Article: Seroprevalence of pandemic h1n1 antibody among health care workers in hong kong following receipt of monovalent 2009 h1n1 influenza vaccine

File Download Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
Supplementary
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleSeroprevalence of pandemic h1n1 antibody among health care workers in hong kong following receipt of monovalent 2009 h1n1 influenza vaccine
AuthorsZhou, Y2
Ng, DMW2
Seto, WH1
Ip, DKM2
Kwok, HKH1
Ma, ESK2
Ng, S2
Lau, LLH2
Peiris, JSM2 3
Cowling, BJ2
KeywordsInfluenza virus A H1N1
Seroprevalence
2009 H1N1 influenza
Antibody titer
Immunogenicity
Issue Date2011
PublisherPublic Library of Science. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.plosone.org/home.action
CitationPlos One, 2011, v. 6 n. 11 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027169
AbstractBackground: Healthcare workers in many countries are recommended to receive influenza vaccine to protect themselves as well as patients. A monovalent H1N1 vaccine became available in Hong Kong in December 2009 and around 10% of local healthcare workers had received the vaccine by February 2010. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of the prevalence of antibody to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 among HCWs in Hong Kong in February-March 2010 following the first pandemic wave and the pH1N1 vaccination campaign. In this study we focus on the subset of healthcare workers who reported receipt of non-adjuvanted monovalent 2009 H1N1 vaccine (Panenza, Sanofi Pasteur). Sera collected from HCWs were tested for antibody against the pH1N1 virus by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and viral neutralization (VN) assays. Results: We enrolled 703 HCWs. Among 104 HCWs who reported receipt of pH1N1 vaccine, 54% (95% confidence interval (CI): 44%-63%) had antibody titer ≥1:40 by HI and 42% (95% CI: 33%-52%) had antibody titer ≥1:40 by VN. The proportion of HCWs with antibody titer ≥1:40 by HI and VN significantly decreased with age, and the proportion with antibody titer ≥1:40 by VN was marginally significantly lower among HCWs who reported prior receipt of 2007-08 seasonal influenza vaccine (odds ratio: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.19-1.00). After adjustment for age, the effect of prior seasonal vaccine receipt was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that monovalent H1N1 vaccine may have had suboptimal immunogenicity in HCWs in Hong Kong. Larger studies are required to confirm whether influenza vaccine maintains high efficacy and effectiveness in HCWs. © 2011 Zhou et al.
ISSN1932-6203
2011 Impact Factor: 4.092
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.519
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027169
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000297348800017
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Hong Kong University Grants CommitteeAoE/M-12/06
MedImmune Inc.
Roche
Funding Information:

This work has received financial support from the Area of Excellence Scheme of the Hong Kong University Grants Committee (grant no. AoE/M-12/06). The funding body was not involved in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of the article, or the decision to submit it for publication.

PubMed Central IDPMC3213124
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
GrantsControl of Pandemic and Inter-pandemic Influenza
DC Field
Value
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Y
dc.contributor.authorNg, DMW
dc.contributor.authorSeto, WH
dc.contributor.authorIp, DKM
dc.contributor.authorKwok, HKH
dc.contributor.authorMa, ESK
dc.contributor.authorNg, S
dc.contributor.authorLau, LLH
dc.contributor.authorPeiris, JSM
dc.contributor.authorCowling, BJ
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-21T08:54:26Z
dc.date.available2011-12-21T08:54:26Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractBackground: Healthcare workers in many countries are recommended to receive influenza vaccine to protect themselves as well as patients. A monovalent H1N1 vaccine became available in Hong Kong in December 2009 and around 10% of local healthcare workers had received the vaccine by February 2010. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of the prevalence of antibody to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 among HCWs in Hong Kong in February-March 2010 following the first pandemic wave and the pH1N1 vaccination campaign. In this study we focus on the subset of healthcare workers who reported receipt of non-adjuvanted monovalent 2009 H1N1 vaccine (Panenza, Sanofi Pasteur). Sera collected from HCWs were tested for antibody against the pH1N1 virus by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and viral neutralization (VN) assays. Results: We enrolled 703 HCWs. Among 104 HCWs who reported receipt of pH1N1 vaccine, 54% (95% confidence interval (CI): 44%-63%) had antibody titer ≥1:40 by HI and 42% (95% CI: 33%-52%) had antibody titer ≥1:40 by VN. The proportion of HCWs with antibody titer ≥1:40 by HI and VN significantly decreased with age, and the proportion with antibody titer ≥1:40 by VN was marginally significantly lower among HCWs who reported prior receipt of 2007-08 seasonal influenza vaccine (odds ratio: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.19-1.00). After adjustment for age, the effect of prior seasonal vaccine receipt was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that monovalent H1N1 vaccine may have had suboptimal immunogenicity in HCWs in Hong Kong. Larger studies are required to confirm whether influenza vaccine maintains high efficacy and effectiveness in HCWs. © 2011 Zhou et al.
dc.description.grantControl of Pandemic and Inter-pandemic Influenza
dc.description.grantcode97655
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version
dc.identifier.citationPlos One, 2011, v. 6 n. 11 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027169
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027169
dc.identifier.epagee27169
dc.identifier.hkuros197999
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000297348800017
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Hong Kong University Grants CommitteeAoE/M-12/06
MedImmune Inc.
Roche
Funding Information:

This work has received financial support from the Area of Excellence Scheme of the Hong Kong University Grants Committee (grant no. AoE/M-12/06). The funding body was not involved in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of the article, or the decision to submit it for publication.

dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
2011 Impact Factor: 4.092
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.519
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC3213124
dc.identifier.pmid22102878
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-80755159561
dc.identifier.spagee27169
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/143772
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.plosone.org/home.action
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License
dc.subjectInfluenza virus A H1N1
dc.subjectSeroprevalence
dc.subject2009 H1N1 influenza
dc.subjectAntibody titer
dc.subjectImmunogenicity
dc.titleSeroprevalence of pandemic h1n1 antibody among health care workers in hong kong following receipt of monovalent 2009 h1n1 influenza vaccine
dc.typeArticle
Author Affiliations
  1. Hong Kong Hospital Authority
  2. The University of Hong Kong
  3. HKU-Pasteur Research Centre