File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of Listerine and Corsodyl on orthodontic brackets in vitro

TitleComparison of the antimicrobial activity of Listerine and Corsodyl on orthodontic brackets in vitro
Authors
Issue Date2011
PublisherMosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajodo
Citation
American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2011, v. 140 n. 4, p. 537-542 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of 2 commercially available mouth rinses on a monospecies-biofilm model on orthodontic brackets in vitro. Methods: The antimicrobial effects of the 2 mouth rinses, Listerine (tartar control; IDS Manufacturing, Bangkok, Thailand) and Corsodyl (SmithKline Beecham, Maidenhead, United Kingdom), on the planktonic Streptococcus mutans were tested by maximum inhibitory dilution assay. The cell viability of S mutans biofilm on Damon3 MX brackets (Ormco, Glendora, Calif) after exposure to the 2 mouth rinses was quantified by 2,3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino) carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) reduction assay. Visualization of the biofilm samples was performed by fluorescence microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Results: The maximum inhibitory dilution assays of S mutans were 1:5 for Listerine and 1:320 for Corsodyl. The optical density values, which were measured by XTT reduction assay from S mutans biofilms after 1 minute of exposure to the different test agents, demonstrated that the cell viability of S mutans biofilms exposed to Listerine was less than that for Corsodyl, which was less than that for brain-heart infusion (P <0.001). Listerine caused more dead cells on the surface of the brackets than did Corsodyl when examined with the 2 microscope systems. Conclusions: Both mouth rinses showed marked antimicrobial effects on the monospecies biofilm in vitro. Listerine showed a stronger bactericidal effect but had less bacterial inhibitory effect than did Corsodyl.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/143358
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.69
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.249
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, RWKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSeneviratne, CJen_HK
dc.contributor.authorHägg, Uen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, Cen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSamaranayake, LPen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-24T10:03:14Z-
dc.date.available2011-11-24T10:03:14Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2011, v. 140 n. 4, p. 537-542en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/143358-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of 2 commercially available mouth rinses on a monospecies-biofilm model on orthodontic brackets in vitro. Methods: The antimicrobial effects of the 2 mouth rinses, Listerine (tartar control; IDS Manufacturing, Bangkok, Thailand) and Corsodyl (SmithKline Beecham, Maidenhead, United Kingdom), on the planktonic Streptococcus mutans were tested by maximum inhibitory dilution assay. The cell viability of S mutans biofilm on Damon3 MX brackets (Ormco, Glendora, Calif) after exposure to the 2 mouth rinses was quantified by 2,3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino) carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) reduction assay. Visualization of the biofilm samples was performed by fluorescence microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Results: The maximum inhibitory dilution assays of S mutans were 1:5 for Listerine and 1:320 for Corsodyl. The optical density values, which were measured by XTT reduction assay from S mutans biofilms after 1 minute of exposure to the different test agents, demonstrated that the cell viability of S mutans biofilms exposed to Listerine was less than that for Corsodyl, which was less than that for brain-heart infusion (P <0.001). Listerine caused more dead cells on the surface of the brackets than did Corsodyl when examined with the 2 microscope systems. Conclusions: Both mouth rinses showed marked antimicrobial effects on the monospecies biofilm in vitro. Listerine showed a stronger bactericidal effect but had less bacterial inhibitory effect than did Corsodyl.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherMosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajodoen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnti-Infective Agents, Local - administration and dosage - pharmacology-
dc.subject.meshBiofilms - drug effects-
dc.subject.meshChlorhexidine - administration and dosage - analogs and derivatives - pharmacology-
dc.subject.meshMouthwashes - administration and dosage - pharmacology-
dc.subject.meshOrthodontic Brackets - microbiology-
dc.titleComparison of the antimicrobial activity of Listerine and Corsodyl on orthodontic brackets in vitroen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0889-5406&volume=140&spage=537&epage=542&date=2011&atitle=Comparison+of+the+antimicrobial+activity+of+Listerine+and+Corsodyl+on+orthodontic+brackets+in+vitroen_US
dc.identifier.emailWong, RWK:fyoung@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailSeneviratne, CJ:jaya@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailHägg, U:euohagg@hkusua.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcGrath, C:mcgrathc@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailSamaranayake, LP:lakshman@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityWong, RWK=rp00038en_HK
dc.identifier.authoritySeneviratne, CJ=rp01372en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityHägg, U=rp00020en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityMcGrath, C=rp00037en_HK
dc.identifier.authoritySamaranayake, LP=rp00023en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.01.022en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid21967942-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-80053550371en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros197693en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-80053550371&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume140en_HK
dc.identifier.issue4en_HK
dc.identifier.spage537en_HK
dc.identifier.epage542en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000295874800027-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChen, Y=37116729600en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, RWK=7402127170en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSeneviratne, CJ=6701897753en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHägg, U=7006790279en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcGrath, C=7102335507en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSamaranayake, LP=7102761002en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats