File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A comparison of tabular expression-based testing strategies

TitleA comparison of tabular expression-based testing strategies
Authors
KeywordsTabular expression
Conditionally subsume
Subsume
Test case constraint
Unconditionally subsume
Issue Date2011
PublisherIEEE. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.computer.org/tse
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2011, v. 37 n. 5, p. 616-634 How to Cite?
AbstractTabular expressions have been proposed as a notation to document mathematically precise but readable software specifications. One of the many roles of such documentation is to guide testers. This paper 1) explores the application of four testing strategies (the partition strategy, decision table-based testing, the basic meaningful impact strategy, and fault-based testing) to tabular expression-based specifications, and 2) compares the strategies on a mathematical basis through formal and precise definitions of the subsumption relationship. We also compare these strategies through experimental studies. These results will help researchers improve current methods and will enable testers to select appropriate testing strategies for tabular expression-based specifications.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/142946
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.868
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)01/P1.2/C009
03/CE3/1405
Research Grants Council of Hong Kong717308
Funding Information:

This research is sponsored by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under grants 01/P1.2/C009 and 03/CE3/1405, and the General Research Fund of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong under project no. 717308.

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFeng, X-
dc.contributor.authorParnas, DL-
dc.contributor.authorTse, TH-
dc.contributor.authorO'Callaghan, T-
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-28T02:59:40Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-28T02:59:40Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2011, v. 37 n. 5, p. 616-634-
dc.identifier.issn0098-5589-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/142946-
dc.description.abstractTabular expressions have been proposed as a notation to document mathematically precise but readable software specifications. One of the many roles of such documentation is to guide testers. This paper 1) explores the application of four testing strategies (the partition strategy, decision table-based testing, the basic meaningful impact strategy, and fault-based testing) to tabular expression-based specifications, and 2) compares the strategies on a mathematical basis through formal and precise definitions of the subsumption relationship. We also compare these strategies through experimental studies. These results will help researchers improve current methods and will enable testers to select appropriate testing strategies for tabular expression-based specifications.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherIEEE. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.computer.org/tse-
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering-
dc.rightsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Copyright © IEEE.-
dc.rights©2011 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.-
dc.subjectTabular expression-
dc.subjectConditionally subsume-
dc.subjectSubsume-
dc.subjectTest case constraint-
dc.subjectUnconditionally subsume-
dc.titleA comparison of tabular expression-based testing strategies-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailTse, TH: thtse@cs.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityTse, TH=rp00546-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TSE.2011.78-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-80053611830en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros197326-
dc.identifier.hkuros167681-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-80053611830&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume37-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage616-
dc.identifier.epage634-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000295162900002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFeng, X=55224956000en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridParnas, DL=7006616905en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTse, TH=7005496974en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridO'Callaghan, T=25925335300en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0098-5589-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats