Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Combined resection and radiofrequency ablation for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: prognosis and outcomes

TitleCombined resection and radiofrequency ablation for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: prognosis and outcomes
Authors
KeywordsCirrhosis
Combined resection
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Radiofrequency ablation
Resection
Issue Date2010
PublisherBaishideng Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/index.htm
Citation
World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010, v. 16 n. 24, p. 3056-3062 How to Cite?
AbstractAIM: To analyze the combined treatment of resection and intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma in terms of prognosis and surgical outcomes. METHODS: This study was a retrospective case comparison study using prospectively collected data. The study covered the period from April 2001 to December 2006. The data of 200 patients with histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma were reviewed. Nineteen patients (17 men and 2 women) having received resection in combination with RFA were chosen as subjects of the study (the combination group). Fifty-four patients (43 men and 11 women) having received resection alone were selected for comparison (the resection group). The two groups matched tumor number and tumor size, and all the patients in the two groups displayed no tumor rupture, major vascular involvement and distant metastasis. Their demographics, preoperative assessment, disease recurrence patterns, overall survival and disease-free survival were compared. RESULTS: In the combination group, the median age was 65 years (range, 34-77 years), the median tumor number was 3 (range, 2-9), and the median tumor size was 6 cm (range, 1.2-14 cm). In the resection group, the median age was 51.5 years (range, 27-80 years, P = 0.003), the median tumor number was 3 (range, 2-9, P = 0.574), and the median tumor size was 6 cm (range, 1-14 cm, P = 0.782). The two groups were similar in characteristics of tumors and comorbidities, and had comparable results in preoperative liver function tests. All patients had Child-Pugh class A status. Bilobar involvement occurred in 14 patients (73.6%) in the combination group and 3 patients (5.5%) in the resection group (P = 0.04). Six patients (32%) in the combination group and 35 patients (65%) in the resection group underwent major hepatectomy. Thirteen patients (68%) in the combination group and 19 patients (35%) in the resection group underwent minor hepatectomy (P = 0.012). The combination group had fewer major resections (32% vs 65%, P = 0.012), less blood loss (400 vs 657 mL, P = 0.007), shorter operation time (270 vs 400 min, P = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (7 vs 8.5 d, P = 0.042). The two groups displayed no major differences in surgical complications (15.8% vs 31.5%, P = 0.24), disease recurrence (63.2% vs 50%, P = 0.673), hospital mortality (5.3% vs 5.6%, P = 1), and overall survival (53 vs 44.5 mo, P = 0.496). CONCLUSION: Safe and effective for selected patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma, the combination of resection and intraoperative RFA widens the applicability of surgical intervention for the disease.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/144489
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.787
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.076
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, TT-
dc.contributor.authorNg, KKC-
dc.contributor.authorChok, KSH-
dc.contributor.authorChan, SC-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, RTP-
dc.contributor.authorLo, CM-
dc.contributor.authorFan, ST-
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-03T01:35:42Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-03T01:35:42Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationWorld Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010, v. 16 n. 24, p. 3056-3062-
dc.identifier.issn1007-9327-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/144489-
dc.description.abstractAIM: To analyze the combined treatment of resection and intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma in terms of prognosis and surgical outcomes. METHODS: This study was a retrospective case comparison study using prospectively collected data. The study covered the period from April 2001 to December 2006. The data of 200 patients with histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma were reviewed. Nineteen patients (17 men and 2 women) having received resection in combination with RFA were chosen as subjects of the study (the combination group). Fifty-four patients (43 men and 11 women) having received resection alone were selected for comparison (the resection group). The two groups matched tumor number and tumor size, and all the patients in the two groups displayed no tumor rupture, major vascular involvement and distant metastasis. Their demographics, preoperative assessment, disease recurrence patterns, overall survival and disease-free survival were compared. RESULTS: In the combination group, the median age was 65 years (range, 34-77 years), the median tumor number was 3 (range, 2-9), and the median tumor size was 6 cm (range, 1.2-14 cm). In the resection group, the median age was 51.5 years (range, 27-80 years, P = 0.003), the median tumor number was 3 (range, 2-9, P = 0.574), and the median tumor size was 6 cm (range, 1-14 cm, P = 0.782). The two groups were similar in characteristics of tumors and comorbidities, and had comparable results in preoperative liver function tests. All patients had Child-Pugh class A status. Bilobar involvement occurred in 14 patients (73.6%) in the combination group and 3 patients (5.5%) in the resection group (P = 0.04). Six patients (32%) in the combination group and 35 patients (65%) in the resection group underwent major hepatectomy. Thirteen patients (68%) in the combination group and 19 patients (35%) in the resection group underwent minor hepatectomy (P = 0.012). The combination group had fewer major resections (32% vs 65%, P = 0.012), less blood loss (400 vs 657 mL, P = 0.007), shorter operation time (270 vs 400 min, P = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (7 vs 8.5 d, P = 0.042). The two groups displayed no major differences in surgical complications (15.8% vs 31.5%, P = 0.24), disease recurrence (63.2% vs 50%, P = 0.673), hospital mortality (5.3% vs 5.6%, P = 1), and overall survival (53 vs 44.5 mo, P = 0.496). CONCLUSION: Safe and effective for selected patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma, the combination of resection and intraoperative RFA widens the applicability of surgical intervention for the disease.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBaishideng Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/index.htm-
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Gastroenterology-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectCirrhosis-
dc.subjectCombined resection-
dc.subjectHepatocellular carcinoma-
dc.subjectRadiofrequency ablation-
dc.subjectResection-
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis - pathology - surgery-
dc.subject.meshCatheter Ablation-
dc.subject.meshHepatectomy-
dc.subject.meshLiver Neoplasms - diagnosis - pathology - surgery-
dc.subject.meshCombined Modality Therapy-
dc.titleCombined resection and radiofrequency ablation for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: prognosis and outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailCheung, TT: tantocheung@hotmail.com, cheung68@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailNg, KKC: kkcng95@gmail.com-
dc.identifier.emailChok, KSH: kennethchok@yahoo.com.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, SC: seechingchan@gmail.com-
dc.identifier.emailPoon, RTP: poontp@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLo, CM: chungmlo@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailFan, ST: stfan@hku.hk-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3748/wjg.v16.i24.3056-
dc.identifier.pmid20572310-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC2890947-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77954558611-
dc.identifier.hkuros173504-
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.issue24-
dc.identifier.spage3056-
dc.identifier.epage3062-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000279383200013-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats