File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of oral impacts experienced by patients treated with labial or customized lingual fixed orthodontic appliances

TitleComparison of oral impacts experienced by patients treated with labial or customized lingual fixed orthodontic appliances
Authors
Issue Date2011
PublisherMosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajodo
Citation
American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2011, v. 139 n. 6, p. 784-790 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: Our objective was to compare the oral impacts experienced by patients treated with labial or customized lingual fixed orthodontic appliances. Methods: This was an age- and sex-matched prospective longitudinal study of 60 adult patients treated with either labial or customized lingual fixed orthodontic appliances over a 3-month period. Ratings of oral impacts experienced and satisfaction were made on visual analog scales at 3 time points after appliance fixation. Variations in oral impacts and satisfaction over the trajectory of treatment were assessed. Area-under-the-curve analyses were conducted to assess variations in oral impacts and satisfaction between the groups. Results: All patients experienced oral impact disturbances, although these disturbances decreased over time (P <0.001). Patients treated with customized lingual appliances reported more oral discomfort (P <0.001), dietary changes (P <0.001), swallowing difficulty (P <0.001), speech disturbances (P <0.001), and social problems (P <0.001) than did those in the other group. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding ratings of oral self-care, mastication, and satisfaction level of treatment (P >0.05). Conclusions: The findings indicate that oral impacts are commonly experienced during both labial and customized lingual fixed orthodontic therapies. However, the oral impacts decreased over the observational period. Patients treated with customized lingual appliances experienced more oral impacts. Both groups had similar levels of treatment satisfaction. © 2011 by the American Association of Orthodontists.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/143356
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.711
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.183
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
10212.00001757.00000.08003.100.01
Funding Information:

Supported by a grant to A. Bakr M. Rabie (no: 10212.00001757.00000.08003.100.01).

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWu, Aen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, Cen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, RWKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWiechmann, Den_HK
dc.contributor.authorRabie, ABMen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-24T10:03:11Z-
dc.date.available2011-11-24T10:03:11Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2011, v. 139 n. 6, p. 784-790en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/143356-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Our objective was to compare the oral impacts experienced by patients treated with labial or customized lingual fixed orthodontic appliances. Methods: This was an age- and sex-matched prospective longitudinal study of 60 adult patients treated with either labial or customized lingual fixed orthodontic appliances over a 3-month period. Ratings of oral impacts experienced and satisfaction were made on visual analog scales at 3 time points after appliance fixation. Variations in oral impacts and satisfaction over the trajectory of treatment were assessed. Area-under-the-curve analyses were conducted to assess variations in oral impacts and satisfaction between the groups. Results: All patients experienced oral impact disturbances, although these disturbances decreased over time (P <0.001). Patients treated with customized lingual appliances reported more oral discomfort (P <0.001), dietary changes (P <0.001), swallowing difficulty (P <0.001), speech disturbances (P <0.001), and social problems (P <0.001) than did those in the other group. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding ratings of oral self-care, mastication, and satisfaction level of treatment (P >0.05). Conclusions: The findings indicate that oral impacts are commonly experienced during both labial and customized lingual fixed orthodontic therapies. However, the oral impacts decreased over the observational period. Patients treated with customized lingual appliances experienced more oral impacts. Both groups had similar levels of treatment satisfaction. © 2011 by the American Association of Orthodontists.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherMosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajodoen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDeglutition Disorders - etiology-
dc.subject.meshFood Habits-
dc.subject.meshOrthodontic Appliance Design - psychology-
dc.subject.meshOrthodontic Appliances - adverse effects-
dc.subject.meshTooth Movement - instrumentation - psychology-
dc.titleComparison of oral impacts experienced by patients treated with labial or customized lingual fixed orthodontic appliancesen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0889-5406&volume=139&spage=784&epage=790&date=2011&atitle=Comparison+of+oral+impacts+experienced+by+patients+treated+with+labial+or+customized+lingual+fixed+orthodontic+appliancesen_US
dc.identifier.emailMcGrath, C: mcgrathc@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailRabie, ABM: rabie@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityMcGrath, C=rp00037en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityRabie, ABM=rp00029en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.027en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid21640885-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79958051317en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros197690en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79958051317&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume139en_HK
dc.identifier.issue6en_HK
dc.identifier.spage784en_HK
dc.identifier.epage790en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000291242800023-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWu, A=48661608900en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcGrath, C=7102335507en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, RWK=36642905800en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWiechmann, D=7004476038en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridRabie, ABM=7007172734en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0889-5406-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats