an animal model. MATERIAL and METHODS: Five minipigs received three implants each with a 0.25 mm implant/abutment mismatch and were placed flush (T(0)), 1 mm below (T(1)) and 1 mm above (T(+1)) the alveolar bony crest, and as a control, one conventionally restored implant placed at the bone level. The implants were randomly inserted flapless into the mandible. Four months after implant insertion, the animals were sacrificed, and undecalcified block sections were obtained and used for histological analyses. RESULTS: The mean values for peri-implant bone resorption were 1.09 +/- 0.59 mm (Control), 0.51 (+/- 0.27 mm, T(0)), 0.50 (+/- 0.46 mm, T(+1)) and 1.30 (+/- 0.21 mm, T(-1)), respectively. Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) were found among the test (T(0), T(-1)) and the control sites. Control implants presented an average biologic width length of 3.20 mm (+/- 0.33), with a connective tissue adaptation compartment of 1.29 mm (+/- 0.53) and an epithelial attachment of 1.91 mm (+/- 0.71). T(0), T(+1) and T(-1) implants presented with a mean biologic width of 1.97 mm (+/- 1.20), 2.70 mm (+/- 1.36) and 2.84 mm (+/- 0.90), respectively, with a connective tissue adaptation compartment of 1.21 mm (+/- 0.97), 1.21 mm (+/- 0.65) and 1.50 mm (+/- 0.70) and an epithelial attachment of 0.84 mm (+/- 0.93), 1.66 mm (+/- 0.88) and 1.35 mm (+/- 0.44), respectively. Differences between the configurations were mainly associated with the length of the epithelial attachment. The epithelial attachment was significantly longer in the C sites than in T(0) (P=0.014). However, no other differences between configurations were detected. CONCLUSION: If the implants are positioned at the level of the alveolar bony crest, the platform-switching concept may have a minor impact on the length of the epithelial attachment (0.84 vs. 1.91 mm), while the connective tissue adaptation compartment remains relatively unaffected. Moreover, platform switching resulted in less resorption of the alveolar crest (0.58 mm). | ||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/144496 | ||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865 | ||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: The authors would like to thank Prof. Alessandro Addis and Dr. Marino Campagnol (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Milan, Italy), Dr. Ivan Toschi and Dr. Valentina Cesari (Section of Agriculture Animal Husbandry Department of Animal Science, Milan, Italy), Dr. Dario Andreoni, Dr Roberto Crespi, Dr Elisabetta Mariani and Dr. Marco Benigni for the clinical and histological part of the study. The study has been supported by a grant from Sweden & Martina srl, Due Carrare, PD, Italy. The authors declare no conflict of interest. |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Farronato, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Santoro, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Canullo, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Botticelli, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Maiorana, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-03T06:11:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-03T06:11:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2012, v. 23 n. 1, p. 90-94 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/144496 | - |
dc.description.abstract | AIM: To validate the 'platform switching' concept at oral implants with respect to the preservation of the alveolar crestal bone levels in an animal model. MATERIAL and METHODS: Five minipigs received three implants each with a 0.25 mm implant/abutment mismatch and were placed flush (T(0)), 1 mm below (T(1)) and 1 mm above (T(+1)) the alveolar bony crest, and as a control, one conventionally restored implant placed at the bone level. The implants were randomly inserted flapless into the mandible. Four months after implant insertion, the animals were sacrificed, and undecalcified block sections were obtained and used for histological analyses. RESULTS: The mean values for peri-implant bone resorption were 1.09 +/- 0.59 mm (Control), 0.51 (+/- 0.27 mm, T(0)), 0.50 (+/- 0.46 mm, T(+1)) and 1.30 (+/- 0.21 mm, T(-1)), respectively. Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) were found among the test (T(0), T(-1)) and the control sites. Control implants presented an average biologic width length of 3.20 mm (+/- 0.33), with a connective tissue adaptation compartment of 1.29 mm (+/- 0.53) and an epithelial attachment of 1.91 mm (+/- 0.71). T(0), T(+1) and T(-1) implants presented with a mean biologic width of 1.97 mm (+/- 1.20), 2.70 mm (+/- 1.36) and 2.84 mm (+/- 0.90), respectively, with a connective tissue adaptation compartment of 1.21 mm (+/- 0.97), 1.21 mm (+/- 0.65) and 1.50 mm (+/- 0.70) and an epithelial attachment of 0.84 mm (+/- 0.93), 1.66 mm (+/- 0.88) and 1.35 mm (+/- 0.44), respectively. Differences between the configurations were mainly associated with the length of the epithelial attachment. The epithelial attachment was significantly longer in the C sites than in T(0) (P=0.014). However, no other differences between configurations were detected. CONCLUSION: If the implants are positioned at the level of the alveolar bony crest, the platform-switching concept may have a minor impact on the length of the epithelial attachment (0.84 vs. 1.91 mm), while the connective tissue adaptation compartment remains relatively unaffected. Moreover, platform switching resulted in less resorption of the alveolar crest (0.58 mm). | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_US |
dc.rights | The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com | - |
dc.subject | Biologic Width | - |
dc.subject | Connective Tissue Adaptation | - |
dc.subject | Epithelial Attachment | - |
dc.subject | Healing | - |
dc.subject | Oral Implants | - |
dc.subject | Platform Switching | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Alveolar Bone Loss - pathology | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Connective Tissue - physiology | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Epithelial Attachment - physiology | - |
dc.title | Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connective tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of “platform switching”: a histologic study in minipigs | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Canullo, L: luigicanullo@yahoo.co | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP: nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02196.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21492239 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84055183061 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 198292 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 23 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 90 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 94 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000298548900014 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Farronato, D=22034456100 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Santoro, G=24167488700 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Canullo, L=22233349200 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Botticelli, D=6601962395 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Maiorana, C=6604063533 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0905-7161 | - |